Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Personna Cosmetics, Shri Hakim Thanawala Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST., Vapi

Clandestine removal of goods - Shortage of goods found - Charges framed on the basis of statement of appellant no. 2 - Held that:- appellant No.1 had taken stand that Shri Hakim Thanawala is not concerned with the appellant firm. It seen from the show cause notice that Central Excise officers visited the appellant s premises on the basis of intelligence and thereafter how they accepted Shri Hakim Thanawala as Director of the Company when the appellant firm is registered with the Central Excise a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t firm was recorded. The Central Excise officers visited the premises of the appellant firm on 06.3.2007 and show cause notice was issued on 02.6.2009 and no verification was conducted or otherwise. Thus, the demand of duty on the basis of the stock statement and statement of a person, who has no relation with the Appellant firm, can not be sustained. - However, reduced penalty on the 2nd appellant is sustained. - Decided partly in favour of appellants. - Appeal No. E/55,56/2011 - Order No. A/10 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le under Chapter 33 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On 6th/ 7th March 2007, the Central Excise officer of HQrs (Preventive) visited the factory premises of the Appellant No.1 and prepared a stock verification report in the presence of two independent panchas and Appellant No.2, claimed as Director of Appellant No.1. It was recorded shortage of finished goods involving Central Excise duty of ₹ 7,63,190/-. The said Central Excise officers also recorded the statement o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It has also confiscated the goods removed clandestinely and imposed Redemption Fine of ₹ 50,000/- on the Appellant No.1. The Commissioner (Appeals) modified the adjudication order to the extent the redemption fine was set-aside. 4. Learned Advocate for the appellants submits that there was no shortage of finished goods and no stock verification was conducted. He submits that the entire proceeding was initiated on the basis of statement of Appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

He drew attention to the relevant portion of the Panchnama, partnership deed and reply to the show cause notice. 5. On the other hand, the learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). He submits that the stock verification was conducted on 07th March 2007 in the presence of the production Incharge of the appellant firm and Appellant No.2 who claimed as Director of the appellant No.1. No dispute was raised by Appellant No.1 during inves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m the Panchnama dated 07.02.2007 that the Central Excise officers of the HQrs (Preventive) unit, on 06.2.2007, at around 1430Hrs entered into the premises of Appellant No.1 and requested the panchas to witness the proceedings which they agreed to. The Panchas along with Central Excise officers came to the main gate of the appellant firm and asked the security person posted at the main gate of the said unit to call the responsible person from inside. After sometime one person came from the factor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

anawala. 7. A show cause notice dated 02.6.2009 was issued proposing demand of Central Excise duty of ₹ 7,63,190/- alongwith interest leviable on the clandestine removal of finished excisable goods i.e. Toothpaste. It has also proposed imposition of penalty on the appellants. In reply to the show cause notice, by letter dated 23.2.2010 the appellant stated that Shri Hakim Thanawala has not concern with the Appellant No.1 and also not having any position in their factory named M/s. Personna .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as it is governed by the partners. Therefore, the entire demand of duty on the shortage of the finished goods, based on the statement of Shri Hakim Thanawala, cannot be sustained. It is further contended that there was no stock taking conducted in their factory as evident in the alleged stock taking report, insofar as the concerned Central Excise officers had not given the details of the stock verification in the report. It is further contended that the factory was remained closed since 2007, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Panchnama was drawn in his presence and therefore, the Panchnama as well as his statement is a valid document for the instant proceeding. It is also observed that Shri Hakim Thanawala as well as Shri Mihir Aruka, production Incharge of the appellant firm were present at the time of physical verification on 06.3.2007. Neither the appellant unit nor the partner of the appellant firm has filed any objection against the Panchnama before the competent authority within a reasonable time. 9. I find tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies as partnership firm. It is strange that the Central Excise officers visited the premises of the assessee and conducted stock verification and recorded the statement without verifying the identity of a person. There is no material available on record to establish that Shri Hakim Thanawala has any connection with the appellant firm. It is well settled by a series of decisions of the Tribunal that onus lies with the Revenue to establish the clandestine removal of the goods. In the present case, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stained. 10. The Tribunal in the case of Vikram Cement (P) Limited vs. CCE, Kanpur 2012 (286) ELT 615 (Tri. Del.) held that in the absence of any other evidence, the sole statement of the Director cannot establish the case of clandestine removal of the goods and burden to prove is on Revenue and it is required to be discharged effectively. The decision of the Tribunal in the case of Vikram Cement (P) Limited was upheld by the Hon ble Allahabad High Court as reported 2014 (303) ELT A82 (All.). Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case, are as under:- (i) Ureka Polymers Limited vs. CCE, New Delhi 2001 (127) ELT 618 (Tri. Del.) : It was found that production slips maintained for 15 days showing higher production on some dates than those recorded in RG-1 register and vice-versa, evidenced by statement of their suppliers and entries in their registers, note book and ledgers. Statements were recorded over a period of time of various persons including the assessee wher .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version