Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Panchkula Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula And Others

2015 (3) TMI 890 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Stay against attachment of six bank accounts appropriating the amounts therefrom for its payments of the penalty levied rejected - petitioner is a Government of Haryana undertaking - refusal of exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) - The tax dues have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

:- Two drafts amounting to ₹ 4 crores and ₹ 18 crores, we have been informed, have been prepared by the Bank for payment to the Department but the respondents have been restrained from withdrawing the same, by the interim order passed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s stage. The same must await the decision of the appeal before the CIT(Appeals). Considering the fact that the petitioner is a statutory Corporation and receives grants also from the Central Government, it would be proper that no coercive action is t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Respondent : Mr T K Joshi, Adv. ORDER S. J. Vazifdar, Acting Chief Justice (Oral): The petitioner has challenged the respondents' action, attaching six bank accounts, appropriating the amounts therefrom for its payments of the penalty levied, und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

scharging its statutory functions and duties. The respondents contend that the petitioner had not obtained exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) and registration under Section 12AA of the Act and as a result thereof, they are not entitled to the exempt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emand including for the principal amount will be set aside. By an order dated 21.01.2015, a Division Bench of this Court expressed the hope that the petitioner's appeal before the CIT (Appeals) would be decided by the next date of hearing. The sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

51 crores towards interest. The petitioner had, thereafter, filed an application for stay on 10.11.2014 before the CIT (Appeals). The same was rejected on the very same date, without affording the petitioner a hearing. On the same day, the Banks wer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is not a ground for granting the stay. The pendency of the appeal was, however, not the only ground on which the stay was sought. There are several other factors including the constitution of the petitioner and the nature of its functions it is carr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version