Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (3) TMI 1021 - ITAT DELHI

2015 (3) TMI 1021 - ITAT DELHI - TMI - Disallowance u/s 14A - A.R. submitted that the A.O. has made disallowance u/s 14A as per the provisions of Rule 8D without recording satisfaction which is mandatory in law and therefore, the disallowance is not sustainable - Held that:- In the present case the A.O. vide questionnaire dated 22.10.2010 had asked the assessee to explain as to why disallowance in accordance with the provisions of Section 14A should not be made and thereafter holding that reply .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sallowance confirmed by Ld. CIT(A). - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T.A. No. 1568/Del/2013 - Dated:- 25-3-2015 - Shri G. C. Gupta And Shri T.S. Kapoor JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Ashwani Taneja, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri P Dam Kanunjha, Sr. DR ORDER Per T.S. Kapoor, AM: This is an appeal filed by assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A) dated 06.02.2013. The only effective ground of appeal raised by assessee is the disallowance made by A.O. u/s 14A of the Act which was confirmed by Ld .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Rule 8D. Ld. A.R. invited our attention to para 4 of the order of Hon'ble High Court with a view to apprise the Bench that facts in the case of assessee and in the case decided by Hon'ble High Court are identical. Ld. A.R. took us to para 10 onwards where Hon'ble High Court had dealt with the issue and decided the issue in favour of assessee. 3. Ld. D.R. on the other hand heavily relied upon the orders of authorities below. 4. We have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

garding explanation submitted by assessee. We find that Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Taikisha Engineering India Ltd. vide para 10 onwards has decided similar issue in favour of assessee by holding as under: 10. Having heard the Counsel for the parties, we feel that the respondent assessee is entitled to succeed on somewhat different grounds and reasons, than those elucidated by the Tribunal. 11. Section 14A of the Act is relevant and reproduced below:- ―14A. (1) For the purp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. (3) The provisions of sub-section (2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Offi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n (2) to Section 14A of the Act, the Assessing Officer is required to examine the accounts of the assessee and only when he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of expenditure in relation to exempt income, the Assessing Officer can determine the amount of expenditure which should be disallowed in accordance with such method as prescribed, i.e. Rule 8D of the Rules (quoted and elucidated below). Therefore, the Assessing Officer at the first instance must e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e as per Rule 8D of the Rules. Where the disallowance or nil disallowance made by the assessee is found to be unsatisfactory on examination of accounts, the assessing officer is entitled and authorised to compute the deduction under Rule 8D of the Rules. This pre-condition and stipulation as noticed below is also mandated in sub Rule (1) to Rule 8D of the Rules. 12. Rule 8D of the Rules, again for the sake of convenience, is reproduced below:- ―8D. (1) Where the Assessing Officer, having r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich does not form part of the total income shall be the aggregate of following amounts, namely:- (i) the amount of expenditure directly relating to income which does not form part of total income; (ii) in a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure by way of interest during the previous year which is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt, an amount computed in accordance with the following formula, namely :- A × B/C Where A = amount of expenditure by way of i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt of the average of the value of investment, income from which does not or shall not form part of the total income, as appearing in the balance sheet of the assessee, on the first day and the shall mean, total assets as appearing in the balance sheet excluding the increase on account of revaluation of assets but including the decrease on account of revaluation of assets.‖ Sub Rule (1) categorically and significantly states that the Assessing Officer having regard to the account of the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y record that the computation or disallowance made by the assessee or claim that no expenditure was incurred to earn exempt income must be examined with reference to the accounts, and only and when the explanation/claim of the assessee is not satisfactory, computation under sub Rule (2) to Rule 8D of the Rules is to be made. 13. We need not, therefore, go on to sub Rule (2) to Rule 8D of the Rules until and unless the Assessing Officer has first recorded the satisfaction, which is mandated by su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n to income which does not form part of the total income. However, if we examine the provision carefully, we would find that the Assessing Officer is required to determine the amount of such expenditure only if the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts of the assessee, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the said Act. In other words, the requirement of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure. Sub-section (3) is nothing but an offshoot of sub-section (2) of Section 14A. Sub-section (3) applies to cases where the assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the said Act. In other words, sub-section (2) deals with cases where the assessee specifies a positive amount of expenditure in relation to income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(2) of Section 14A of the said Act. It is only if the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee, in both cases, that the Assessing Officer gets jurisdiction to determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income under the said Act in accordance with the prescribed method. The prescribed method being the method stipulated in Rule 8D of the said Rules. While rejecting the claim of the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on No.45 of 2008, dated March 24, 2008, the Central Board of Direct Taxes introduced Rule 8D in the said Rules. The said Rule 8D also makes it clear that where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts of the assessee of a previous year, is not satisfied with (a) the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the asses see; or (b) the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

must record his dissatisfaction with the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the assessee or with the correctness of the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred. It is only when this condition precedent is satisfied that the Assessing Officer is required to determine the amount of expenditure in relation to income not includable in total income in the manner indicated in sub-rule (2) of Rule 8D of the said Rules. It is, therefore, clear that determination of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e formula given therein in a case where the assessee incurs expenditure by way of interest which is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt. The formula essentially apportions the amount of expenditure by way of interest (other than the amount of interest included in clause (i)) incurred during the previous year in the ratio of the average value of investment, income from which does not or shall not form part of the total income, to the average of the total assets of the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. It is, therefore, clear that in terms of the said Rule, the amount of expenditure in relation to exempt income has two aspects - (a) direct and (b) indirect. The direct expenditure is straightaway taken into account by virtue of clause (i) of sub-rule (2) of Rule 8D. The indirect expenditure, where it is by way of interest, is computed through the principle of apportionment, as indicated above. And, in cases where the indirect expenditure is not by way of interest, a rule of thumb figure of on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es not form part of the total income under the Act in accordance with such method as may be prescribed. The method, having regard to the meaning of the expression "prescribed" in section 2(33), must be prescribed by rules made under the Act. What merits emphasis is that the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to determine the expenditure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income, in accordance with the prescribed method, arises if the Assessing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ade by the assessee in respect of the expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income is correct. The Assessing Officer must, in the first instance, determine whether the claim of the assessee in that regard is correct and the determination must be made having regard to the accounts of the assessee. The satisfaction of the Assessing Officer must be arrived at on an objective basis. It is only when the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the claim of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent of the Assessing Officer not being so satisfied that recourse to the prescribed method is mandated by law. Sub-section (3) of section 14A provides for the application of sub-section (2) also to a situation where the assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Act. Under the proviso, it has been stipulated that nothing in the section will empower the Assessing Officer, for an assessment year beginnin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in relation to the dividend business (i.e., earning exempt income). It is for exactly such situations that a machinery/method for computing the proportion of expenditure incurred in relation to the dividend business has been provided by way of section 14A(2)/(3) and rule 8D.‖ 17. More important and relevant for us are the observations in Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. (supra) on requirement and stipulation of satisfaction being recorded by the Assessing Officer with reference to the acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

When a statute postulates the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer "Courts will not readily defer to the conclusiveness of an executive authority's opinion as to the existence of a matter of law or fact upon which the validity of the exercise of the power is predicated". (M. A. Rasheed v. State of Kerala [1974] AIR 1974 SC 2249*). A decision by the Assessing Officer has to be arrived at in good faith on relevant considerations. The Assessing Officer must furnish to the assessee a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ule (1) of rule 8D has also incorporated the essential requirements of sub-section (2) of section 14A before the Assessing Officer proceeds to apply the method prescribed under sub-rule (2).‖ 18. It is in this context we feel that the findings recorded by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal are appropriate and relevant. The clear findings are that the assessee had sufficient funds for making investments in shares and mutual funds. The said findings coupled with the failure of the Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atisfaction is with reference to the accounts. 19. However, the decisions relied upon by the Tribunal in the case of Tin Box Co. (supra), Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. (supra), Suzlon Energy Ltd. (supra) and East India Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. (supra) could not be now applicable, if we apply and compute the disallowance under Rule 8D of the Rules. The said Rule in sub Rule (2) specifically prescribes the mode and method for computing the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. Thus, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nditure by way of interest in the previous year and secondly whether the interest paid was directly attributable to particular income or receipt. In case the interest paid was directly attributable to any particular income or receipt, then the interest on loan amount to this extent or in entirety as the case may be, has to be excluded for making computation as per the formula prescribed. Pertinently, the amount to be disallowed as expenditure relatable to exempt income, under sub Rule (2) is the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version