Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax And Others Versus M/s. Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd.

Penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) - Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) has been disallowed - Held that:- Additions in respect of which penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was levied, have been admitted by the High Court for consideration and thus found that the additions made were debatable and would lead credence to the bonafides of the assessee. It thus held that the matter of imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee has been rejected by the revenue authorities would not make the assessee liable for penalty. The Apex Court in Reliance Petroproducts ( 2010 (3) TMI 80 - SUPREME COURT ) also held that "merely because the assessee had claimed the expenditure, which claim was not acceptable to the revenue, that by itself would not, in our opinion, attract the penalty under Section 271(1)(c). If we accept the contention of the Revenue then in case of every return where the claim made is not accepted by AO for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment proceedings has been admitted by the High Court on the substantial question of law, still penalty can be imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act ? 2. This appeal has been filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Tribunal, which has dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for brevity) has been disallowed. 3. Br .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/-). The disallowance was confirmed on merits by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal was also dismissed. The assessee then filed an appeal before the High Court, which has been admitted on 04.06.2012 (being ITA No.282/2011) on the following substantial questions of law: (A) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon ble Tribunal was right in law in upholding the action of the Learned Respondent under section 147 when the manda .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cumstances of the case, the Hon ble Tribunal was right in law in upholding the disallowance of ₹ 60,000 in respect of remuneration paid to directors of the appellant Company by invoking section 40A(2) of the IT Act? (D) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon ble Tribunal was right in law in upholding the disallowance of ₹ 66,000 in respect of salary paid to Ms.Namratha G Patel? (E) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon ble Trib .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g Authority initiated penalty proceedings on 27.11.2006 against the respondent-assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Vide order dated 25.10.2011 penalty of ₹ 13,42,000/- was levied for concealment of income. The appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of penalty was allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Challenging the said order, the Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT which has also been dismissed by order dated 14.02.2014. Aggrieved by the said order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

law in relying on the Mumbai Tribunal order in the case of Nayan Builders & Developers P.Ltd. in ITA No.2379/Mumbai/2009 dated 18.03.2011without appreciating that the facts of the relied upon case are different and distinct from that of the present case? 5. We have heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants at length and appreciate the fairness with which he has presented the case and placed before us various decisions on the questions at hand. 6. While dismissing th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ayan Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., which had also held that "the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court lends credence to the bona fides of the assessee in claiming deduction. Once it turns out that the claim of the assessee could have been considered for deduction as per a person properly instructed in law and is not completely debarred at all, the mere fact of confirmation of disallowance would not per se lead to the imposition of penalty." 8. The assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l questions of law which have been reproduced hereinabove. 9. The mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the additions made were debatable. The Tribunal has thus rightly held that the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court leads credence to the bona fide of the assessee and therefore, the penalty is not exigible under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Merely because the claim of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere provided by the assessee in its return, and as such, on such ground the penalty proceedings have rightly been initiated. 12. The information supplied by the assessee in its return cannot be said to be concealment of any information. The facts that are borne out in this case are that the assessee had provided certain particulars with regard to payment of salary and loans which had been taken by the Company from certain individuals. The questions as to whether the benefit of the payment of sal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. The extract of the relevant provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is reproduced below: "271(1) If the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner in the course of any proceedings under this Act, is satisfied that any person- (a) xxxxxx (b) xxxxxx (c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, or (d) xxxxxx he may direct tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version