Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Aica Laminates India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax

2015 (3) TMI 1042 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Waiver of pre deposit - case of the appellant was that the appellant has not received fair consideration before the Tribunal, inasmuch as, its Application for exemption from pre-deposit has not been considered on merits - Held that:- In the impugned order, there is no reference to the case of the appellant as such or its contentions. We further notice that there is no reference to the order of the Tribunal, which was passed in the year 1999, which, according to the appellant, should have receive .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Appellant is aggrieved by Annexure-3 order. By Annexure-3 order, the Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has disposed of the Application maintained under Section 35 F of the Act by directing the appellant to deposit fifty per cent of the ₹ 3.07 crores, i.e. ₹ 1.58 crore within a period of eight weeks; learned counsel for the appellant, in fact, wou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d captively in the manufacture of their final products i.e. laminates, etc. Inasmuch as the appellant is enjoying the area based exemption notification, they were not paying any duty on their final products. 2. In such a scenario, Revenue raised demands in respect of the above resins, by invoking the longer period of limitation, which stands confirmed vide the impugned orders of the Commissioner. 3. After hearing both the sides, we find that an identical issue was the subject matter of the earli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it 50% of the amount of ₹ 3.07 crores i.e. ₹ 1.58 crore within a period of 8 weeks from today and report compliance on 4.2.2015. Subject to deposit of the above amount, the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty and entire amount of penalty shall stand waived and its recovery stayed during the pendency of appeal. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel for the Central Excise / respondent. 4. Appellant is engaged in manufacture of lam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers. In short, the complaint is that the actual contentions raised by the appellant were not as such considered. This is in response to the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent, who contended that there is no substantial question of law made out and what is really involved is only the exercise of discretion by the Tribunal, and it has acted within its jurisdiction and no interference is called for. 6. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the issue at hand is square .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d etc. coming into existence at the intermediate stage are chargeable to excise duty. 2. Shri Ramachandran, Corporate Taxation Advisor, submitted that the department is seeking to levy the duty at the initial stage when two products namely, Phenol and Formaldehyde or Urea and Formaldehyde are mixed. The mixture is in unstable condition. He further submitted that the issue has been settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Moti Laminates, reported in 1995 (76) ELT 241 (SC) in which it was held .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

edabad 1996 (65) ECR 79 (Tribunal), iii) CCE, Ahmedabad Vs. Metrowood & Engg. Works Pvt. Ltd.: 1998 (98) ELT 383 (Tribunal) 3. We heard Shri H.K. Jain, learned SDR. 4. As the issue involved in the appeal has been settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Moti Laminates, following the ratio of that decision, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal. 7. According to him, the Commissioner has not properly considered the case of the appellant, namely, that resin, which is captively .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is a matter, which the Tribunal will investigate in the Appeal, but pending such investigation, the Tribunal has only directed, in exercise of its discretion, deposit of 50 per cent of the amount and, that too, only after reckoning the amount, which is within time and also excluding the penalty portion. Hence, no interference is called for. 9. Learned counsel for the appellant also drew our attention to the decision of the Hon ble Apex Court reported in (2006) 13 SCC 347 (Benara Valves Ltd. an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n a routine manner unmindful of the consequences flowing from the order requiring the assessee to deposit full or part of the demand. There can be no rule of universal application in such matters and the order has to be passed keeping in view the factual scenario involved. Merely because this Court has indicated the principles that does not give a license to the forum/authority to pass an order which cannot be sustained on the touchstone of fairness, legality and public interest. Where denial of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Karnataka and Ors. (AIR 1994 SC 923) that under Indian conditions expression "Undue hardship" is normally related to economic hardship. "Undue" which means something which is not merited by the conduct of the claimant, or is very much disproportionate to it. Undue hardship is caused when the hardship is not warranted by the circumstances. 13. For a hardship to be 'undue' it must be shown that the particular burden to observe or perform the requirement is out of pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version