Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Central Excise Chennai II Commissionerate Versus M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd., The Customs, Excise and Service Tax

2015 (3) TMI 1043 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

whether the assessee can utilise the cenvat credit facilities in respect of outdoor catering services, provided in the factory for its employees, as input service - Held that:- Following decision of CCE V. Ultratech Cement Ltd. reported in [2010 (10) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - It is relevant to note that various High Courts have concurred with the above-said principle of the Bombay High Court and followed the above-said decision - Decided against Revenue. - C.M.A. No.1312 of 2010 - Dated:- 19 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was admitted by this Court on the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the first respondent can avail CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on Outdoor catering Service treating them as Input Service ? 2. Whether the second respondent was correct in law in applying the ratio of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal's decision in the case of CCE , Mumbai v. GTC Industries Ltd., (2008 (12) STR, 468 (TR-LB) whyich was appealed before the Hon'ble High Court, Mumbai, in Appeal No.CEXA/21/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ure or clearance of final product nor it could be said to be an activity relating to business and proceed to disallow the cenvat credit. The Adjudicating Authority vide order-in-original, supported the view of the Department and disallowed the cenvat credit. Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, the assessee pursued the matter before the Commissioner (Appeals), who allowed the appeal by following the Larger Bench of the CESTAT in the case of CCE.Mumbai V. M/s.GTC Industries Ltd. As against the sai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt appeal before this Court. 5. Heard learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and the learned counsel appearing for the assessee and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. The core issue involved in this appeal is whether the assessee can utilise the cenvat credit facilities in respect of outdoor catering services, provided in the factory for its employees, as input service. 7. In an identical circumstance, this Court dealt with the issue in a batch of appeals in C.M.A.Nos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

decision of the Larger Bench of the CESTAT in the case of CCE V. GTC Industries Ltd. 2008 (12) STR 468 is a correct law, however, with a rider that where the cost of the food is borne by the worker, the manufacturer cannot take credit of that part of the service tax which is borne by the consumer. 8. For better clarity, the relevant portion of the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of CCE V. Ultratech Cement Ltd. reported in 2010 -TIOL - 745 - HC- MUM - ST reads as follows: "28. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sales promotion, market research etc.) and includes services rendered in relation to business such as auditing, financing ... etc. Thus, the substantive part of the definition "input service" covers services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, whereas the inclusive part of the definition of "input service" covers various services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final products. In other words, the definition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s, but extends to all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product. 29. The expression "activities in relation to business" in the definition of "input service" postulates activities which are integrally connected with the business of the assessee. If the activity is not integrally connected with the business of the manufacture of final product, the service would not qualify to be a input service under rule 2(l) of the 2004 Rules. 30. The Apex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uch contingency the Legislature has incorporated the inclusive part after the substantive part qualified by the place of use. For example, one of the categories mentioned in the inclusive part is "used as packing material". Packing material by itself would not suffice till it is proved that the item is used in the course of manufacture of final product. Mere fact that the item is a packing material whose value is included in the assessable value of final product will not entitle the ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndirect as also absence of the input in the final product on account of the use of the expression "used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product". Similarly, we are of the view that consideration such as input being used as packing material, input used as fuel, input used for generation of electricity or steam, input used as an accessory and input used as paint are per se also not relevant. All these considerations become relevant only when they are read with the expressio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction, the said item would not become an eligible input. The said expression "used in or in relation to the manufacture" have many shades and would cover various situations based on the purpose for which the input is used. However, the specified input would become eligible for credit only when used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product. Hydrogen gas used in the manufacture of sodium cyanide is an eligible input, since it has a significant role to play in the manufacturi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

"used in or in relation to the manufacture" stands complied with. In our view, one has to therefore, read the definition in its entirety." 31. In our opinion, the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (supra) in the context of the definition of 'input' in rule 2(k) of 2004 Rules would equally apply while interpreting the expression "activities relating to business" in rule 2(l) of 2004 Rules. No doubt that the inclusive part of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the scope of 'input service'. Accordingly, in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (supra), we hold that the services having nexus or integral connection with the manufacture of final products as well as the business of manufacture of final product would qualify to be input service under rule 2(l) of 2004 Rules. 32. As rightly contended by Shri Shridharan, learned Counsel for the respondent - assessee, in the present case, the assessee carrying .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

usiness of manufacturing the final product namely, cement. Hence, in our opinion, the Tribunal was justified in following the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of GTC Industries Ltd. (supra) and holding that the assessee is entitled to the credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering service. 33. It is argued on behalf of the revenue that not only the ratio but the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (supra) must be applied ipso facto to hold that the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ncludes services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final products. Therefore, while interpreting the words used in the definition of 'input service', the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the context of the definition of 'input' alone would apply and not the judgment in its entirety. In other words, by applying the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (supra), it cannot be said that the definition of 'input service' is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the business of manufacturing the final product. In the facts of the present case, use of the outdoor catering services is integrally connected with the business of manufacturing cement and therefore, credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering services would be allowable. 35. The argument of the revenue, that the expression "such as" in the definition of input service is exhaustive and is restricted to the services named therein, is also devoid of any merit, because, the substanti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gories of services enumerated after the expression 'such as' in the definition of 'input service' do not relate to any particular class or category of services, but refer to variety of services used in the business of manufacturing the final products. There is nothing in the definition of 'input service' to suggest that the Legislature intended to define that expression restrictively. Therefore, in the absence of any intention of the Legislature to restrict the definition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

egrally connected with the business of the manufacture of cement, credit of service tax paid out on catering services has been rightly allowed by the Tribunal. 36........... 37........... 38. We concur with the above decision of this Court in the case of Coca Cola India (P.) Ltd. (supra). However, in that case, this Court has also held that the cost of any input service that forms part of value of final products would be eligible for CENVAT credit. That observation of the Division Bench is made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version