Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Pushpanjali Floriculture Pvt Ltd Versus Commissionner of Customs (Export) , Nhava Sheva

2015 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Revalidation of Duty Free Import Authorization Licenses (DFIA) - DFIAs could not be debited (utilized as the department had not permitted duty free import of Sodium Saccharin, Ascorbic Acid by importers against DFIA Licences in terms of benefit under Customs Notification No. 40/2006 - could not be utilized due to the ongoing litigation - Held that:- Lower authorities have misread the provisions of law. As per the Handbook of Procedures, only the licensing authorities can permit the revalidation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mes to a conclusion that there are no express provisions for issue of certificates for revalidation. - Commissioner (Appeals) accepts the fact that the licenses are to be revalidated by the licensing authority but does not acknowledge that the licensing authority has no information about the prolonged litigation through the importer went while importing the said goods under DFIAs. This information only, can help DGFT to allow revalidation.

It is for DGFT to revalidate the Licenses. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uthorities to finalize the issue" within the time frame of the licenses. In fact, the licenses remained in constructive custody of customs because customs refused to debit the licenses for duty free import of such goods by all importers. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. C/89325/2014 - Final Order No. A/525/2015-WZB/CB - Dated:- 16-3-2015 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) And P. S. Pruthi, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent : Mr Rameera Hakeem, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Inhibitors/Water Treatment Chemicals. The appellants submitted representations to Customs stating that the DFIAs could not be debited (utilized as the department had not permitted duty free import of Sodium Saccharin, Ascorbic Acid by importers against DFIA Licences in terms of benefit under Customs Notification No. 40/2006. This dispute regarding Saccharin was decided by Hon'ble CESTAT Mumbai vide Order No. A/318/13/CSTB/C-I dt. 23.1.2013 in the case of M/s. Nandlal Bankatlal wherein the Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rejected the stay application filed by Revenue in the same case against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) who had decided the matter in favour of the party. Thus the matter of import of Saccharin and Ascorbic Acid against DFIA Licenses was in litigation. The appellants represented to the Customs department that they had purchased various DFIAs from the market of the above mentioned disputed items, which could not be utilized due to the ongoing litigation. During the period of litigation, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the export and to earn the foreign exchange. In fact it is against the spirit of Import Export Policy and export incentives declared by the Government. However, I find that there are no express provisions, for issue of certificates for the licenses expired in the hands of the Importer/Exporter due to litigation raised by the customs authority. In view of the above findings, the appeal is disposed off". Against this order of Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant is in appeal before us. 3. He .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icate for revalidation of the DFIAs in terms of Para 2.13.1 of the Handbook of Procedures. According to Ld. Counsel, the appellant only wanted a confirmation from the department confirming the litigation during which the licenses could not be utilized. The licensing authorities could not have revalidated the licenses without factual confirmation from Customs explaining the reasons for non-utilization. 4.1 It was confirmed by the Ld. Counsel that they had also imported Saccharin under transferabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e physical custody of the department and therefore revalidation of DFIAs cannot be permitted. In his written submissions he has raised doubts regarding evidence of transfer of licences to the appellant and amount of value transferred as well as the validity of licenses on the date of transfer to the appellants. According to him, only DGFT has proper jurisdiction to revalidate licenses. It was also submitted that the earliest request by the appellant for issue of a certificate is dated 19.5.2010 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this. But it should be fairly understood that adequate justification for revalidation has to be made available to DGFT. And this information can only be made available by Customs. The appellant has merely sought a statement for issue by Customs to the DGFT certifying that the admissibility of import of Saccharin/Ascorbic Acid against the DFIAs licenses remained in litigation. In fact the Commissioner (Appeals) acknowledges this position but comes to a conclusion that there are no express provis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g period of time. Further under such licenses (DFIA) number of items can be imported as per SION norms. They could have utilized license for other items but due to litigation disputed item may have remained unutilized. These licenses may have been purchased by them after starting of litigation but before finalization of issue. In the present case, the appellant have asked for the certificate from the Assistant Commissioner of licenses with them. The present matter is incidental to the basic disp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ormation about the prolonged litigation through the importer went while importing the said goods under DFIAs. This information only, can help DGFT to allow revalidation. 7. The Ld. AR in his written submissions has raised the issues of evidence regarding transfer of licenses and amounts unutilized, validity of licenses on date of transfer etc. We find that these issues were never before the lower authorities nor have we seen any evidence to support these doubts. Therefore, we reject these conten .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in) and in 2011 (ascorbic acid). From the records, we see that the appellant M/s. Pushpanjali Floriculture Ltd., in its letter dt. 19.5.2010, very clearly informed the Dy. Commissioner Customs, Nhava Sheva that they are holding DFIAs that could not be utilized for the relevant import of Sodium Saccharin due to prolonged litigation. Thereafter, they made repeated requests for duty free import against the DFIAs. In the said letter dt. 19th May 2010, they requested the Deputy Commissioner to (1) To .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lants have also imported Saccharin and on provisional basis during the period in dispute. Therefore, it cannot be said that the appellants were only making their request on the basis of litigation undergone by other importers. In any case, the fact that the import of said goods under DFIAs was in dispute is sufficient ground for holding that the licenses could not be utilized due to litigation with customs. It is to be noted that the licenses are for specific inputs. 9. The whole scheme of DFIAs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version