Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Vimal R. Ambani Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, The Commissioner of Income Tax

2015 (4) TMI 407 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Annual Letting Value of the selfoccupied property at Ahmedabad - Standard Rent under the Bombay Rent Control Act v/s Municipal Rateable value in computing the property income u/s. 23 of the I. T. Act, 1961 - Tribunal confirming that the orders of the C.I.T. u/s. 263 holding that the original assessment computing property income on the basis of the Municipal Rateable value was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue - Held that:- While determining the annual letting value in respect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 23(1) of the Act, the departmental authorities shall follow these guidelines reproduced above provided in the Full Bench decision of the Delhi High Court and followed by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Tip Top Typography (2014 (8) TMI 356 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT).

Reference will also have to be made to a decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Kokilaben D. Ambani vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax [2014 (9) TMI 763 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] wherein, we have dealt with th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dents : Mr Vimal Gupta, Sr. Adv. & Mr Sham V Walve JUDGMENT (Per A. K. Menon, J.) By this common order, we dispose of the above Income Tax Reference and the Income Tax Appeal. 2. The Assessee, along with two others had purchased premises for a consideration of ₹ 17,75,000/-. The Assessee claims to have 1/3rd share in the property. On 29th September, 1986, the Assessee filed return of income at ₹ 979/- in respect of assessment year 1986-87. The Appellant/Assessee also submitted a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould be determined on the basis of the standard rent and not on the basis of the rateable value as determined by the Municipal Corporation. He further took the view that in determining the standard rent, the return on the investment should be calculated at 12% and computed the income from house property at ₹ 57,760/- instead of ₹ 979/- as per the return filed by the Appellant/Assessee. 3. Being aggrieved by the order, the Appellant preferred an Appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals), w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ax Act, 1961, the Annual Letting Value of 1/3rd share in the selfoccupied property at Vimal House, Ahmedabad has to be the sum equivalent to the standard rent under the Rent Control Act and not the municipal rateable value." 4. In the meantime, the Tribunal, on the application of the Assessee/Appellant referred the following questions of law, arising out the order of the Tribunal dated 23rd December, 1991 in respect of assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84, for opinion and answer of this Cou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the I. T. Act holding that the original assessment computing property income on the basis of the Municipal Rateable value was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue?" 5. The Tribunal had proceeded on the basis of decisions in respect of the same Assessee in the previous years. 6. Before us, Mr. Mistrilearned Senior Counsel appearing for the Assessee/Appellant has taken us through the decision of this Court in the matter of M. V. Sonavala vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Assessee as compensation in respect of different properties and not at their municipal rateable value. The Tribunal relied upon a Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Motichand Hirachand vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation reported in 1968 SC 441. On behalf of the Assessee, it was contended that a more recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dewan Daulat Ravi Kapoor vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee reported in (1980) 122 ITR 700 had clearly laid down .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dard rent and not the actual rent received. While deciding the said Appeal in M. V. Sonavala's case (supra), the Division Bench of this Court followed a decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Prabhabati Bansali reported in (1983) 141 ITR 419 and held that for the purpose of computing the annual letting value, sum for which the property might reasonably be let from year to year or the annual municipal value is to be taken. The Division Bench of this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pied property, municipal rateable value has to be adopted instead of standard rent?" This Court held, in respect of the said question, that while applying the provisions of rule 1BB for valuing the selfoccupied property, municipal rateable value with addition of statutory deductions, if any, may be adopted instead of standard rent, for arriving at the gross maintainable rent. 9. Mr. Mistri was at pains to submit that although while computing the value for the purpose of section 22 and while .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

decision, this Court has followed the decision of the Full Bench of Delhi High Court and the conclusions in the said Full Bench decision are relevant to the facts of the case at hand, which read as under: "(i) ALV would be the sum at which the property may be reasonably let out by a willing lessor to a willing lessee uninfluenced by any extraneous circumstances. (ii) An inflated or deflated rent based on extraneous consideration may take it out of the bounds of reasonableness. (iii) Actual .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the fair rent is less than the standard rent, then it is the fair rent which shall be taken as ALV and not the standard rent. We would like to remark that still the question remains as to how to determine the reasonable / fair rent. It has been indicated by the Supreme Court that extraneous circumstances may inflate / deflate the "fair rent". The question would, therefore, be as to what would be circumstances which can be taken into consideration by the Assessing Officer while determin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version