New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 462 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (4) TMI 462 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 31 (Tri. - LB) - Denial of refund claim - Scientific and Technical Consultancy Service - Bar of limitation - Whether the "relevant date" for deciding the limiting period of one year under Clause 6 of Appendix to Notification 5/2006-CE(NT) dt. 14.3.2006 for sanction of refund of Cenvat Credit under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules read with Notification No. 5/2006-CE(NT) dt. 14.3.2006 - Held that:- Relevant date for determining the period of limita .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Process Outsourcing (I) Pvt. Ltd. (2014 (9) TMI 747 - CESTAT BANGALORE) were rendered by a Single Member Bench while the judgement in the case of Bechtel India Ltd. (2013 (7) TMI 490 - CESTAT NEW DELHI) has been rendered by a Division Bench. - decision of this Tribunal in the case of Affinity Express India Ltd. (2014 (6) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI) and Business Process Outsourcing (I) Pvt. Ltd. (2014 (9) TMI 747 - CESTAT BANGALORE) were rendered by a Single Member Bench while the judgement in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eturned. - Appeal No. ST/598/12-Mum - Misc. Order No. M/1621/2015-WZB/SMB - Dated:- 17-3-2015 - M. V. Ravindran, Member (J), P. R. Chandrasekharan, Member (T) And P. S. Pruthi, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri D. Nagvenkar, Addl. Commr. (A.R.) For the Respondent : Shri Durgesh Nadkarni, Adv. with Shri C.S. Biradar, Adv. and Shri Vinay Ansurkar, Adv. ORDER Per: M V Ravindra: This matter was referred to the Larger Bench by Single Member Bench by an order dated 14.11.2014 to have uniformity on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The date of receipt of foreign exchange whether it is part or full or advanced Or (d) The date when both activities have been completed i.e. service has been exported and foreign exchange has been received (as foreign exchange may be received in advance) 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. On perusal of the records, it transpires that the question which is referred to the Larger Bench by Single Member Bench noting there was different views on the issue i.e Affinity Express India Pvt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version