Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Conexant Systems P. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 1(2) Hyderabad.

2015 (4) TMI 500 - ITAT HYDERABAD

Transfer pricing adjustment - Deduction u/s 10A - Held that:- DRP in the case of the assessee has not decided this preliminary issue vide its order dated 21.11.2013 in spite of the fact that the same was specifically and separately raised by the assessee in the objections filed before the DRP. We, therefore, consider it fair and proper and in the interest of justice to set aside the impugned order passed by the A.O. under section 143(3) as per the directions issued by the DRP under section 144C( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the preliminary issue before the DRP. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA.No.161/Hyd/2014 - Dated:- 11-3-2015 - SHRI P.M. JAGTAP AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JJ. For The Assessee : Mr. Kanchun Kaushal & Mr. Abhiroop Bhargav For The Revenue : Smt. G. Aparna Rao ORDER PER P.M. JAGTAP, A.M. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the Order of learned ACIT, Circle 1(2), Hyderabad (Assessing Officer) dated 05.12.2013 passed under section 143(3) read with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tems (PB) P. Ltd., Pune. It was wholly owned subsidiary of Paxonet Systems Inc. USA and there were two other subsidiaries viz., Conexant Systems Noida P. Ltd., Noida and Conexant Systems India P. Ltd., Hyderabad. Pursuant to the scheme of amalgamation all these three companies got merged into one company having its registered office at Hyderabad. Prior to amalgamation, Conexant India (PB) Ltd., filed its return of income for the year under consideration in Pune on 29.11.2006 declaring total inco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A.O. in the draft assessment order dated 28.10.2010. The assessee approached the DRP raising various objections in respect of the draft assessment order proposed by the A.O. One of such objections raised by the assessee was that in the absence of notice under section 143(2) served by the A.O. on it within the statutory time limit, the entire assessment proceedings were void abinitio. The DRP found this objection of the assessee to be sustainable and directed the A.O. to verify from the relevant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

yderabad after the merger of all the three subsidiaries and a fresh reference was made by the A.O. i.e., ACIT, Circle (1), Hyderabad to the TPO for determining the arms length price of the international transactions of the assessee company with its AEs. Accordingly, the TPO vide his order dated 28.12.2012 passed under section 92CA(3) of the Act, determined the arms length price of the relevant international transactions of the assessee company with its AE at ₹ 26,15,50,020 as against the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e unit respectively on account of reduction of communication charges from the export turnover. Against the draft assessment order dated 28.02.2013 proposed by the A.O. objections were again filed by the assessee before the DRP challenging the validity of the re-assessment proceedings as well as disputing the additions proposed by the A.O. on merit. The DRP considered the objections of the assessee only in respect of additions proposed by the A.O. on merit and on such considerations, directed the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion to the total income of the assessee only on account of T.P. adjustment. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee has filed this appeal before the Tribunal. 3. We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the material on record. In the grounds raised in this appeal, the assessee has challenged the validity of assessment made by the A.O. as well as the addition made therein on account of T.P. adjustment on merit. In respect of the preliminary issue raised in this appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A to the extent of ₹ 3.17 crores. He has contended that no disallowance under section 10A however having been made by the A.O. in the final order as per the DRP direction and the reference made to the TPO in the original assessment proceedings itself being invalid as the said assessment proceedings were held to be void abinitio in the absence of service of notice under section 143(2) on the assessee within the statutory time limit, the reopening of assessment by the A.O. itself is invalid. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version