Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Asstt. Director of Income Tax & Anr Versus Animal Planet, One Discovery Place & Ans.

Taxability of advertisement revenue & subscription revenue - Tax Treaty between India and USA - Article 27 of Treaty relating to Mutual Agreement Procedure (‘MAP') - rate of tax @10% or 20% - Interest u/s 234B where entire income is subject to TDS u/s 195 - Held that:- The issue has been decided in favour of the assessee by the CIT(A) for AY 2004-05 wherein it was observed that, the Appellant has a PE in India, both Advertisement and Subscription revenues constitute business income of the Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee in India. - Decided against the revenue.

Interest u/s 234B - Following the decision of Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of Jacabs Civil Incorporated [2010 (8) TMI 37 - DELHI HIGH COURT] and the decision of ITAT “C” Bench Delhi in the case of G.E. Energy Parts Inc. [2014 (7) TMI 683 - ITAT DELHI], we are inclined to hold that the CIT(A) was right in holding that the interest u/s 234B of the Act is not leviable in the case of the assessee being nonresident .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant : Smt. A. Misra, CIT DR For the Respondent : Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. ORDER Per Chandra Mohan Garg, JUDICIAL MEMBER The above captioned appeals of the revenue and cross objections of the assessee have been filed against the order of the CIT(A)-XI, New Delhi both dated 19.6.2012 in Appeal No. 57 and 58/10-11 for AY 2004-05 and 2006-07 respectively. The assessee has raised the similarly worded grounds in both the appeals which read as under:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t chargeable in the assessee's case, by relying upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Jacob Civil Incorporated, without appreciating that the levy of interest 234B is mandatory as held in the case of CIT Vs Anjum M.H. Ghaswala & Others 252 ITR 1 (SC). 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to these appeals are that the assessee had filed its return of income for AY 2004-05 on 31.4.2004 declaring at nil income and assessment was finalized at an income of  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns India (DCIN) is a company incorporated in India, under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with whom the assessee company had entered into an Advertising Sales Representation Agreement appointing the DCIN as its exclusive advertising sales representative in India for the purpose of marketing the channel. The consideration for the services rendered under the aforesaid agreement, the assessee paid DCIN commission @15% of the ad sales revenue. By way of a Distribution License Agreement dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

No. 742 issued by the CBDT which required a foreign telecasting company (FTC) not having Permanent Establishment (PE) in India (within the meaning of the relevant Treaty) to compute its income based on the method prescribed therein. Accordingly, since the assessee being an FTC neither had a PE nor it maintained country-wise accounts of its operations in India. Therefore, the aforesaid Circular No. 742 was applicable to the assessee as per contentions of the appellant. 3. Subsequently, Circular N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the AO completed assessment for AY 2004-05 at the total income of ₹ 6,00,31,583. In the similar line, the AO finalised the assessment for AY 2006-07 on 19.12.2008 determining the total income of assessee company at ₹ 7,05,80,097. The AO in both the years made additions to the returned income inter alia on the following grounds:- * DCIN forms a dependent agent PE of the applicant In India (under treaty). • The appellant is not entitled to the treaty benefits. • A sum of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the above assessment orders, the asessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A) which were partly allowed on both the grounds as reproduced hereinabove. Ground No.1 5. Apropos ground no. 1, ld. DR submitted that the CIT(A) has erred in holding that only 10% of Subscription Revenues are taxable as business income against the entire such revenues taxed by the AO as Royalty, without considering that every assessment year is an independent year and further, MAP resolution applies only to the part .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 9(1)(vi) of the Act and rightly taxed the same at 20% of gross basis as per provisions of the Act. Ld. AR also contended that the consideration paid by the assessee company is also covered by the royalty as given in Article 12(3) of the tax Treaty between India and USA. Therefore, action of the AO was quite justified and was based on cogent reasons. 7. Ld. DR further contended that the CIT(A) while dealing with ground no. 3 and 4 of the assessee wrongly computed that the assessee is an PE in I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r attention towards para no. 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the statement of facts submitted before the CIT(A) during the first appellate proceedings and submitted that as per licence agreement between assessee and DCIN after collecting subscription revenue from the cable operator as a right to retain the same and in turn, the DCIN would incur necessary costs for the promotion of the channel and specially when the entire subscription revenues were duly offered to tax by the DCIN in its return of income file .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ange in the facts and circumstances or law position in the subsequent years in taking a different or deviated stand. Ld. Counsel of the assessee further placed copies of the assessment order for AY 2008-09 dated 5.10.2011 assessment order for AY 2009-10 dated 27.11.2011 and assessment order for AY 2010-11 dated 26.2.2014 and submitted that the advertisement and distribution revenues have been consistently taxed by the department @10%, therefore, for the assessment years under consideration in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

group company had earlier invoked the provisions of Article 27 of Treaty relating to Mutual Agreement Procedure ( MAP') for AY 2000-01 and AY 2001-02. A MAP resolution dated January 02, 2006 was thereafter issued for AYs 2000-01 and AY 2001-02. Under the aforesaid MAP resolution, the competent authorities of both India and US had agreed that 10 percent of distribution and advertisement revenues earned by DALLC or DAI from India should be taxable in India, being profits attributable to the de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed 30/09/2010 whereby it was held that:- "Before DRP the assessee has filed a letter dated August 20,2010, wherein it is explained that in the case of a group entity, Discovery Asia Inc, USA ('OAI'). The Competent Authorities of India and US agreed that OAI has a dependent agent PE in India in the form of DCIN. It was resolved that the income of dAI from Advertisement revenues and Subscription revenues be taxed under Article 7 of the Treaty i.e as Business income. The two competent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

usiness income and 10% of Gross Advertisement and Subscription revenues were treated as taxable income in India. Now as we have already concurred with the AO's conclusion that DCIN constitutes the assessee's PE in India for both Advertisement and Subscription revenue, in line with the above MAP order, we hold that both advertisement and subscription revenues constitute assessee's business income and that 10% of the gross advertisement and subscription revenues be treated as taxable i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the two Competent Authorities) and the order of the DRP wherein Advertisement and Subscription revenues were treated as business income and 10'10 of Advertisement and Subscription revenues were treated as taxable income in India. On the basis of the above position, on examination of the documents placed on record by the appellant, and to ensure consistency of assessment over the years, by following the basis of taxability of the Advertisement and Subscription revenues in the other relevant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

years, by following the basis of taxability of the advertisement and subscription revenue constitute business income of the assessee in India and 10% of the advertisement and subscription revenue itself to be treated as taxable income of the assessee in India. We also note that the DRP in the order dated 30.9.2010 for AY 2007-08 for the subsequent assessment year has also adjudicated the issue on the same line which has been followed by the CIT(A) in the impugned orders. Accordingly, we are unab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#39;s case, by relying upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Jacob Civil Incorporated, without appreciating that the levy of interest 234B is mandatory as held in the case of CIT Vs Anjum M.H. Ghaswala & Others (supra). 12. Replying to the above, ld. Counsel of the assessee placing reliance on the decision of ITAT C Bench dated 16.7.2013 in ITA No.6049/Del/2010 and other appeals in the case of ADIT vs G.E. Energy Parts Inc. to which one of us (C.M.Garg, JM) was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

holding that the Tribunal has rightly held that the assessee was not liable to pay any interest u/s 234B of the Act for the failure to pay dividend as per provisions of section 208 and 209 of the Act. 13. On careful consideration of above rival submissions, we note that the CIT(A) has decided the issue in favour of the assessee with following conclusion:- Regarding u/s 234B of the Act, the appellant has submitted that the appellant is a non-resident and tax was deductible u/s 195 of the Act on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version