GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2015 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Demand of interest - respondents admitted duty liability and contested only the interest - violation of conditions of DEEC Advance Licences - import of Polyurethane Spandex Yarn/Lykra - Notification No.204/92-Cus. dt. 19.5.92 - Held that:- Apex court in the order [2008 (3) TMI 8 - SUPREME COURT] has referred and considered the decision of Hon. Bombay High Court of Pratibha Syntex case; By virtue of above High Court and Supreme Court orders, the demand of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nded in the original adjudication order is restored and the impugned order to the extent of giving relief on interest is set aside. - Following decision of Pratibha Syntext Ltd. Vs UOI [2003 (7) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY] - Decided in favour of Revenue. - Appeal No. C/40582/2013 - Final Order No. 40373/2015 - Dated:- 10-4-2015 - Hon ble Shri R. Periasami,J. For the Appellant : Shri M. Rammohan Rao, DC (AR) For the Respondent : Shri Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate ORDER Per R. Peri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and also imposed a penalty of ₹ 34,000/-. The respondent's appeal was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals) and on appeal before Tribunal, the case was remanded to the original authority vide Tribunal's Final Order No.1386-1387/2008 dt. 8.12.2008 for recomputation of duty and penalty. The adjudicating authority in the de novo proceedings vide order dt. 11.5.2013 re-worked out the shortage quantity and re-determined the duty of ₹ 3,44,210/- and also demanded interest @ 15% al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation No.204/92 and also they have not fulfilled the condition as per the bond executed before the licensing authority. Part "G" of Part-I of the Annexure to the notification clearly stipulated a situation where the conditions of the notification are not complied, duty and interest has to be paid. At column No.5 of Part "G" clearly shows an amount of duty and interest paid by the licence holder. Therefore, the Commissioner (Appeals) erroneously held that there is no provision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s UOI 2008 (224) ELT 184 (SC) (2) Pratibha Syntext Ltd. Vs UOI 2003 (157) ELT 141 (Bom.) (3) Sheshank Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI 1996 (88) ELT 626 (SC) (4) Delta Paper Mills Ltd. Vs CCE Guntur 1995 (77) ELT 544 (A.P.) 5. On the other hand, Ld. Advocate for the respondents reiterated the findings of the impugned order. He submits that Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly set aside the interest as there is no authority to recover interest. The words mentioned at clause (ii) (b) of the notification N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nnai Vs Shakshambana Silks Exports (P) Ltd.- 2009 (237) ELT 419 (Tri.-Chennai) 6. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. Revenue filed this appeal against impugned order wherein LAA set aside the interest demanded by the adjudicating authority. I find that the present appeal is second round of litigation. The respondent imported Polyurethane Spandex Yarn/Lykra under DEEC Advance Licences and cleared duty free under Customs Notification No.204/92-Cus. dt. 19.5.92. The DRI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The revenue's contention is that adjudicating authority had rightly confirmed customs duty and interest as the respondent failed to comply with the conditions of the notification as per bond executed. Part-G of Part-I of the Schedule annexed to the said notification clearly indicated duty and interest to be paid in respect of quantity of duty free materials when condition not complied. I find that when the adjudicating authority had discussed the issue of non-fulfilment of obligation in det .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

demand of interest for violation of conditions of Notfn.204/92 stands settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court and Hon'ble High Court of Bombay. In the case of Pratibha Syntext Ltd. Vs UOI (supra), the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay held that customs authorities are entitled to recover customs duty and interest for the breach of Notification No.204/92. The relevant portions of Hon'ble High Court's order is reproduced as under :- "16mption Notification No. 204/92 issued under Sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

notification issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962. Since, there was breach of the terms of the Exemption Notification, the customs authorities were entitled to recover the duty with interest. Merely, because the Commission erroneously or otherwise had not levied interest in his order, it cannot be said that the Customs authorities had no jurisdiction to recover interest. If the petitioners were satisfied with the order of the Commissioner of Customs, there was no need for them to app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his petition, we are not expressing any opinion in that behalf. Therefore, we have no hesitation in holding that once the petitioners committed breach of the terms of the exemption Notification No. 204/92, the Customs authorities were entitled to enforce the declaration with bond and legal undertaking given by the petitioners and recover customs duty with interest. If the customs authorities were entitled to recover duty with interest, then no fault could be found with the Settlement Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es. In this view of the matter, no further opportunity was required to be given to the petitioners. The admission of the petitioners would bind them. Therefore, recovery of duty liability and adjustment thereof with interest was well within the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission. Such order cannot be said to be in breach of principles of natural justice as sought to be faintly canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 23.The rival parties addressed us on extenso so far as the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment Commission to direct recovery of duty with interest as the bond prescribes recovery of duty with interest from the licence holder. So far as rate of interest determined by the Settlement Commission is concerned, the same cannot be said to be arbitrary looking to the prevailing bank rate on deposits. It is not in dispute that rate of interest awarded by the Settlement Commissions is much below rate prescribed in the bond. In the circumstances, no fault can be found with order of the Settleme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ideration is as to whether the term interest used therein would include within its fold interest payable under the bond furnished by the appellant before the Director General of Foreign Trade. 17. The statutory scheme for the purpose of approaching the Settlement Commission and the mode and manner in which appropriate order is to be passed thereupon, are governed by Chapter XIVA of the Act. With a view to enable the Settlement Commission to pass an order, an applicant is required to make a ful .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version