GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (4) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2015 (328) E.L.T. 453 (Tri. - Del.) - Clandestine removal of goods - Duty evasion - Goods removed by the appellant-Company without issue of invoice and without payment of duty - Suppression of production - Imposition of penalty on director of company - Held that:- Recovery of the loose sheets and pencil written ledger from the premises of the appellant in the course of search proved the entries therein as representative of the clandestinely removed goods whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

explained by appellant. That also proved clandestine removal of 81.010 MT of Dolochar by the appellant.

The statement recorded from shift supervisors being self speaking cannot be brushed aside because they were the persons within whose knowledge goods were manufactured and cleared. Their evidence was believable, cogent and credible for the reason that they vividly described methodology of production. - Preponderance of probability was against the appellant. Pleading of no statement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alafide. Therefore, appellant fails on all counts. Revenue s investigating was successful and its suffering was established.

Without human intervention evasion does not occur by an artificial person which is a company - Thus burden of Revenue was considerably lightened by preponderance of probability. Sri Sanjay Agarwal, Director, showed his knowledge about possession of various incriminating evidence by the company. That demonstrated the methodology of evasion - However, penalty on d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ter referred to as the Act ) of the said Act as well as levy of interest. The other appeal relates to imposition of penalty of ₹ 5,00,000/- on the Director of the manufacturing company. 2. During visit by Central Excise officers on 04.10.2006 to the premises of M/s. N.R. Sponge Pvt. Ltd., who is the main appellant, following material facts and evidence surfaced:- (i) The daily stock register was maintained by appellant company upto 30.09.2006. Investigating team asked the Director of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nvestigating team recovered certain loose sheets from factory which related to loading advices and gate passes showing removal of excisable goods. Such sheets were maintained by the appellant for the period from 28.09.2006 to 02.10.2006. On comparison of the entries contained therein with the Central Excise invoices, it was revealed that 562.130 MT of Sponge iron and 81.010 MT of Dolochar were removed by the appellant-Company without issue of invoice and without payment of duty. (iii) Records li .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

04.2007 revealed consumption of raw material which was worked out on the basis of feed rate as well as dip of the bunker. Scrutiny revealed that the appellant-Company had suppressed production of 1580.950 MT of Sponge iron. (iv) Scrutiny of the record mentioned at s.no.22 of the Annexure to the panchnama dated 04.10.2006 which was pencil handwritten ledger revealed that the said ledger contained sale account of Sponge iron indicating the truck number and the payment receipt. When the entries the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thereon. (v) Statement dated 16.03.2007 of Shri Dhananjay Choundhary, Accountant/Cashier of the appellant-Company revealed that the ledger stated above was maintained by him and his subordinate. He also authenticated the photocopy of the ledger. He stated that the entries therein were correct and demonstrates evasion of duty. But he could not reveal whether the ledger in question maintained was with the knowledge Director Shri Sanjay Agrawal. (vi) Statement dated 10.04.2007 of the Director Shri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

admitted that the consignment notes were prepared after unloading of the goods at the destination. After perusal of the disputed consignment notes he confirmed that the quantity of the goods mentioned therein have been transported from the consignor to the consignee resulting in removal of 69.180 MT of Sponge iron without issue of Central Excise invoice. 4. The scrutiny of the bilty books recovered from the business premises of M/s. Giriraj Roadlines, Raipur on 20.12.2006 revealed that the appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecords and documents recovered from the factory premises of M/s. Kailash Traders, Proprietor Shri Kailash Agrawal, a broker/commission agent of iron & steel on 20.12.2006 also confirmed that the appellant-Company had removed a large quantity of excisable goods without payment of duty. 6. The records seized from the various business premises of the appellant-Company and others revealed that the Company had removed 1574.725 MT of Sponge iron valued at ₹ 1,57,27,368/- involving Central Ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nha at the outset submitted that the adjudication order is nothing but a replica of the show-cause notice and what that was reported by investigation was simply endorsed by the adjudicating authority without testing the veracity thereof. The statement recorded from Shift Supervisor is not admissible in evidence because they are incompetent to give such statement. Presumption of arise of 56% of output from an unit of input has no sanction in law for which there cannot be presumption of any unacco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reof. In absence of any evidence, entire allegation of investigation fails. When there was no evidence showing suppression of raw material purchased and no evidence showing unaccounted transport of goods made, the adjudication does not sustain. Similarly, in absence of any excess consumption of electricity and unaccounted labour payment, estimation of the clandestine clearance is uncalled for. There was no cash receipt discovered by investigation to allege unaccounted clearance of the goods. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

did not prove maintenance of any fake record. 7.3 Learned counsel relied on the following case laws:- (a) T.G.L. Poshak Corporation Vs. CCE, Hyderabad 2002 (140) ELT 187 (Tri. Chennai) (b) CCE, Chandigarh I Vs. Shingar Lamps Pvt. Ltd. 2010 (255) ELT 221 (P&H) (c) CCE, Meerut I Vs. R.A. Castings Pvt. Ltd. 2011 (269) ELT 337 (All.) (d) Padala Veera Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors AIR 1990 SC 79 (e) CCE Vs. Vandana Art Prints Pvt. Ltd. 2008 (221) ELT 27 (Guj.) (f) Kumar Trading Comp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the lose sheet recovered in the course of search unerringly proved unaccounted clearance of 562.130 MTs of Sponge Iron and 81.010 MTs of Dolochar. Secondly, the pencil written ledger (Sl. No. 24 of Panchanama dated 4.10.2006) proved unaccounted sales of Sponge Iron with full details of truck number and payment receipts. That corroborated with majority of entries in the excise record and invoices and unrecorded transactions gave raise to demand against 887.560 MT of Sponge Iron escaping duty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was commission agent of the appellant-company and confirmed that the appellant had removed large quantities of excise goods without payment of duty. 8.3. According to Revenue, all the statements recorded from the Shift Supervisor, transporters, Accountant and the Director successfully proved the questionable modus operandi of the appellant, its oblique motive in clearance of clandestinely removed goods. Shortage of finished goods found during physical verification also demonstrated clandestine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the loose sheets and pencil written ledger from the premises of the appellant in the course of search proved the entries therein as representative of the clandestinely removed goods which were well within the knowledge of the appellant. Active involvement of appellant in that regard came to record since those materials were in the custody of the appellant. It is common sense that the materials having utility to the possessor thereof are only possessed by him. He proves ownership thereof and is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

clandestine removal of 69.180 MT of Sponge Iron and 55.855 MT of such goods respectively. Those clearances were not substantiated by excise invoices. When certain entries in the pencil handwritten ledger matched with the central excise invoices and other entries did not match, the unmatched entries, became testimony of clandestine removals not supported by invoices. Accordingly, such clearances became subject-matter of allegation in respect of removal of 887.560 MT of Sponge Iron without payment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the director admitted clandestine removal of the goods not supported by excise invoices. That resulted in loss of revenue. He therefore admitted to make payment of the duty evaded without controverting the Revenue implication of the entries in pencil handwritten ledger and chits recovered from possession of appellant during search. Entire pleading of the appellant therefore failed to sustain when malafide of the appellant came to record. Clandestine removal was well within the knowledge of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ility was against the appellant. Pleading of no statement recorded from buyer, no excess electricity consumption found, no raw material purchase found unaccounted and no input output ratio prescribed by law is of no use to it. Revenue discharged its onus of proof bringing out the allegation in the show-cause notice succinctly. But, the appellant miserably failed to discharge its burden of proof. It did not come out with clean hands. 10.5 It is not only one evidence, but multiple echoed evidence .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ory proves clandestine removal. Similarly, in the case of CCE Vs. International Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. - 2010 (255) E.L.T. 68 (H.P.), the Hon ble Himachal Pradesh High Court held that no person will maintain authentic record of illegal activities. Burden shifts to manufacturer once Department proves something illegal being undertaken. It is elementary jurisprudence that no law can be interpreted in a manner so as to give premium to illegal and criminal activities. Hon ble High Court of Rajasthan in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also. Unless nipped in the bud at the earliest, it is likely to cause turbulence shaking of the socio-economic-political system in an otherwise healthy, wealthy, effective and vibrant society and ultimately, such excise duty or the tax evaders can create a parallel economy in the state which may pose a serious threat to the nation. In the present State of affairs, the economic offences are undoubtedly more grave in nature than those offences which are otherwise said to be grave. Revenue need no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version