Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Jai Maa Appliances (P) Ltd. Versus CCE Chandigarh

Area based exemption - Manufacturing activity or not - Job work - Activity of winding the wire on the stator and thereafter were putting varnish on the wires wound on the stators, receipt of stamping rotors and electrical grade aluminum and also dies and making cast, machined and painted rotors, which were being sent back to the principal manufacturer - Held that:- duty would be chargeable on the goods being made by the appellant on job work basis only if, those goods are in fully finished condi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h regard to sending of semi finished/ raw material to SE for certain job work and hence, it cannot be said that the Department was not aware of the activity of SE. Similarly, in respect of JMAPL, it is seen that during 2004, there was correspondence between them and the Department with regard to the nature of their activity and whether they are eligible for exemption under notification no. 50/03-CE and from this correspondence also it is clear that the Department was aware about the nature of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e and for the same reason, penalty under section 11AC would not be imposable. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - Excise Appeal No. E/48/2009 -Ex[DB], Excise Appeal No. E/451/2010 -Ex[DB] - Final Order No. 50822/50823 /2015-Ex(Br) - Dated:- 12-3-2015 - Hon'ble Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Member (Technical) And Hon'ble Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial),JJ. For the Appellants : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. MS Negi, DR ORDER Per Rakesh Kumar (for the Ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

od from 2004 to 2008 were manufacturing electrical fans. KEL were sending the stators winding wires and top and bottom covers to JMAPL for certain job works. JMAPL were winding the wire on the stator and thereafter were putting varnish on the wires wound on the stators. In respect of top and bottom covers, the same were subjected to some machining. Top and bottom covers after being machined and the stators with copper wire wound on the same and varnished were being returned back by JMAPL to KEL. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st JMAPL and SE along with interest and penalty of equal amount were imposed under section 11AC. The orders in this regard were passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise Chandigarh. Against these orders of the Commissioner, these appeals have been filed. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, the Ld. Counsel for the appellant pleaded, that the items which emerge from the factory of the appellants are not fully finished parts of the fans, that in case of JMAPL they receive the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

annot be called fully finished parts of fans and, hence, the same are not marketable, that in case of SE, they receive the stamping rotors, electrical grade aluminum metal and dies and they fabricate cast and machined rotors which are intermediate product and it is these cast and machined rotors which are sent back to KEL where the same are subjected to further process before being used as part of electrical fans, that in case of SE also, the items which are sent back to KEL cannot be said to fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gard to the availment of duty exemption under this notification. He, therefore, pleaded that the impugned orders are not sustainable. 4. Sh. M S Negi, the Ld. DR, defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner and emphasized that in both the cases the goods which are made by the appellant on job work basis are fully finished parts of the fans and the same are used by KEL without any further process, and hence, the same have to be treated as marketable, and hence, exc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

egard to benefit of exemption under notification no. 50/03-CE, he pleaded that this correspondence was not in respect of this claim of JMAPL for exemption under notification no. 50/03-CE as no such declaration had been filed by JMAPL at that time. With regard to limitation, he pleaded that longer limitation period under proviso to section 11A(1) has been correctly invoked. He accordingly, pleaded that there is no infirmity in the impugned orders. 5. We have considered the submissions from both t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the exemption under this notification. JMAPL received stators, winding wire and top and bottom covers and while the top and bottom covers were subject to machining, in respect of the stator, the job work winding of the wire and thereafter the varnishing was of the stator was done. The stator with wire wound on it and varnished and the machined top and bottom covers were returned by JMAPL to KEL. The point of dispute is as to whether the items which are being returned by JMAPL to KEL are fully .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed goods which require further processing. 6. In both the cases the appellant s claim is that the items being cleared by them to KEL are not fully finished goods but have to be subjected to further processing like grinding, spindle pressing, testing etc. On going through both the orders, it is seen that no finding has been given by the Commissioner on this point. In our view, the duty would be chargeable on the goods being made by the appellant on job work basis only if, those goods are in fully .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it is seen that so far as SE are concerned, there was correspondence between KEL and the Department with regard to sending of semi finished/ raw material to SE for certain job work and hence, it cannot be said that the Department was not aware of the activity of SE. Similarly, in respect of JMAPL, it is seen that during 2004, there was correspondence between them and the Department with regard to the nature of their activity and whether they are eligible for exemption under notification no. 50/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version