Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 Versus M/s. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

2015 (4) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Disallowance u/s 14A - Held that:- A judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [2010 (8) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] wherein held that Rule 8D is prospective and not retrospective. Even otherwise the AO must give finding with respect to the nexus of this expenditure with that of the exempted income before disallowance and must point out to any expenditure, whatsoever, which is relatable to the exem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Held that:- . The Tribunal found that once there is no dispute that such expenditure is incurred and the legal provision not warranting any further capitalisation of the amont and in the books of account, the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner erroneously rejected this claim. The Tribunal has also taken care to observe that when the Assessing Officer found that the expenditure on research and development is eligible for deduction under the same provision in the subsequent year then the vie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this provision and given the factual and admitted position, we do not think that the Tribunal erred in the view that it has taken and hence even with regard to this question. No substantial question of law. - Decided against revenue. - Income Tax Appeal No.1140 of 2013 - Dated:- 9-4-2015 - S. C. Dharmadhikari And A. K. Menon,JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr Arvind Pinto For the Respondent : Mr Sanjiv M Shah ORDER P.C. 1. Parties concede that question No.6.1 in this appeal is covered by a judgment of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s to independently satisfy us that this appeal raises substantial questions of law. 3. Mr. Pinto would submit that the same indeed raises substantial questions of law. In that he projects the questions at pages 5 (6.1, 6.2 and 6.3). 4. However, in relation to para 6.3 he concedes that a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 328 ITR 81 covers the controversy against the Revenue and in favour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessing Officer had not referred to the plain language of section 35. There, the amount which has been incurred for research and particularly scientific research can be claimed. In relation to that at page 80 of the paper-book and from paragraph 11.1 onwards, the Tribunal found that the assessee had incurred expenses on scientific research development which has been recognised by the appropriate authorities. He has shown the expenditure in the books of account as on 31st March, 2003, waiting cap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version