Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 882 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2015 (4) TMI 882 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - [2015] 377 ITR 165 (Bom) - Charge of rental income - business income or income from house property - Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to tax the rental income as 'income from house property' and to allow deduction u/s 24 - ITAT allowed the claim of expenses of ₹ 45 lakhs on account of provision for incomplete work - interest paid as capital brought in by partners - Held that:- We do not think that when the Tribunal relied upon the judgment of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court]. There as well, the property came to be mortgaged and what was before the Supreme Court was the fact that the High Court, with the approval of the assessee and the creditors evolved a scheme where under the business assets of the assessee were let out to M/s. General Fibres Dealers (P) Ltd. It is in that peculiar fact situation that the Supreme Court took the view and with regard to the nature of income. We are of the view that on the essential contentions raised before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penses incurred on that part of the stock and added the same to the income of the assessee. As find the assessee has been following the project completion method and on account of completion of major part of the project, the assessee worked out its profit and offered it to tax. In the P & L account, he claimed a provision of incomplete work of ₹ 45 lakhs relating to unsold premises. While calculating its closing stock, he has taken this figure of cost of provision of incomplete work of  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessing Officer. He has simply disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that the provision of incomplete work should not have been made in the impugned assessment year, without looking to the facts that same cost of incomplete work was taken in the closing stock. Keeping in view of the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that CIT (A) has properly adjudicated the issue in the light of given facts and circumstances of the case. We, therefore, find ourselves in agreement with the Or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that it had concurred with one of those views and that the view with which it concurred prevails, then, we do not think how the Revenue can raise this issue. The issue has been considered bearing in mind the typical factual background. If the entire interest paid on the partners' capital was related to the premises which were let out by the assessee but the construction thereof came from the contributions of the partners, then, the interest was due and payable to them. That interest was payable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ound cannot be considered as a substantial question of law. - Decided against revenue. - Income Tax Appeal No. 375 of 2013, Income Tax Appeal No. 5313 of 2010, Income Tax Appeal No. 5592 of 2010, Income Tax Appeal No. 6230 of 2010, Income Tax Appeal No. 6232 of 2010, Income Tax Appeal No. 6234 of 2010, Income Tax Appeal No. 1498 of 2011 - Dated:- 9-4-2015 - S. C. Dharmadhikari And A. K. Menon, JJ. For the Appellants : Mr. P.C. Chhotaray For the Respondent : Mr. S.C. Tiwari with Ms. Natasha Manga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

artnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It filed its return of income for the assessment year 2000-01 dated 25th October, 2000, declaring total income at ₹ 5,51,81,680/- including rental income of ₹ 45,57,272/- and claimed deduction under section 24(a) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as the IT Act ) of ₹ 11,39,318/-. This claim of the assessee was not accepted by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer treated the rental incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6. 3. The assessee, aggrieved by this order, preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income (Appeals). The Commissioner passed an order on 19th September, 2006 (Annexure C) partly allowing the appeal. The Commissioner concluded that the claim of the assessee of expenses of ₹ 45,00,000/- should have been allowed. Therefore, ground No.5 in the Memo of Appeal before the Commissioner and raised by the assessee came to be accepted. 4. The Commissioner also accepted the ground of the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he other aspect and particularly about the compensation amount. It is common ground that we are concerned with Ground Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 which have been allowed by the Commissioner. 6. It is aggrieved by such an order of the Commissioner that the Revenue approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Bench at Mumbai by filing Income Tax Appeal No.6449/Mum/2006. By the impugned order dated 11th December, 2008, the Tribunal proceeded to dismiss the appeal. 7. Mr. Chhotaray, the learned counsel ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-07. Mr. Chhotaray submits that they arise from the allowance as deduction under section 24(b) of the IT Act as interest on borrowed capital. In Income Tax Appeal No.1504 of 2012 and which pertains to assessment year 2007-08, this additional question of law would also arise according to Mr. Chhotaray. Lastly, he would submit that in Income Tax Appeal No.418 of 2013 also, the additional questions would arise. This appeal pertains to assessment year 2008-09. 9. Thus, it is submitted by Mr. Chhotar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of expenses of ₹ 45 lakhs on account of provision for incomplete work ignoring the fact that there was no incomplete work in the project as is evident from the fact that assessee has received rental income out of closing stock shown by him ? (c) Whether the rental income earned by the assessee is a business income of the assessee earned on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in law, the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in treating the rental income as income from house property when the assessee had not maintained any separate account in respect of the income from the house property and all that the assessee has done was to take out the items of rental receipt and property taxes from the consolidated profit and loss account for separate consideration without taking out the corresponding proportionate expenses relatable to the rented property .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f units or flats for sale, then, the unsold flats or units being given on lease by the firm would not enable it to claim the income derived therefrom as income from House property. Since the business of the firm is of development and construction of property, then, this income and which is derived from the stock of unsold units or flats is business income and ought to be treated as such. Mr. Chhotaray's complaint was that by some jugglery or manipulation of the accounts, the assessee firm cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d that the assessee firm was formed with specific object of construction of buildings with a view to sell the units therein and not letting out the same. A business transaction of leasing of unsold units was thus nothing but a transaction to generate business income. The assessee maintains a consolidated Profit & Loss Account thereby combining its trading and rental receipts. However, to claim the deduction as above, it has taken out the rental receipts and property taxes and shown it under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f deduction, then, no separate deduction can be claimed in respect of any individual item of expenditure pertaining to the rented property. 11. Mr. Chhotaray has relied upon these findings in the Assessment Officer's order and by referring to the Partnership Deed dated 16th March, 1999 (clause 6 page 3 of the same), he would submit that upon examination of all this material, the Assessing Officer rightly concluded that the rental income is taxable as business income. The Profit & Loss Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd the revenue implications are, therefore, enormous. The Revenue, therefore, rightly asserted and by relying on case law that the exploitation of business assets would yield business income. Mr. Chhotaray has submitted that the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Maheshwari Devi Jute Mills (1965) 57 ITR 36; Universal Plast Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 237 ITR 454 and Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Vikram Cotton Mills Ltd. (1988) 169 IT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rm, method of maintaining accounts, then, they should not have been interfered with by both the First Appellate Authority and the Tribunal. Both have lost sight of the fact that no separate accounts are maintained in respect of the properties which have been let out yielding rental income. One consolidated Profit & Loss account is prepared and on the right side of which trade receipts and rent receipts appear. The expenses are common. No separate account of expenses was maintained in respect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd that is why single consolidated account was maintained. 14. If the accounts are maintained in the normal course treating the entire receipts including rental income as business receipts, then, there is no question of claiming deduction under section 24(a). The problem arose when the assessee abruptly deviated from the accounting practice by taking out only two items - rental receipts and property taxes from house property and claimed huge deduction under section 24(a). For the reasons that ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, then, the figures adopted by the assessee should not have been accepted straight away. The Commissioner and the Tribunal ought to have sent the matter back to the Assessing Officer to determine this allowable part of the expenditure and pertaining to the letting out of the premises. That is one more reason for which this Court should set aside these concurrent orders. 16. Then Mr. Chhotaray addressed us on the issue of interest paid as capital brought in by partners. He submits that interest p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

two commercial complexes Mayfair-I and Mayfair-II. The construction was completed in financial years 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 respectively. If the construction was carried out with the contribution of capital by partners and the interest paid on partners' capital as tabulated should be allowed, then, it is important to note that the Assessing Officer's order was set aside and this claim has been allowed by the Commissioner without any deduction. The matter has not been examined by the Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g out of the flats / units as income from house property, then, this itself shows that conflicting claims were made. If the units constitute the stock-in-trade of the firm, then, dealing with such stock-in-trade would generate only business receipts. As the same reasoning has been adopted to disallow the interest claim, then, the conclusion of the Assessing Officer should not have been interfered with. There was actually no interest expenditure incurred on borrowed capital. All such claims were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tain this appeal and allow it. Mr. Chhotaray has pointed out in his written submissions as to how this claim had been elaborated throughout by the Revenue. They have highlighted the conduct of the assessee. For all these reasons he submits that the Commissioner and the Assessing Officer were not in error with regard to this claim and their conclusions were based on the settled legal principles. The existence of the firm and independent of the partners is a principle which has been applied. If th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been completed and let out and, therefore, there was no justification for this provision. A new explanation was given before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal which has been accepted by the said authorities. Therefore, if they were inclined to take a different view, they ought to have sent the matter back to the Assessing Officer. 18. Mr. Chhotaray's submissions have been countered by Mr. Tiwari appearing for the assessee by pointing out that the additional questions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

impugned orders. The only ground on which the Assessing Officer's order was sought to be supported by the Revenue before the Tribunal was that rental income was received from business assets and shown as closing stock. Therefore, the additional two questions proposed for assessment year 2000-01, 2002-03 to 2005-06 and first two additional questions proposed for assessment year 2006-07 are identically worded but do not arise. In any event, non maintenance of a separate Profit & Loss acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

treatment given or not given in the assessee's books of account does not decide the assessee's tax liability. In that regard, reliance is placed on Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Company Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 82 ITR 363 and Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 116 ITR 1. Mr. Tiwari submits that as far as assessment year 2006-07 onwards are concerned, there is no income from sale of apartments. In none of the assessment orders, the Assessing Officer has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

out sale of apartments also. From 2006-07 onwards all apartments have been let out on rent and there is no trading income. For this reason, the deduction of interest under section 24(b) of the Act has been claimed from assessment year 2006-07 onwards and not in earlier years. The Tribunal has duly noted this fact. Mr. Tiwari also relies upon the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and particularly section 13 thereof to submit that interest on capital and taken from the partners is a permissible. The l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the Revenue has substituted the main questions in Income Tax Appeal No.675 of 2013 and Income Tax Appeal No.775 of 2013 because the counsel for the Revenue realises that for these two assessment years, there is no closing stock. Similar, substitution is called for assessment year 2006- 07 also in Income Tax Appeal No.1498 of 2011. In the circumstances, Mr. Tiwari would submit that this Court should only focus on the main question and which is the objection of the Revenue for treating the incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ri submits that the reliance on Universal Plast (supra) by the Revenue is misconceived. There leasing out the factory as distinguished from the factory building was in issue. Whether the income from that should be assessed under the head profits and gains of business or profession or income from other sources was the further aspect under consideration. In that decision the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not consider as to whether such income could be termed as income from house property. Therefor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee's counsel pointed out that we need not separately refer to each and every Memo of Appeal and its annexures. Thus, we are not required to refer to all the Memos of Appeal and the individual facts therein or the view taken by the authorities under the I.T. Act simply because the points or questions raised are common to all of them. We have noted not only the rival stands as emerging from the oral arguments, but from the written submissions only because Mr. Chhotaray submits that the e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income from house property and allowing deduction under section 24 ignoring the fact that the income was received from the business asset (unsold flats) shown as closing stock. The other was the direction of the Commissioner to the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of expenses of ₹ 45 lakhs on account of provision for incomplete work. The Tribunal noted the rival contentions. It found that there is no dispute that the assessee was engaged in construction business and has constructed a c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment Trust Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1961) 42 ITR 49. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held in that case that the assessee company was incorporated with the object of also developing landed properties. The construction of shops and stalls on purchased lands was made and these were let out to different tenants. The question arose as to whether rental income received by the assessee is an income from house property or a business income. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, according to the Tribu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d just because it was received by a company formed with the object of developing and setting up markets or because occupants are not permanent. 22. Then the Hon'ble Supreme Court decisions and rendered later than this judgment in East India (supra) have been referred by the Tribunal including some of the High Court judgments and the parameters laid down therein. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner examined this issue in detail. Para 2.23 of the Commissioner's order with specific ref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tter was viewed differently by the Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal decisions and the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and some of the High Courts and referred by the Commissioner dealt with identical claim. If the assessee company is engaged in the business of construction and real estate development and it earned income in the form of rent from the tenants / lessees to whom the property was let out, then, whether the property is held as stock-intrade or otherwise is not what .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in the assessee's case are identical to some of the decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, then, there is no legal infirmity in the findings of the Commissioner. 23. If the Tribunal also had before it the Profit & Loss account and it referred to the treatment given by the assessee therein, then, we do not find how the Revenue can complain otherwise. 24. We have before us a copy of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of East India Housing (supra). The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Hon'ble Supreme Court has held : The appellant contends that because it is a company formed with the object of promoting and developing markets, its income derived from the shops and stalls is liable to be taxed under section 10 of the Income-tax Act as profits or gains of business and that the income is not liable to be taxed as income from property under section 9 of the Act. The appellant is undoubtedly, under the provisions of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951, required to obtain a lice .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(I) salaries, (2) interest on securities, (3) income from property (4) profits and gains of business, profession or vocation, (5) income from other sources and (6) capital gains. This classification under distinct heads of income, profits and gains is made having regard to the sources from which income is derived. Income-tax is undoubtedly levied on the total taxable income of the taxpayer and the tax levied is a single tax on the aggregate taxable receipts from all the sources; it is not a col .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the latter head. The income derived by the company from shops and stalls is income received from property and falls under the specific head described in section 9. The character of that income is not altered because it is received by a company formed with the object of developing and setting up markets. In United Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, this court explained after an exhaustive review of the authorities that under the scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the heads of i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s porters and watch and protect the building; and also provided certain services such as heating and cleaning to the tenants at an additional charge. The taxing authorities sought to charge the income from letting out of the rooms as receipts of trade chargeable under Schedule D, but that claim was negatived by the House of Lords holding that the rents were profits arising from the ownership of land assessable under Schedule A and that the same could not be included in the assessment under Sched .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing property, the incidence of income derived from the property owned could not be regarded as altered; the income came more directly and specifically under the head property than income from business. The income received by the appellant from shops is indisputably income from property; so is the income from stalls from occupants. The character of the income is not altered merely because some stall remain occupied by the same occupants and the remaining stalls are occupied by a shifting class of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dly missed and escaped the attention of the Tribunal would enable us to take any different view. Even if what has been emphasised by Mr. Chhotaray is taken into account, what the underlying test and as evolved throughout is whether the income has been derived from property. The treatment given in the books of account as stock-in-trade would not, therefore, alter the character or the nature of the income as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. If there is a test and which is in the field and em .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the case of Universal Plast Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (1999) 237 ITR 454. There, the facts emerging from the judgment itself denote that the assessee set up a factory styled as UPL Factory for carrying on the business of manufacturing PVC sheets and allied products. The assessee suffered losses for two years. It then entered into an agreement styled as leave and licence agreement with M/s. Leatherite Industries Limited for a period of seven years commencing on 30th March, 1977. Thi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wn by the assessee as part of the business income. The Income-tax Officer did not accept that it was business income and assessed the same as income from other sources. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), however, accepted the plea of the assessee that it was its business income and allowed the appeal on 27th April, 1985. The Revenue unsuccessfully appealed against the order of the appellate authority before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. However, the Tribunal drew up a statement of ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

noted and thereafter the judgments of the Supreme Court in the field. It is thereafter that the propositions have been summarised and which read as under : (1) no precise test can be laid down to ascertain whether income (referred to by whatever nomenclature, least,amount, rents, licence fee) received by an assessee from leasing or letting out of assets would fall under the head Profits and gains of business or profession ; (2) it is a mixed question of law and fact and has to be determined fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee is carrying out his other business activities, then it is a case of exploiting the business assets otherwise than employing them for his own use for making profit for that business; but if the business never started or has started but ceased with no intention to be resumed, the assets also will cease to be business assets and the transaction will only be exploitation of property by an owner thereof, but not exploitation of business assets. 27. We cannot ignore the fact that when the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

held that it is important to lay down a precise test as to whether an income be given the nomenclature, lease amount, rents, licence fee received by an assessee from leasing or letting out of assets would fall under the head Profits and gains of business or profession . Pertinently the Supreme Court held that it is a mixed question of law and fact and has to be determined from the point of view of a businessman in that business, on the facts and in the circumstances of each case, including true .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es indicate that the matter has to be approached by referring and taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case. These are not general tests or rules which have been laid down. They have been evolved and that is how we do not think that reliance by the Revenue on this decision would carry the matter any further. Equally, we do not think that any factual aspect and particularly on the conduct of the assessee and the treatment or non treatment in the books of account would carry the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

provision and whether that is applicable to the facts and circumstances of a given case. Similarly, we do not think that the reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income- tax vs. Maheshwari Devi Jute Mills Ltd. would assist the Revenue. The Madras High Court case ought to be then noticed. There, the assessee was a company carrying on business as authorised dealers in Tata diesel vehicles in a building on Mount Road in Madras. The building consi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to its shifting of branches outside Madras was let out. The Income-tax Officer rejected the contention and treated this income as income from property disallowing the deduction claimed under the head business towards repairs. The matter was carried by the assessee before the Tribunal and it allowed the claims. On a reference by the Tribunal, the Hon'ble High Court of Madras held that as the building in question was a commercial asset, the assessee could exploit it either by itself or by le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

very beginning as such, then, the letting out of the second floor premises and the income derived by way of rent therefrom was rightly assessable under the head business income . In holding and taking the above view, the Hon'ble Madras High Court distinguished the judgments and particularly in the case of East India Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. We do not think that such a view and essentially confined to the facts of that assessee's case would enable the Court on the Revenue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng that we can allow any mixed questions to be raised for the first time, raising them does not enable the Revenue to urge and contrary to what is held by the Tribunal. 30. The position also appears to be identical in the case dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Vikram Cotton Mills Limited. There as well, the property came to be mortgaged and what was before the Supreme Court was the fact that the High Court, with the approval of the assessee and the cred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unt of incomplete work is concerned, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has shown the sale of 44,960 sq. feet and the remaining 76,106 sq. feet was shown as closing stock on which the assessee claims to have earned rental income. It disallowed ₹ 45 lakhs as expenses incurred on that part of the stock and added the same to the income of the assessee. 32. The Commissioner found that in the Profit & Loss account, the assessee had offered the profit of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

required to be incurred and are allowable have been debited to the Profit & Loss account in accordance with the matching principle of accounting then the entire provision for incomplete work amount had been actually paid, the proportionate amount of provision of incomplete work of ₹ 45 lakhs relating to unsold premises had been carried forward. This explanation which was given by the assessee was carefully examined and the Commissioner being convinced with it, allowed the claim. The C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

offered it to tax. In the P & L account, he claimed a provision of incomplete work of ₹ 45 lakhs relating to unsold premises. While calculating its closing stock, he has taken this figure of cost of provision of incomplete work of ₹ 45 lakhs. It is an undisputed fact that in the case of project completion method the project is deemed to have been completed on its completion and sale of its 80%. The remaining portion of 20% is under either renovation or under sale. The common area .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the closing stock. Keeping in view of the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that CIT (A) has properly adjudicated the issue in the light of given facts and circumstances of the case. We, therefore, find ourselves in agreement with the Order of the CIT (A). Accordingly, we confirm the same. 33. We do not think that the Assessing Officer's view having been interfered with in such a scenario that any substantial question of law arises for our determination and consideration. Thus, the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not to have granted them when the conduct of the assessee was mala fide. The assessee claimed this deduction by giving conflicting versions. The assessee could not have argued in one matter while claiming deduction under section 24(a) and adopted a contrary position with regard to the claim under section 24(b). The argument is that the claim was made for the first time in the assessment year 2006-07. The explanation given is that this claim was not made in the initial years because in those year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tal, the amount of any interest payable on such capital. Provided that in respect of property referred to in subsection (2) of section 23, the amount of deduction shall not exceed thirty thousand rupees : Provided further that where the property referred to in the first proviso is acquired or constructed with capital borrowed or after the 1st day of April, 1999 and such acquisition or construction is completed within three years from the end of the financial year in which capital was borrowed, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e on such capital. The proviso, and particularly the second proviso stipulates that where the property referred to in subsection (2) of section 23 is acquired or constructed with capital borrowed on or after 1st April, 1999 and such acquisition or construction is completed within three years from the end of the financial year in which the capital was borrowed, the amount under this claim shall not exceed ₹ 1,40,000/-. This proviso and the explanation thereafter has not been pressed into se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ument was that this deduction was already allowed by the Assessing Officer while assessing the rental income as business income. This ground was taken with a view that the rental income would be treated as income from house property and then as a natural corollary the interest paid on the amounts borrowed for the construction of the property should be allowed as a deduction against the rental income. Since ground Nos.1 and 2 pertained to the rental income and taxing the same as income from house .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stock was shown as Nil. The Tribunal presumed that the entire income is related to the premises which were let out by the assessee. Therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the order of the Commissioner. 38. However, Mr. Chhotaray has invited our attention to the Memo of Appeal in Income Tax Appeal No.1504 of 2012. He highlighted the substituted question of law and submits that there the Commissioner had not granted such a claim. 39. In that regard, we have perused the order passed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on from another. There must be a real transaction of borrowing and lending in order to amount to any borrowing. Where there is no relationship of borrower and lender, no deduction is permissible towards interest. In the instant case, the assessee's business was to construct flats or commercial units and sell them at profit. The partners of the firm had subscribed capital for the purpose of business and interest deduction to partner from business income has been allowed over the years. The pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld that the assessee had borrowed amounts for business (banking business) and was utilised for construction of properties, interest was not allowable deduction under section 24(i)(vi). Where the assessee was a partner of a firm and on dissolution of the firm, it took over all assets and liabilities including a building, another judgment was relied upon and rendered by the High Court of Punjab & Harayana in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Four Fields (P) Ltd. (1998) 96 Taxman 143 w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has been created under the head Income from house property . Since the amount is held as not a borrowing for the purposes of section 24(b), the question of nexus between the capital contribution of the partners and its use for acquisition / construction of relevant properties is not relevant. He, therefore, confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer by such reasoning. 40. While carrying the matter to the Tribunal, the assessee specifically urged that the Commissioner erred in rejecting his cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpugned order of the learned CIT(Appeals) confirming the disallowance made by the AO on account of the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 24(b) for interest paid on partners' capital account by relying on the various reasons given in the impugned order, the learned counsel for the assessee has filed a written submission to meet satisfactorily each and every point raised by the learned CIT(Appeals) while confirming the disallowance made by the AO on account of assessee's claim for ded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er, the entire interest paid on the partners' capital was related to the premises which were let out by the assessee and the same, therefore, was allowable as deduction u/s 24(b) while computing income of the assessee under the head Income from house property . Respectfully following the said decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for assessment year 2006-07, we direct the AO to allow the claim of the assessee for deduction on account of interest paid on partners' capital u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version