Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commercial Tax Officer Versus M/s. Jyoti Electronics

2015 (4) TMI 999 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Denial of input tax credit - Demand of differential tax - Held that:- Tax Board, after appreciation of evidence and factual finding, has come to the conclusion that the assessee sold goods to the ultimate consumers on discounted amount and it was none of the business of the Revenue to interfere in the affairs of the assessee. Even if the assessee sells goods at a loss at least revenue should not have grudge or concern. It is also not debarred under the sales tax law and/or VAT law to sell the go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reciation of evidence on record and I do not find any infirmity or perversity in the order impugned so as to call for interference of this Court - Decided against Revenue. - SB Sales Tax (VAT) Revision Petition No. 63/2014 - Dated:- 18-3-2015 - J. K. Ranka,J. For the Petitioner : Mr Nitin Jain, Counsel For the Respondent : Mr Achinta Kaushik, Counsel ORDER 1. Instant petition by the petitioner-Revenue is directed against order passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer (for short, 'Tax Board&# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot satisfied with the claim of the respondent-assessee as Input Tax Credit having been taken on the higher side than the ultimate sale value to the consumers and accordingly, levied differential tax. 3. The matter was challenged by the respondentassessee before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) [for short, 'DC(A)'], who, after analyzing the material on record, allowed the appeal by holding that the Input Tax Credit has rightly been claimed by the respondent-assessee. 4. The petitioner-Re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax Credit could not have been claimed at the same figure than what had been shown in the sale value and thus the Tax Board was unjustified in coming to the said conclusion and contended that question of law arise out of the order of the Tax Board and needs consideration. 6. Per-contra, ld. counsel for the respondent-assessee contended that the Input Tax Credit was rightly claimed and it was for the assessee to manage its affairs as it was aware that it would be receiving discount and accordingl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version