Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Solidus Hi Tech Products Pvt Ltd Versus State of Karnataka, Commr. of Commercial Taxes, Jt Commissioner of Comml. Taxes (ADM) , Deputy Commissioner of Comml. Taxes (Audit)

Reopening of assessment - Cancellation of assessment orders - Held that:- Considering the language and the provisions of S.63 A of the KVAT Act, once the order of cancellation of the assessment order had been passed by the Revisional Authority, it could not proceed to pass a fresh assessment order but could only direct the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment order. - With the coming into force of the amendment made with effect from 1.4.2013 in the KVAT Act whereby the word 'or’ has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the firm opinion that this is a case where the Revisional Authority has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction in proceeding to reassess the case and to that extent, the order passed by the Revisional Authority is wholly unjustified in law and liable to be quashed - earlier part of the order which relates to the reasons for cancellation or setting aside the assessment order is affirmed and is not being interfered with. - Decided partly in favour of assessee. - Writ Appeals 805-840/2015 (T-Res) - Dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which the tax paid by the assessee appellant was at the rate of 4% on the sales of parts of UPS. On the basis of the return filed by the appellant for the aforesaid period, the assessment was deemed to have been accepted, however, the matter was reopened for reassessment under S.39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act for short) and by order dated 5.4.2010, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bangalore did not find any discrepancy in respect of input tax or output tax .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, proceeded to pass reassessment order under S.63 A of the KVAT Act. Challenging the said order, the appellant filed WPs 5031-33 / 2015 and 5955-87/2015 which have been dismissed by the learned Single Judge by judgment and order dated 13.12.2015 on the ground of availability of alternate remedy to the petitioner/appellant of filing an appeal before the Tribunal under S.63 of the KVAT Act. Aggrieved by the same, these writ appeals are filed. We have heard Sri Sarangan, Sr. Advocate appearing alon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs, the Revisional Authority could not have proceeded to pass a fresh assessment order and the only option left under S.63 A of the KVAT Act for the Revisional Authority was to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. It is thus contended that to the extent of passing a fresh assessment order, the impugned order passed by the Revisional Authority was wholly without jurisdiction and as such, the availability of alternate remedy would not be a ground on which the writ petit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evision. S.63 A of the KVAT Act provides for revisional powers for the Joint Commissioner. The relevant sub-section (1) of S.63 A is reproduced below: S:63-A: Revisional Powers of Joint Commissioner (1) The Joint Commissioner may on his own motion call for and examine the record or any order passed or proceeding recorded under this Act and if he considers that any order passed therein by any officer, who is not above the rank of a Deputy Commissioner, is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant that once the assessment order was cancelled by the Revisional Authority, it was not left with any other option but to direct for fresh assessment which could only be done by the Assessing Officer and not the Revisional Authority. In the later part of sub-section (1) of S.63 A of the KVAT Act, earlier the provision was for canceling the assessment order or directing for a fresh assessment. But, by amendment which came into effect from 1.4.2013, the word 'or was substituted by the word .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes - (2001) 124 STC 265 wherein while considering the provisions of S.22 A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act which are para materia to S.63 A of the KVAT Act, 2003, it was held that once the order of the Assessing Officer was set aside, it would be impermissible for the Revisional Authority to re-do the assessment / fresh assessment. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the powers of the Revisional Authority under S.63 A of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

counsel for the respondents, is only illustrative and not exhaustive. It is thus contended that merely because the Revisional Authority has power for directing a fresh assessment, it would not take away the power of the Revisional Authority in passing the fresh assessment order itself, if the circumstances of the case justify the same. It is submitted that in the present case, the facts justified passing of a fresh assessment order by the Revisional Authority. Having heard the learned counsel f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in the case of Shankar Constructions Company (supra), is identical to the provisions of S.63 A of the KVAT Act as it existed prior to the amendment of 2013 and the word used in the last sentence was 'or and not 'and , which has been substituted in the KVAT Act, by amendment of 2013. The same would be significant as it would make it further clear that the option to reassess was not there with the Revisional Authority. However, even while considering that after canceling the assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s canvassed by them. We do consider that the point of law raised is one of importance because it touches the all important question as to whether the revisional authority is invested with unfettered omnipotent powers or whether there is a definite limitation to the exercise of that power and if so what. While we have no hesitation in accepting the greater part of the submissions canvassed by the learned Government Advocate that the revisional authority does have wide powers exercisable in cases .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessing officer and to redo the assessment or pass a fresh assessment order. In the first instance, it is necessary to highlight the fact that the statutory powers are necessarily circumscribed by the wording of S.22A and this section unequivocally indicates that if reassessment is necessary that the revisional authority can only direct reassessment. We do not need to re-emphasise the fact that the Legislature obviously and in our opinion very correctly intended that everything short of a reass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is a highly placed authority of the department, is to exercise the powers of doing a fresh assessment, then the right of appeal, revision etc., is totally annihilated and this could never be the intention of the Legislature. It is therefore abundantly clear to us that the objection canvassed before us by the appellant s learned counsel is well-founded and that the same is liable to be upheld. We see no reason to disagree with the view expressed by the Division Bench in the aforesaid case. With .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version