Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Alarsin Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I

2015 (5) TMI 67 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Eligibility of CENVAT credit - non registration as Input service distributor (ISD) - Business Auxiliary Services - whether the service rendered by the service provider for the products manufactured in Gujarat and invoices raised can be availed as CENVAT Credit at Mumbai - Held that:- there is no dispute as regards the services received by the appellant for the activity and service tax liability having been discharged by the service provider, omission to take registration as an Input Service Dist .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AD) of Division Bench is binding on me and following the same I find that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and I do so. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No.E/85658, 85820/13-Mum - Dated:- 1-4-2015 - M. V. Ravindran, Member (J),J. For the Appellants : Ms Pamavati Patil & Ms Mani Prakash, Advs. For the Respondent : Shri N N Prabhudesai, Supdt. (AR) ORDER Per: M V Ravindran: This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. BR(8)MI/2013 dated 7.01.2013. 2. Heard both side .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Revenue that service tax paid on the services rendered for the marketing of the produced in Gujarat needs to be denied proportionately. Both the lower authorities recorded their findings that the appellant could not have utilized CENVAT credit at Mumbai for the products manufactured and cleared from Gujarat. The lower authorities have also held that marketing services are not interconnected with the manufacturing of the goods. 4. Learned Counsel would take me through the facts of the case and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gistered and distributed the service tax credit availed as ISD. 6. On considering the submissions made by both sides and perusal of the records, I find that as to CENVAT Credit availed on the service tax paid by the service provider is not in dispute and the services were rendered to the appellant. The only dispute is that whether the service rendered by the service provider for the products manufactured in Gujarat and invoices raised can be availed as CENVAT Credit at Mumbai. I find that when t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version