Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU Versus Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd

Appeal admitted by the High Court on the following grounds:

(1) Whether on the facts andin the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in holding that notional sales tax exemption amount of ₹ 38,62,33,200/- is a capital receipt not liable to income tax?

(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in allowing as a revenue deduction the contribution of ₹ 40,25,388/- made by the Assessee Company to v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ribunal, Bench at Mumbai, dated 29th June,2012. 2. The Tribunal was dealing with four Appeals and out of which two were filed by the assessee and two were filed by the revenue. They pertain to two assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. 3. Mr. Suresh Kumar appearing for the revenue in support of this Appeal submits that the substantial questions of law as proposed and from page 7 of the paper book arise for determination and consideration in the admitted factual backdrop. He would submit that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer did not accept the contention of the assessee company that the sales tax exemption was a capital receipt not chargeable to tax and determined this amount as a revenue receipt. 5. We need not advert to the rival contentions on this point or issue because in all fairness both sides have pointed out that one of the substantial question of law as proposed in the present Appeal is already admitted by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.4157/2009 and between the same parties. In such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n relation to the question no. (B) Mr. Mistri would invite our attention to the discussion in the Tribunal's order. He would submit that the Tribunal in relation to this question has done nothing except relying upon the earlier orders and for assessment years 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03. Therefore, the factual findings in earlier orders bind the revenue. There is no distinction or difference pointed out either before the Tribunal or this Court. In such circumstances, question no.(B) be not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng details of the donation/contribution. Similar contribution was made for earlier assessment years. The Tribunal relied upon certain decisions rendered by it and the High Court of Karnataka. This expenditure was held to be revenue in nature. In that regard, at paragraph 14 of the Tribunal's order (running page 109 and 111) we find that the Tribunal has merely followed and applied its earlier orders for prior assessment years in case of this very assessee and on the same question. Therefore, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Dahej to Vadodra Pipeline Project by making one time payment of ₹ 102,03,43,311/-, then, the assesse company had purchased a commercial right to operate and maintain the to terminate the build, own, operate, transfer contract with M/s. Dodsal Ltd. for its Dahej to Vadodra Pipeline Project by making one time payment of ₹ 102,03,43,311/-, then, the assesse company had purchased a commercial right to operate and maintain the pipeline. Therefore, such asset was clearly capital in nature .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion to these questions, Mr. Mistri would submit that the factual findings of the Tribunal are in consonance with the law laid down and repeatedly by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He relies upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. Madras Auto Service(P.) Ltd. reported in (1998) 233 ITR 468. He submits that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has earlier laid down the principle as to when an expenditure could be said to be capital or revenue in natur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s very sum, if paid in terms of the earlier contractual stipulation can be treated as revenue expenditure. The pipeline is not owned by the assessee company. The pipeline is laid by other legal entity and what the assessee obtained for itself is a right to use it. For that purpose, the agreement was executed and one of the terms pertain to payment. The payment was to be made monthly. Now, the Assessee has derived some benefit by making lump sum payment and for the entire contractual period. Ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion to the assessee's agreement with M/s. Dodsal Ltd. The Assessing Officer was of the view that the expenditure on payment of lease rent and maintenance of the pipeline as per the original BOOT agreement with Dodsal Ltd. has resulted in commercial advantage or benefit of enduring nature to the assessee in the form of operation and maintenance of the pipeline. The Assessing Officer was of the view that after termination of the agreement with M/s. Dodsal Ltd. and making one time payment of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, approached the Tribunal and the Tribunal's attention was invited to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court right from the case of Assam Bengal Cement Co. V/s. CIT (1955) 27 ITR 34 and equally the judgment in the case of Madras Auto Service (supra) where very extensive arguments were canvassed. The Tribunal found that the contract with M/s. Dodsal Ltd. was of December 1995. Pursuant thereto, Dodsal built, maintained and operated the Dahej Gandhar Vadodara pipeline for an approximat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing. Nothing of this nature transpired and the agreement continued. The pipeline was vital for the operations and functions of the assessee and, hence, when the present assessee company stepped in it decided to take a commercial decision. It made a lump sum payment of the above sum. This payment was made in the 3 years, namely, financial year ending 31st March, 2001, 31st March, 2002 and 31st March,2003. The Tribunal held that there is no dispute that the payments were allowed as revenue expendi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ownership of the pipeline. Even after reconstructing of the agreement, the ICICI Ltd. stepped in. The other position has not changed. Now the ICICI Ltd. claimed the ownership rights and the assessee only got control of the operation and maintenance of the pipeline which is stated to be vital for its operation and functioning. 15. We find that the Tribunal's discussion and reasoning in paras 24 to 26 of the impugned judgment rightly follows the principles laid down in the case of M/s. Madras .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad, Bangalore for a period of 39 years commencing from 1-1-1966. Under the terms and conditions of the lease, the lessee (that is to say the assessee), had the right to demolish at its own expense the existing premises and appropriate to itself all the material thereof without paying to the lessors any compensation and construct a new building thereon to suit the purpose of their business as per the plan approved by the lessors Under clause 2 of the lease deed, the lessee was required to pay a r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct to the payment of rent and observation of other terms and conditions of the lease. The lessee shall not be entitled under any circumstances for any compensation whatsoever on account of its putting up the new construction in the place of the old. Acting under the lease agreement the assessee invested a sum of ₹ 1,62,835 in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1968-69 and ₹ 50,937 during the succeeding year in constructing a new building on the said land. The assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial point of view. What advantage did the assessee get by constructing a building which belonged to somebody else and spending money for such construction? The assessee got a long lease of a newly constructed building suitable to its own business at a very concessional rent. The expenditure, therefore, was made in order to secure a long lease of new and more suitable business premises at a lower rent. In other words, the assessee made substantial savings in monthly rent for a period of 39 years .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue expenditure. Expenditure may be treated as properly attributable to capital when it is made not only once and for all, but with a view to bringing into existence an asset or an advantage for the enduring benefit of a trade. If what is got rid of by a lump sum payment is an annual business expenses chargeable against revenue, the lump sum payment should equally be regarded as a business expenses, but if the lump sum payment brings in a capital asset, then, that puts the business on another foo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee did not acquire any capital asset. The only advantage which the assessee derived by spending the money was that it got the lease of a new building at a low rent. From the business point of view, therefore, the assessee got the benefit of reduced rent. The High Court has, therefore, rightly considered this as obtaining a business advantage. The expenditure is, therefore, to be treated as revenue expenditure. All these cases have looked upon expenditure which did bring about some kind of an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spending the said amounts did not belong to the assessee but the assessee got the business advantage of using modern premises at a low rent, thus saving considerable revenue expenditure for the next 39 years, both the Tribunal as well as the High Court have rightly come to the conclusion that the expenditure should be looked upon as revenue expenditure." 16. In the circumstances, therefore, we do not find that merely making a lump sum payment and in the above sum alters the factual position .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the revenue's view point. If the registration fees and stamp duty are nothing but a duty on the instrument and not on the transaction covered by the instrument, then, there was no necessity to apportion the expenditure in that behalf. The registration fees and stamp duty are on the lease transactions entered by the assessee with M/s. ICICI Ltd. The expenditure in that regard has been allowed in the first year itself and we do not think that the Tribunal has in any manner deviated from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ses and, therefore, acquired a new and different advantage and which is of optimum user and expenditure of relocating and to the tune of ₹ 24.87 lakhs was capital in nature. 19. We are unable to agree with Mr. Suresh Kumar. In paras 40 to 45 of the impugned order, the Tribunal found that there is absolutely no change in the position and which it noted in para 45. It held that the reactor which was installed at a new place is the existing one. It was procured by the assessee in the year 199 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nistration and modernization of its machinery with a view to obtain maximum benefit out of the existing resources, even that expenditure is allowable in nature. It could not be treated to be a capital one. The expenditure was incurred to improve the production of the existing project, to improve the facilities and obtain increase in profitability by the use of existing assets and resources. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's conclusion while reversing that of the Assessing Officer cannot .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t every expenditure of this nature is not deductible. The only expenditure which could be claimed is the one which is stipulated by section 36(1) clause (v) and (va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Admittedly, making a contribution towards a club or association of the staff members is not a permissible expenditure and on basis of which a deduction can be claimed. Therefore, and since an identical question has been admitted by the High Court of Gujarat, then, this Court should proceed to admit this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bursement of certain expenses incurred. He would submit that the view taken by the Division Bench of this Court in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. binds us. This is nothing but a claim for deduction towards staff sports and welfare expenses. The staff has incurred these expenses and for a avowed object. The employees of the Corporation and companies like assessee take part in various tournaments and cultural or sports activities. Therefore, this is a matter completely covered by the view taken .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l has relied upon is the contribution of ₹ 40,25,388/- to various clubs ran by and meant for the employees at Dodsal and other stations and sums were paid as an employer and which are not allowable. The stand of the assessee was that this expenditure was incurred to facilitate the management of various activities of employees or their family. The Tribunal considered the arguments and particularly that in the earlier assessment years the very issue was considered by it and that the Commissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: REGISTRETION

Notification: Absolute Exemption from IGST on inter-State supplies of goods

Notification: CGST Rate Schedule u/s 9(1) - notifying rates of CGST @ 2.5%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 1.5% and 0.125% on Supply of Goods

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version