Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

SAI CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT LTD Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CIRCLE 4 (1)

2015 (5) TMI 278 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - non deduction of tds under section 195, thus disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) - Held that:- Specific questions were asked by the Assessing Officer regarding the expenditure in foreign currency, which shall be inclusive of the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies and Bhupendra Singh and even the reasons for non-deduction of tax with supporting evidence and the petitioner assessee furnished necessary documents with supporting reasons why the tax at source has not been deduct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a ground for issuing notice under section 148 for reassessment.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the initiation of the reassessment proceedings is nothing but a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer and as per the catena of decision of this Hon'ble Court the impugned notice under section 148 of the Act to reopen the assessment even within a period of four years is not permissible, but deserves to be quashed and set asi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14 issued by the respondent herein, by which the assessment for AY 2009-2010 is sought to be reopened in exercise of powers under section 147 of the Act. 2. That by impugned notice at Annexure A to the petition, the assessment for AY 2009-2010 is sought to be reopened on the reasons to believe that the income chargeable to tax for AY 2009-2010 has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Act. On the reasons recorded for reopening asked by the assessee, the petitioner has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

BS Soparkar, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has vehemently submitted that the impugned notice of reopening the assessment for AY 2009-2010 issued under section 148 of the Act is absolutely illegal, wholly without jurisdiction and invalid. 3.1 It is further submitted that as such, the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment is nothing but a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, which is not permissible. 3.2 It is vehemently submitted by Shri Soparkar, learned a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent. It is submitted that the issue with respect to non-deduction of tax on the amount paid to the foreigners was already deliberated by the Assessing Officer during the original assessment proceedings and specific queries were raised to which the petitioner furnished the relevant documents/evidences including the certificate of the concerned chartered accountant. 3.3 It is further submitted that even the amendment to section 195 of the Act, which was amended by section 9 of the Finance Act, 201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ench of this Court in the case of Cliantha Research Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad Circle - I reported in [2013] 35 taxmann.com 61 (Gujarat) as well as the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in case of Classic Network Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -1 reported in [2014] 45 taxmann.com 234 (Gujarat) in support of his above submissions and in support of his prayer to allow the present Special Civil Application and to quash and set aside the impu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to 5 companies as fees for technical service. However, it did not deduct TDS under section 195 on the plea that the said companies were registered outside India and did not have permanent establishment in India and services rendered and utilized were outside India. It is submitted that the Assessing Officer also similarly noticed that payment of ₹ 25.29 lac to one Bhupendra Singh was not subjected to TDS on the plea that he is non resident in India and his services rendered were utilized o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ervices in India. It is submitted that therefore, the Assessing Officer found that the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies as well as Bhupendra Singh had accrued in India and therefore, on the aforesaid amount, TDS under section 195 of the Act was liable to be deducted, which the assessee did not deduct and therefore, considering the provisions of section 40(a)(i) of the Act, said amount of expenditure was liable to be disallowed due to failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essing Officer also did not address itself and/or did not raise any question whether the payment made to the aforesaid 5 companies and Bhupendra Singh for the services provided by them was technical service or not. It is submitted that therefore, when they have reasoned to believe that the amount of income has escaped assessment and they have formed an opinion and by recording reasons when the reassessment proceedings have been initiated, the same is absolutely just and proper. It is submitted t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h costs. 5 Heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length. 5.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that the reassessment proceedings have been initiated by the Assessing Officer and the assessment for AY 2009-2010 is sought to be reopened in exercise of powers under section 47 of the Act within a period of four years from the date of relevant assessment year for the reasons recorded as under: IMAGE NO. 1 As per section 195(1) of the Act. any person responsi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er amended provision of section 9 vide Finance Act, 2010, w.r.e.f. 1-6- 1976 explanation was amended read as For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this section, income of a non-resident shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India under clause (v) or clause (vi) or clause (vii) of sub-section (1) and, shall be included in the total income of the nonresident. whether or not, - (i) The non resident has a residence or place of business connection in India; or (ii) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessed at ₹ 5,55,76,400 vide order dated 07.12.2011. It was noticed from P/L, 3CD and details regarding project work expenditure that assessee had paid a total sum of ₹ 396.93 Iakh to 5 companies as fees for technical services. It did not deduct TDS u/s 195 on the plea that these companies were registered outside India and did not have permanent establishment in India and services rendered and utilized were outside India. Similarly. payment pf ₹ 25.29 Iakh to Bhupendra Singh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ieve that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 5.2 Thus, from the aforesaid, it appears that the Assessing Officer has reopened the assessment for AY 2009-2010 on the ground that in view of the amended provisions w.e.f. 1976, the income was required to be treated as income accrued in India i.e. with respect to amount paid to 5 companies and one Bhupendra Singh and therefore, TDS was required to be deducted under section 195 of the Act and the petitioner asseessee failed to deduct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be noted that when the petitioner - assessee filed return of income for AY 2009-10, it declared income of ₹ 4,91,50,842/-. The petitioner assessee in the return of income specifically claimed deduction with respect to the payment made to the aforesaid 5 foreign companies as well as Bhupendra Singh including other expenses also. The case was selected for scrutiny and the notice under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were issued and served upon the petitioner from time to time. It is required to b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer asked the following question/particulars from the assessee. 2. Expenditure in foreign currency (Point No.8 of Schedule - 21) It is observed from audited balance sheet that during the year under consideration, the assessee Company has incurred the following foreign expenditure- IMAGE NO. 2 In this regard, the assessee company is required to submit the following details:- i. Name, address of party and amount incurred. ii. Chartered accountant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bank details of foreign remittance. That thereafter, the Assessing Officer finalized the assessment and allowed the expenses as claimed including the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies as well as Bhupendra Singh and did not make any addition by disallowing the expenses under section 40(a)(i) of the Act on the ground that with respect to the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies as well as Bhupendra Singh, the income had accrued in India and there was a failure on the part of the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come of a non-resident shall be deemed to have accrued or arise in India under clause (v), clause (vi) and clause (vii) of sub section (1) of section 195 and shall be included in the total income of non resident whether or not; (1) the non resident has a residence or place of business connection in India; or (2) the non resident has rendered services in India and therefore, the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies and one Bhupendra Singh, who are non resident were deemed to have accrued in I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y disallowing the expenses under section 40(a)(i) of the Act on the ground that there was a failure on the part of the assessee not to deduct the TDS on the amount paid to the aforesaid 5 companies and Bhupendra Singh, it can safely be said that it is nothing, but a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. It is required to be noted that when the Assessing Officer passed original assessment order, by the time, section 9 already amended by Finance Act, 2010 w.e.f. 1.6.1976 was very much there. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessment was very much there and therefore, the Division Bench observed and held that such provision being always there on record and the Assessing Officer having already scrutinized the entire issue threadbare, even though notice is issued within four years from the end of the relevant assessment years, issuance of such notice has to be held as nothing but a change of opinion on the part of the Assessing Officer. 5.6 Now, so far as the submission of Shri Mehta, learned advocate appearing o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version