Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Symbol Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.,

2015 (5) TMI 365 - ITAT BANGALORE

Transfer pricing adjustment - determination of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in respect of international transaction entered into by the Assessee with it’s Associated Enterprises (AE) - improper application of the Related Party Transaction (RPT) filter by the CIT(A) as submitted by AO - Held that:- In the cases of 24/7 Customer Pvt. Ltd. (2013 (1) TMI 45 - ITAT BANGALORE ), and Sony India Private Ltd. (2008 (9) TMI 420 - ITAT DELHI-H) and various other cases has taken a view that comparables having R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmal profits - Held that:- CIT(A) rejected some of the comparable companies chosen by the TPO by applying related party transaction filter. The filter of companies dealing in software products and abnormal profits owing to amalgamation of the companies during the relevant period thereby showing abnormal profits was applied to exclude Exensys Software solutions Ltd., was excluded for reasons of high turnover and high risk profile. Satyam Computer Services Ltd., has to be excluded from the compara .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

being more than zero percent, one comparable viz., Four Soft Ltd., will have to be excluded since the RPT is at 19.89% and thus in excess of 15%. Sathyam Computers Ltd., will get excluded for the reason that the financial results are not reliable. The remaining 10 comparable companies which were excluded by the CIT(A) by applying the Related Party Transaction filter of 0% related party transaction will now have to be included.

Foursoft Ltd., and Thirdware Solutions Ltd., should be ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

td.[being a big company in all respects including the range of turnover] be excluded from the list of comparable companies for the purpose of determining the ALP.

Geometric Software Solutions Ltd. - remand the question of excluding this company as a comparable to the TPO. If the RPT is more than 15% of the total revenues than this company should be excluded from the list of comparable companies.

Working capital adjustment - Held that:- no basis for the TPO to come to a con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regarding non utilization of the advances received for acquiring fixed capital. n our view the submissions made by the Assessee that the advance received from the AE should be considered while working out the working capital adjustment deserves to be accepted, if the Assessee demonstrates that such advances were not utilized for acquisition of fixed assets. If it is so demonstrated, these advances need to be included for working out the working capital of the Assessee while computing adjustment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

RNATAKA HIGH COURT) held that while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Act, if the export turnover in the numerator is to be arrived at after excluding certain expenditure, then the same expenditure should also be excluded from the total turnover also. Respectfully following the same, we dismiss this ground of revenue and of the view that the CIT(A) has rightly directed the AO to exclude telecommunication charges and travel expenses incurred be excluded both from export turnover an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re, relating to assessment year 2005-06. 2. The main issue that arises for consideration in the appeal by the Revenue and by the Assessee are relating to the addition made to the total income consequent to determination of Arm s Length Price (ALP) in respect of international transaction entered into by the Assessee with it s Associated Enterprises (AE) u/s.92 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The addition made consequent to determination of ALP by the TPO and addition on account of transfer pri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ravel expenses both from the total turnover and export turnover while computing deduction u/s.10A of the Act. The revenue has challenged the said action of the CIT(A) also. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A) in not applying certain filters while choosing comparable companies the Assessee has filed appeal before the Tribunal. 3. The assessee is a company incorporated on 12th May, 2000 under the Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of Symbol Technologies Inc. USA. The Asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as at arms length, the assessee filed a report as required by the provisions of section 92E of the Act in Form 3EB together with detailed analysis. The assessee adopted Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method for determining the ALP. Operating profits to cost was adopted as the Profit Level Indicator ( PLI ). The PLI of the assessee was arrived at as follows: Operating Revenue Rs.21,61,03,704 Operating Cost Rs.19,48,13,252 Operating Profit ₹ 2,12,90,452 Op.pr/co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arrived at arithmetic mean of 23.45% after working capital adjustment and 26.59% before working capital adjustment. The computation of the ALP by the TPO in this regard was as follows:- Computation of Arms Length Price: The arithmetic mean of the Profit Level indicators is taken as the arms length margin. (Please see Annexure B for details of computation of PLI of the comparables). Based on this, the arms length price of the software development services rendered by the taxpayer to its AE(s) is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5% of operating cost Rs.24,04,96,960 Price charged in the international transactions Rs.21,61,03,704 Shortfall being adjustment u/s.92CA ₹ 2,43,93,255 The above shortfall of ₹ 2,43,93,255/- is treated as transfer pricing adjustment u/s 92CA. 8. On appeal by the Assessee, the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the Assessee. The following were the key findings of the CIT(A):- (i) Out of the 17 companies chosen by the TPO as the final set of comparable companies, the CIT(A) excluded 12 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, viz., Bodhtree Consulting Ltd., Lanco Global System Ltd., Sankhya Infotech Ltd., Exensys Software Solution Ltd., and Visual Soft Technology Ltd. In coming to the above conclusion, the CIT(A) followed the decisions of this Hon ble Tribunal in the case of Mentor Graphics (Noida) (P.) Ltd. vs DCIT (2007] 109 lTD 101 (Del). (ii) One company, Exensys Software Solutions Ltd., was excluded because it was in multiple activities including software products, software services and for the reasons that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ability of financial data. In doing so, the CIT(A) followed the decision of this Hon ble Tribunal in Agnity India Technologies v. ITO (ITA 3856/DeI/2010) and SAP India Pvt. Ltd v. ITO [ITA No. 398/8/2008]. Likewise lnfosys Technologies selected by the TPO, was rejected as a comparable based on high turnover and high risk. In doing so, the CIT(A) followed the decision of this Hon ble Tribunal in Agnity India Technologies v. ITO and Genisys Integrated Systems (India) Pvt Ltd v. ITO (supra). The CI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

some comparable companies have not been accepted by the CIT(A). 11. The Revenue is in appeal on the following grounds:- (1) the decision of the Hon ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of TATA Elxsi 349 ITR 98 (Karn) wherein it was held that whatever is reduced from the export turnover should also be reduced from the total turnover, has been challenged by the Revenue in higher forums; (2) the learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the TPO erred in not excluding comparables have any related par .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Assessee in its grounds of appeal are:- (a) Arbitrarily rejecting filters applied by the Respondent while undertaking the TP Study. (b) Modifying filters applied by the learned TPO in the TP order, without providing an opportunity of being heard to the appellant. (c) Disregarding application of multiple year/prior year data for comparability. (d) Upholding the learned TPO s approach of using data available at the time of assessment proceedings. (e) Upholding the approach adopted by the learn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Related Party Transaction (RPT) filter by the CIT(A), it is not in dispute before us that this Tribunal, in the cases of 24/7 Customer Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No.227/Bang/2010), and Sony India Private Ltd. reported in (2009) 315 ITR (80) 150 (Del.) and various other cases has taken a view that comparables having RPT of upto 15% of total revenues can be considered. In view thereof, the Revenue s grievance on this issue as projected in the relevant ground has to be allowed. It is held that the CIT(A) oug .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT(A) rejected some of the comparable companies chosen by the TPO by applying related party transaction filter. The filter of companies dealing in software products and abnormal profits owing to amalgamation of the companies during the relevant period thereby showing abnormal profits was applied to exclude Exensys Software solutions Ltd., was excluded for reasons of high turnover and high risk profile. Satyam Computer Services Ltd., has to be excluded from the comparable companies for non-reliab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ompanies. 15. As regards the standard deduction of 5% of the arm s length price allowed to the Appellant by the CIT(A), which is challenged in ground No.5 by the Revenue before the Tribunal, it is not in dispute before us that in view of the substitution of the Second proviso to Section 92C(2) of the Income-tax Act by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, the second ground of appeal (Ground No.3 in the appeal filed by the Revenue) may have to be allowed. Consequently it is held that if the difference be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filter will have to be included along with the four comparable retained by the CIT(A). Although 12 comparable which were rejected on the basis of RPT being more than zero percent, one comparable viz., Four Soft Ltd., will have to be excluded since the RPT is at 19.89% and thus in excess of 15%. Sathyam Computers Ltd., will get excluded for the reason that the financial results are not reliable. The remaining 10 comparable companies which were excluded by the CIT(A) by applying the Related Party .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re products & services and training. The company focuses on the development of niche products for the transport and aviation industry. However, segmental information in relation to the above mentioned activities is not available in public domain. Therefore, as Sankhya engages itself in products and services as well as software training, it cannot be considered as a comparable of the Appellant. The products developed and owned by Sankhya are listed below:- (1) SILICONTM Training Suite of Prod .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Sakai CLE : This is a widely used and popular open source LMS used in many leading educational institutions and corporate. The relevant extract from the Annual report substantiating that the company also engages in different activities is reproduced below: 2. Activities The company as engaged in the business of development of Software Products & Services and training. The production of software is not capable of being expressed in any generic unit and hence 11 is riot possible to give the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

activities set out above and the decision of the Delhi ITAT rendered in the context of a software development company such as the Assessee makes it amply clear that this company Sankhya cannot be regarded as a comparable. The same is directed to be excluded from the list of comparable companies. 21. The learned counsel for the Assessee submitted before us that two of the comparable companies out of the 12 excluded by the CIT(A) by applying RPT filter and which gets included in the comparable com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e case of CNO IT Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Conseco Data Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.) Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Circle 1(2) Hyderabad, in ITA.No.1280/Hyd/2010 Assessment Year 2005-2006 order dated 12.2.2014. 22. We have considered his submission and find that the ITAT Hyderabad Bench on identical facts, held that the aforesaid two companies viz., Four Soft Ltd., and Thirdware Solutions Ltd., are not comparable companies in Software Development Services companies. The following were : .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpany is objected to by the assessee on the reason that the said Thirdware Software Solutions Ltd. is engaged in sale of software licence and related services and not a service provider. Referring to the annual report, it was submitted that this comparable was rejected by the ITAT, Pune in the case of Egain Communications Ltd. This company having revenue from product license and earning extraordinary profit due to intangible owns. 15.6. These three comparable above Flextronics Software Limited, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th software as well as product development. He submitted that the TPO has taken note of the fact these companies are also into product development but has selected these companies as comparables by applying the filter of more than 70% of its revenue being from software development services. The learned Counsel submitted that the functions of these companies are different from the assessee who was into sole activity of software development for its associated enterprise. He submitted that the TPO .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

em as comparable companies and before taking the operating margin for arriving at the arms length price. He submitted that wherever the segmental details are not available, then the said companies should not be taken as comparables. For this purpose, he placed reliance upon the decision of the Bangalore Tribunal in the case of First Advantage Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. The DCIT in ITA.No.1252/Bang/2010 wherein these companies were directed to be excluded from the list of comparables. 24. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the Assessing Officer ought not to have taken the companies which are into both the product development as well as software development service provider as comparables unless the segmental details are available. Even if he has adopted the filter of more than 75% of the revenue from the software services for selecting a comparable company, he ought to have taken the segmental results of the software services only. The percentage of expenditure towards the development of software products may di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from software licence also and AMCs. 26. As far as Thirdware Software Solution Limited is concerned, we find from the information furnished by the said company that though the said company is also into product development, there are no software products that the company invoiced during the relevant financial year and the financial results are in respect of services only. Thus, it is clear that there is no sale of software products during the year but the said company might have incurred expendi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the TPO himself, these companies cannot be taken as comparable companies. The method adopted by the TPO to allocate expenditure proportionately to the software development services and software product activity cannot be said to be correct and reasonable. Wherever, the Assessing Officer/TPO cannot make suitable adjustment to the financial results of the comparable companies with the assessee company to bring them on par with the assessee, these companies are to be excluded from the list of c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The learned counsel for the Assessee submitted before us that TATA Elxsi Ltd., a comparable company out of the 12 excluded by the CIT(A) by applying RPT filter and which gets included in the comparable companies because of 15% RPT being adopted as threshold limit for excluding companies for the purpose of comparability. It was his submission that this company will however, have to be excluded as this company was held to be not comparable with an Assessee such as the Assessee in the present case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is that TATA Elxsi operating two segments -system communication services and software development services. The TPO accepted the software development services segment in his T.P. analysis and assessee s objection is that the software development services segment itself comprises of three subservices namely (a) product design services (b)design engineering services and (c) visual computing labs. It was submitted that these services are not akin to assessee software services and segmental informat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee, filed before us the reply of Tata Elxsi Limited to the Addl. CIT (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad, wherein the concerned Officer has been informed that Tata Elxsi Limited is specialised Embedded Software Development Service Provider and that it cannot be compared with any other software development company. It was submitted that because of the specialisation and also because of diverse nature of its business, it is very difficult to scale-up the operations of Tata Elxsi Limited. In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her assessee. In the result, the Assessing Officer/TPO is directed to reconsider the issue in accordance with law, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Keeping the assessee s objections and the decisions of the Coordinate Bench, prima facie, we are of the view that TATA Elxsi Limited is functionally different and has incomparable size to that of the assessee. Further, we are unable to verify whether the segmental profits adopted by the TPO pertain to entire so .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ard to assessee. 26. Though the issue has been set aside to the AO in the aforesaid decision, the ITAT Hyderabad in the case of NTT Data India Enterprise Application Services Pvt.Ltd., ITA No.1612/Hyd/2010 order dated 23.10.2013 and in a subsequent ruling in the case of Invensys Development Centre (India) Pvt.Ltd., ITA No.1256/Hyd/2010 order dated 28.2.2014, held that TATA Elxsi is not functionally comparable with that of a software development service provider such as the Assessee. 27. In view .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

owns brands, intangibles and has huge scale of operations etc., In this regard, the learned counsel for the Assessee relied on the following observations of the Hyderabad ITAT Bench in the case of IVY Computech P.Ltd. Vs. ACIT ITA No.1558/hyd/2010 for AY 05-06:- (f) Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.: The learned AR objecting to the aforesaid company being treated as a comparable submitted that the related party transaction of the aforesaid company being more than 25% of its revenue i.e., precisely 34%, i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

company is, its related party transaction as a percentage to the total revenue is 34% which is more than the accept/reject matrix of more than 25% fixed by the TPO. It is to be noted that in final filters adopted by the TPO in para 8.7 of his order he himself has excluded companies having RPT of more than 25%. We, therefore, direct the AO to examine this aspect and exclude it from the list of comparables if the assessee's contention is found to be correct. In course of hearing the learned D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7; 6,859 crores compared to the total turnover of about ₹ 66 crores of the assessee from both the segments and it was contended by the learned AR that under no circumstances Infosys Technologies Ltd. and WIPRO can be treated as comparable to the assessee as it is a giant in the sector of software development and ITES having considerable brand value. The learned DR, on the other hand, while strongly opposing contention of the assessee, submitted that the assessee itself in its own TP Study .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n, the learned AR relied upon the decision of the ITAT Special Bench in the case of Quark Systems (38 SOT 207). We have heard submissions of the parties and perused the materials on record. So far as Infosys Technologies Ltd. is concerned the issue of comparability of the aforesaid company has been considered by different Benches of the Tribunal including the Hyderabad Benches. It is to be noted that the consistent view of different Benches of the Tribunal is to the effect that Infosys Technolog .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. However, as held by ITAT Special Bench in the case of Quark Systems Ltd. (supra) merely because the assessee had selected it as a comparable it cannot operate as an estoppel in raising objections with regard to comparability of the aforesaid company. Therefore, keeping in tune with the consistent view of different Benches of the Tribunal in respect of the aforesaid company, we direct the AO/TPO to exclude the aforesaid company from the list of comparables. 29. Respectfully following the afores .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

TP)A.No.1274/Bang/2010 for AY 06-07. It is seen that the aforesaid decision relates to AY 06-07 and we do not know the details of the RPT in AY 05-06. We therefore deem it fit and proper to remand the question of excluding this company as a comparable to the TPO. If the RPT is more than 15% of the total revenues than this company should be excluded from the list of comparable companies. We hold and direct accordingly. 31. According to the learned counsel for the Assessee, if the submissions of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

DJUSTMENT : [Ground 2 (g)] 32. The Assessee has pointed out that while working out the adjustment to be made to the profit margins on account of working capital adjustment, the TPO did not take into account the advance received by the Assessee from its Associated Enterprise on the ground that these advances were utilized for acquiring fixed assets. The Assessee pointed out before DRP that the advances were provided to the Assessee by the AE to meet its current working capital as well as the futu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not out of the advances given by the AE. The TPO as well as the DRP did not consider this claim by examining the details furnished by the Assessee but held that the advances received from the AE were utilized for acquiring fixed assets. 33. Before us, the learned counsel for the Assessee reiterated submissions made before DRP. The learned counsel therefore prayed for inclusion of advances received from AE while computing working capital for arriving at the adjustment to be made to the margins of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

basis, the TPO has proceeded to ignore the advances received from AE while computing working capital adjustment. In our view such an approach cannot be sustained. Besides the above, the DRP has ignored the submissions made by the Assessee regarding non utilization of the advances received for acquiring fixed capital. Before us the Assessee did not demonstrate regarding the utilization of advances from the AE. In our view the submissions made by the Assessee that the advance received from the AE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

advances not having been utilized for acquiring fixed assets. The AO/TPO will afford opportunity of being heard to the Assessee and decide the issue in accordance with law. 35. The AO/TPO is accordingly directed to work out the profit margins and working capital adjustment in the light of the directions given above. 36. The Revenue in the grounds of appeal before the Tribunal (Ground No.2 & 3) has also projected its grievance regarding the action of the learned Dispute Resolution Panel in d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version