GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 394 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2015 (5) TMI 394 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Demand notices u/s 156 - requirement of deposit during the pendency of appeal - whether the petitioner-assessee shall be treated as assessee in default and appropriate action of recovery shall be taken? - petitioner-assessee had already deposited 50% of the amount - Held that:- The issues are already concluded in favour of the petitioner-assessee by the decision of this Court in the case of GSPC Gas Company Ltd. (2013 (11) TMI 1542 - GUJRAT HIGH COUR .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee in default. The learned CIT(A) to decide and dispose of the respective appeals in accordance with law and on its own merits without, in any way, being influenced by the present order expeditiously. - Decided in favour of assessee. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5003 of 2015, 5004 of 2015, 5008 of 2015 - Dated:- 28-4-2015 - MR. M.R. SHAH AND MR. S.H.VORA, JJ FOR THE PETITIONER : MR SN SOPARKAR, SR. ADVOCATE with MR B S SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs dated 13/03/2015 by which during pendency of the respective appeals before the learned CIT(A) against the Assessment Orders for the Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2012-13, the proposal of the petitioner not to treat the petitioner-assessee as assessee in default on payment of 25% of the outstanding consolidated demand for all the three Assessment Years has been rejected and consequently treating the petitioner as assessee in default and threatening the action of recovery. [3.0] At the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atuity Premium 1,26,00,819 Total Additions 4,24,99,693 21,81,17,052 7,51,87,000 Demand 2,46,87,609 11,84,29,186 3,30,09,740 [3.1] Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid assessment orders, more particularly, the additions as above, the petitioner preferred appeals before the learned CIT(A), which are pending before the learned CIT(A). In the meantime, the petitioner-assessee was served with the notices / demand notices under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act dated 28/01/2015 and, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

15 days, which was proposed by the petitioner-assessee had expired and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has rejected the said proposal and has observed that on payment of the entire amount of demand raised pursuant to the assessment orders, the petitioner-assessee shall be treated as assessee in default and appropriate action of recovery shall be taken. At that stage and feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid communication dated 13/03/2015, the petitioner-assessee has preferred t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essing Officer are not sustainable at law at all. It is further submitted that the petitioner-assessee made a proposal before the Assessing Officer and proposed to deposit 25% of the consolidated amount with respect to the aforesaid three Assessment Years within a period of 15 days and on deposit of the said amount, the petitioner may not be treated as assessee in default. However, despite the fact that the personal hearing was given by the Assessing Officer, the impugned communication has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as assessee in default during pendency and final disposal of the appeals before the learned CIT(A). [4.1] Shri Soparkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-assessee has heavily relied upon the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of GSPC Gas Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax rendered in Special Civil Application No.14746/2013 and allied Special Civil Applications in support of his above prayer. [5.0] Shri Sudhir Mehta, learned advocate appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version