Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Paladiya Brothers And Co. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-9

2015 (5) TMI 433 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - initiation of the reassessment proceedings beyond the period of 4 years -additional depreciation claim - Held that:- Applying the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Niko Resources Ltd. (2014 (9) TMI 892 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ) as well as Gujarat Lease Financing Limited (2013 (10) TMI 101 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ), to the facts of the case on hand and as observed hereinabove, there does not appear to be failure on the part of the assessee to disclose .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e impugned reassessment proceedings of reopening assessment for the A.Y. 2007-2008 are hereby terminated on the aforesaid ground alone. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Special Civil Application No. 16680 of 2014 - Dated:- 8-4-2015 - M. R. Shah And S. H. Vora, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr Hardik V Vora, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir M Mehta, Adv. JUDGMENT (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Shah) 1.00. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eturn of income for A.Y. 2007-2008 declaring total income at ₹ 87,66,926/-. That the petitioner assessee Company stated source of income from business of cutting and polishing of diamond. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment by issuing notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. That after making detailed inquiry, the Assessing Officer assessed the income at ₹ 84,80,421/- after accepting the rectification application of the assessee for claim of deduction of responden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated 27/6/2014 objecting to reassessment proceedings. 2.05. That by order / communication dated 25/9/2014, the assessing officer overlooked the objections raised by the petitioner against the impugned reassessment proceedings and hence the petitioner has preferred the present Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned reassessment proceedings which are initiated beyond the period of 4 years of the relevant assessment year. 3.00. Mr.Hardik Vo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner - assessee has further submitted that in the present case, as such there is/ was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully material facts necessary for assessment. It is submitted that all details were duly provided as and when sought and/or required to the Assessing Officer and the same was scrutinized by the Assessing Officer. It is submitted that therefore, now having allowed the claim, it is not open to the respondent - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee and therefore, the claim of the additional depreciation, contrary to the provisions of the Act had resulted into escapement of income to the extent of ₹ 14,77,669/-. It is submitted that on the aforesaid ground, reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated beyond the period of 4 years. It is submitted that when the Assessing Officer passed the assessment order and allowed the claim of additional depreciation claimed by the assessee, it cannot be said that there was any failure on th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee has heavily relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Niko Resources Ltd. Versus Assistant Director of Income Tax, reported in (2014) 51 Taxman.com 568 (Gujarat) in support of his request to quash and set aside the impugned reassessment proceedings. 3.04. Mr.Hardik Vora, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner - assessee has also heavily relied upon the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the Case of Gujarat Lease Financing Limited Versus Deputy Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t was found that the assessee claimed additional depreciation incorrectly, though the additional depreciation was not allowable, as in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Gem India Manufacturing Co., reported in (2001) 249 ITR 307 (SC) , cutting and polishing of diamond cannot be considered as business of manufacture or production and therefore, the assessee wrongly claimed additional depreciation of ₹ 14,77,669/- and there .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he present petition is filed at premature stage, unless and until a notice under section 148 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act has been issued. It is submitted that in the event the petitioner assessee is aggrieved by the reassessment order, alternative efficacious remedy is available by way of an appeal to the CIT(A) and thereafter to the learned tribunal as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, it is requested not to entertain the present petition. 4.03. On merits, Mr.Sudhir Meht .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

noted that what is challenged in the present Special Civil Application by the petitioner - assessee is the reopening of the assessment for the A.Y. 2007-2008 and initiation of the reassessment proceedings for the A.Y. 2007-2008, in exercise of the powers under section 147 read with section 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is required to be noted that in the present case initiation of reassessment proceedings is beyond 4 years from the assessment year. Therefore, unless and until it is observed and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

return under section 139 or in response to the notice under section 142(1) or under section 148 and he failed to disclose truly and fully all material facts necessary for the assessment. Once the case of the assessee is covered by the first proviso to section 147, reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year would be without jurisdiction and bad in law. If all material facts are furnished by the assessee and there remains no omission or fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act for A.Y. 2007-08 are initiated beyond the period of four years. The reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment for A.Y. 2007-2008, which are communicated to the petitioner assessee vide communication dated 6/6/2014 are as follows:- "Reasons recorded under section 148(2) of the Income Tax Act: Section 32(1) provides that in the case of new machinery of plant (other ships and aircraft acquired and installed after 31-3-2005, by an assessee engaged in the business of manufactur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

udes depreciation at 15% / 7.5% and additional depreciation at 20% / 10%. The assessee was engaged in the manufacturing of diamond cutting and polishing. The cutting and polishing of diamond cannot be considered as a business of manufacturing of production as held by Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Gem India Mftg. Co. (2001) 249 ITR 307 (the Hon'ble Supreme Court). Accordingly additional depreciation was not allowable but the additional depreciation was incorrectly claimed by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e claim of additional depreciation contrary to the provisions of the Act had resulted into the escapement of income to extent of (Rs. 14,77,669/-) due to the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly all material facts necessary for his assessment." Thus, from the aforesaid, it appears that the assessment for A.Y. 2007-2008 is sought to be reopened on the ground that in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Gem Ind .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

return of income, the assessee claimed depreciation at 20% / 10% in respect of Lesser Machine, Leth, Ghanti and Plant & Machinery which came to be considered and granted by the A.O. Therefore, as such it cannot be said that there was any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully all material facts necessary for the assessment with respect to the additional depreciation claimed. 5.04. The reasons for reopening of the assessment as mentioned in the communication dated 6/6 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on claimed. Under the circumstances, the condition precedent for invoking powers under section 147 of the Income Tax Act to initiate reassessment proceedings beyond the period of 4 years are not at all satisfied. 5.06. Identical question came to be considered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Niko Resources Ltd. (supra) and while considering the scope and ambit of powers to be exercised under section 147 of the Income Tax Act by the Assessing Officer, while reopening the assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion I47 of the Act after expiry of 4 years only if (1) the assessee failed to make a return under section I39 of the Act or in response to notice issued under section 142(1) or under section 148 of the Act, he failed to disclose truly and fully all material facts necessary for the assessment. Once all primary facts are before the assessing authority, no further assistance is required by way of disclosure. All inferences of facts and legal inference need to be drawn by the Assessing Officer. It i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

close truly and fully all material facts. This Court, after extensively discussing law on the issue in case of Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. (supra), has held thus: "10. It can be clearly noted from the reasons recorded that there is no mention at all of the assessee having not disclosed fully or truly material facts which were necessary for the purpose of computing the income of the assessee. Assuming that in the notice for reopening. such wordings are not specifically mentioned and they ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

escaped assessment for any assessment year, can assess or reassess such income and also any such other income chargeable to tax, which has escaped the assessment. However, no such action is permissible after lapse of 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment on account of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of such assessment. The onus is on the assessee to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version