Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Jupiter Corporation Services Limited & Sulochana V Gupta Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

2015 (5) TMI 510 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) confirmed penalty levy - whether the Tribunal while complying with the provisions of section 255(4) of the Act can consider the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ABG Heavy Industries [2010 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]? - grievance with the majority view - Held that:- In the light of the clear directions given by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the appeals filed by the assessee for the impugned assessment years inter alia directed the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X



In case anyone has grievances with the majority view, the aggrieved party can seek appropriate remedy against the same. That situation will come only when the majority view is implemented and a formal order is passed on the appeal. However, just because one of the parties before us has a grievance with the majority view, notwithstanding the merits of such grievance, even if any, we must not delay the judicial process of giving effect to the majority view. The majority view in these app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pellant : Tushar P Hemani, For the Respondent : Subhash Bains, ORDER Per Pramod Kumar AM: 1. When these appeals were originally heard by the Tribunal, there was a difference between the Judicial Member and the Accountant Member then constituting this division bench. To come out of this cul-de-sac, the following question was referred for the esteemed opinion of a Third Member, to be nominated by Hon ble President of this Tribunal, under section 255(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Whether, under t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question ……… is that under the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) was justified in confirming the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act…. 3. The opinion so expressed by the Hon ble Third Member as also the respective separate orders passed by then Judicial Member and the then Accountant Member constituting this division bench are now placed before us for giving effect to the majority opinion. 4. Shri Tushar P Hemani, learned counsel for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or members since the learned Third Member, in his opinion, has disregarded the division bench orders. Our attention is invited to a recent judgment of the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court, in the case of CIT Vs Vallabhdas Vithaldas [(2015) 56 taxmann.com 300 (Guj)] wherein it is held that the decisions of the division benches must bind the single member benches. Learned counsel then points out that a third member decision cannot be equated with a special bench decision of three members, which m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the Third Member is nothing more than an opinion but our giving effect to such an opinion will result into an order of the Tribunal coming into existence but then this order will be directly contrary to the decision of Hon ble jurisdictional High Court. Our attention is also invited to the judicial precedents in the cases of Sayaji Iron & Engg Co Ltd Vs CIT [(2002) 253 ITR 749 (Guj)], Union of India Vs Paras Laminates Pvt Ltd [(1990) 186 ITR 722(SC)], Pradip Chndar Parija Vs Pramod Chandra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

decision of the Hon ble high Court that it has not taken into account an earlier decision on the same issue. We are thus urged to desist from such an exercise and from passing an order which is wholly unsustainable in law and in complete disregard to binding judicial precedents. It is learned counsel s prayer that the matter should be referred to Hon ble President for constitution of a special bench to resolve this issue. 5. Shri Subhash Bains, learned Commissioner (DR), vehemently opposes these .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

once and that, even almost one year after the Third Member opinion is expressed, the disposal of these appeals is being avoided due to dilatory tactics employed by the assessee. It is not the case that the decisions of the coordinate benches have not been followed without any reasons, according to the learned Commissioner (DR), but the learned Third Member, in a very erudite and detailed order, has given specific reasons as to why these decisions donot hold good in the present case. Learned Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o out of three Members have already given their views in favour of the stand of the Assessing Officer and all that we are required to do at this stage is to give effect to the majority views. 6. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the material on record and duly considered facts of the case in the light of the applicable legal position. 7. As Shri Hemani rightly points out, the legal position as it exists now, post Vallabhdas Vithaldas decision (supra) by Hon ble jurisdictional High Cou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

heavily relies on the collective decision making process where multiple legal minds are simultaneously applied assisted by legal research and presentation of legal arguments. When such materials and legal contentions are processed by several judges, the decision that is rendered even if not unanimous has the advantage of input from larger number of legally trained minds. In the present case, unlike a case of larger Bench where three or more judges would be simultaneously hearing a question of l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the later Division Benches on the point which arises directly in the present reference 8. Viewed thus, a larger bench decision binds the bench of a lesser strength because of the plurality in the decision making process and because of the collective application of mind. In simple words, as held by Their Lordships, what three minds do together, even when the result is not unanimous, is treated as intellectually superior to what two minds do together, and, by the same logic, what two minds do .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iew is not possible as a result of a single member bench, such as in a situation in which one of the dissenting members has not stated his views on an aspect which is crucial and on which the other member has expressed his views, it is possible to constitute third member benches of more than one members. That precisely could be the reason as to why even while nominating the Third Member under section 255(4), Hon ble President of this Tribunal has the power of referring the case for hearing on su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, in the case of P C Puri Vs CIT [(1985) 151 ITR 584 (Del)], expressed a contrary view on this issue which held the field till we had the benefit of guidance from Hon ble jurisdictional High Court. The approach adopted by the learned Third Member was quite in consonance with the legal position so prevailing at that point of time. For the sake of completeness of discussion, we set out the views so taken by Hon ble Delhi High Court and leave it at that:- There is no difference, really speaking, be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e. Whether the three judges sit at the same time or at different times-two at one time, and the third hearing the matter later on a difference of opinion-does not make much difference. As has happened in this case, the two judges have differed. So the case has come to me, the third judge. The two judges have expressed their opinion. I am now called upon to give my opinion. The opinion of the majority will prevail. All that happens is that the third is segregated from the two and does not sit wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atter has to be referred to a third judge. (see sec. 98, CPC). In my opinion, the reference was correctly made to me as the third judge. 9. However, before we address ourselves to the correctness of fundamental factual assumption underlying the contentions advanced by the learned counsel, that the decision of the learned Third Member is unsustainable in law inasmuch as it is contrary to the decisions of the division benches directly on the issue before the learned Third Member, we still have to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ltd Vs ACIT (ITA Nos, 1408 and 1409/PN/2003; order dated 28th February 2013), a coordinate bench of this Tribunal was in seisin of a situation in which by the time the division bench was called upon to give effect to the three member third member bench decision {reported as B T Patil & Sons Belgaum Constructions Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT [1 ITR (Tribunal) 703]}, the division bench also had the benefit of guidance from Hon ble jurisdictional High Court on that issue, and the assessee did obtain a dire .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the said assessee u/s. 80IA(4) of the Act. The said jurisdictional order is contrary to the opinion given by the Third Member of the Tribunal. Meanwhile the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Tribunal dismissing the appeals of the assessee in limine, before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court came up for hearing on 24/01/2013. In the course of hearing before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court the Counsel of the assessee brought to the notice of the Hon'ble High Court the fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Member as per the provisions of section 255(4) of the Act. 5. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court permitted the Counsel of the assessee to withdraw the said appeals. While passing the order the Hon'ble High Court has kept all the contentions open and further directed the Tribunal to consider the decision of the ABG Heavy Industries and other decisions while passing their order giving effect to the opinion of the Third Member as per the provisions of section 255(4) of the Act. The relevant por .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e kept open. 3. The appeal is dismissed of in above terms. 6. The issue before us is whether the Tribunal while complying with the provisions of section 255(4) of the Act can consider the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of ABG Heavy Industries. In light of the clear directions given by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the appeals filed by the assessee for the impugned assessment years inter alia directed the Tribunal to consider the said decision of ABG Heavy Industries an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by the Hon ble High Court to take into account the subsequent judicial developments by way of adjudication on the issue in appeal by Hon ble Courts above. The division bench has, taking note of these directions and indicating their limitations in the light of these directions, have specifically observed that the Tribunal is bound to follow the directions and we do so accordingly . If the division bench had the powers to take note of the subsequent judicial developments, post the expression of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

No other judicial precedent, supporting the stand of the assessee, has been brought to our notice. In view of these discussions, and as Shri Bains rights contends, at the time of giving effect to the majority view, it cannot normally be open to the Tribunal to go beyond the exercise of giving effect to the majority views, howsoever mechanical it may seem. In the case of dissenting situations on the division bench, the process of judicial adjudication is complete when the third member, nominated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version