Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Quadrant Televentrures Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Chandigarh-I

Rectification of mistake - Imposition of penalty - Calculation of period of limitation - Held that:- If there is a mistake apparent on record the application for rectification of mistake can be filed within 2 years of the date of which such order was passed. Admittedly in this case the appellant has filed the application on Rectification of Mistake within two years of the order of adjudication - On going through the calculation shown in the calculation sheet for imposition of penalty I find that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pellant - matter remanded back - Rectification done. - Appeal No. ST/55647 & 55855/2014-ST(SM) - Dated:- 24-3-2015 - Ashok Jindal, Member (J),J. For the Appellant : Shri Rupinder Singh, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Ranjana Jha, DR ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellants are in appeal against the impugned orders. As both the appeals are interconnected therefore both are taken up together. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant did not pay Service Tax in time during the period October 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal. Therefore, appeal was dismissed. Against the said order appellant is before me. 3. After receipt of the adjudication order the appellant did not file the appeal but on 18.06.2013 the appellant filed an application for rectification of mistake which was apparent on record. Under section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 the application for rectification of mistake in the order dated 14.07.2011 was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority on 21.06.2013. Against the said order appellant also filed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ore, the adjudication order was under consideration by the Adjudicating Authority and has not attained for finality. In these circumstances, order of dismissal of the appeal by the Ld. Commissioner (A) on the ground that appeal has been filed beyond a period of limitation is not sustainable. To support his contention he relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Shree Lotus Exports Vs. CCE Trichy-2011 (24) STR 444 (Tri-Chennai). For the appeal against the dismissal of their appeal on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

these circumstances, he submits that matter be remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration of the claim. 5. On the other hand Ld. AR strongly opposes the contention of the Ld. Counsel and submits the appellant were given nine opportunities to present their case. Neither they filed reply to the show cause notice nor they appeared before the Adjudicating Authority and it was in the knowledge of the appellant itself by way of issuance of the show cause notice that number of days .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of the appellant, therefore, at this stage appellant is not entitled for any benefit of section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994. 6. Heard the parties. Considered the submission. 7. I have gone through provision of section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 which is reproduced here for the ease of convenience as under: "74. Rectification of mistake.- (1) With a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, the [Central Excise Officer] who passed any order under the provisions of this Chapt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Subject to the other provisions of this section, the [Central Excise Officer] concerned (a) may make an amendment under sub-section (1) of his own motion; or (b) shall make such amendment if any mistake is brought to his notice by the assessee or the [Commissioner] of Central Excise or the [Commissioner] of Central Excise (Appeals). (4) An amendment, which has the effect of enhancing [the liability of the assessee or reducing a refund], shall not be made under this section unless the [Central Ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch may be due to such assessee. (7) Where any such amendment has the effect of enhancing the [liability of the assessee] or reducing the refund already made, the [Central Excise Officer] shall make an order specifying the sum payable by the assessee and the provisions of this Chapter shall apply accordingly." 8. From the perusal of the provisions I find that if there is a mistake apparent on record the application for rectification of mistake can be filed within 2 years of the date of which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id by the appellant on 28.09.2006. Therefore, the number of days for period paid were 54 days whereas it is shown as 115 days. Therefore, there is a mistake apparent on record for which impugned order is required to be reconsidered for calculation purpose whether the penalty has been imposed by calculating 54 days or 115 days for appellant and thereafter to arrive at the correct amount of penalty imposable on the appellant. Further, I find that argument advanced by the Ld. AR that there are latc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version