GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 635 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (5) TMI 635 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Receipt of commission for disbursement of govt. teacher's salary - Business Auxiliary Services - Penalty u/s 78 - Held that:- lower authorities were error in holding that appellant would fall under the category of commission agent and the amount received by them from the Government of Maharashtra through Zilha Parishad as service charges for disbursement of salaries of Govt. teachers cannot be considered as commission received though it may be entered in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/40/10 - Dated:- 16-4-2015 - M V Ravindran, Member (J) And P S Pruthi, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Vidhyadhar Apte, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri R K Das, Deputy Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: M V Ravindran: This appeal is directed against No. P-III/VM/216/2009 dated 12.10.2009. 2. The issue involved in this case is that appellant is engaged in providing services under the category of Banking and other Financial Services. During scrutiny of the records by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lties. Adjudicating authority after following due process of law confirmed the demand with interest and imposed penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The first appellate authority did not agree with the contentions raised by the appellant in their appeal before him and upheld the order. 3. Heard both sides and perused all the records. 4. It is the case of the appellant that the amount received by them would not fall under the definition of commission by any stretch of imagination .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g that appellant would fall under the category of commission agent and the amount received by them from the Government of Maharashtra through Zilha Parishad as service charges for disbursement of salaries of Govt. teachers cannot be considered as commission received though it may be entered in the records of the appellant as commission received. In order to appreciate the correct legal position, it is required to look into the definition of commission agent as per Financial year 2005 which is as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version