TMI BlogMeeting to review the progress in implementation of N.R. Parmar judgment of the Supreme Court and the decisions taken-reg.X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he status of implementation of the Supreme Court judgment in N.R Parmar and the guidelines issued by CBDT in the form of FAQs, meetings chaired by DGIT (HRD) were held on 30.3.2015 and 10-04-2015, with representatives of all CCAs and ITEF. The representatives from Bihar Jharkhand and Kerala and ITGOA were not present in the meetings. The highlights of the meeting are as below. 2. The DGIT (HRD) impressed upon the participants that the implementation task was important for finalizing the All India Seniority list of ITOs which in turn was essential for promotion from ITO to ACIT grade. 3, DGIT (HRD) sought inputs from the participants about the process being followed by them for implementation of N.R. Parmar judgment. The represent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ex court decision in N.R Parmar is applicable only for the direct recruits selected through the open examination, Sports Compassionate quota appointments are to be dealt with as per separate instructions. 7. For UP (West) region, the representatives informed that they were not able to trace the records from 1986 to 1991 i.e. for the period, the requisition was made directly by CCIT office to the Staff Selection Commission. DGIT (HRD) advised UP (West) region to obtain the dates of requisition made by them to SSC, by looking into the dossiers of the selected candidates of those years, as the dossiers would contain details of the requisition letters. SSC regional offices or even neighboring regions may be consulted to get a clue. 8. M ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sentatives to cooperate with the local administration to expedite the process. President, ITEF agreed to do so. 12. Following decisions were taken in the meeting: I) Bottom-to-top approach would be followed by all the regions in implementing the decision, which entails re-fixing the seniority list followed by review DPCs starting from the lowest grade and progressing upwards rather than undertaking the fixation of seniority list of Inspectors and ITOs first and then progressing downwards, since the latter method would involve a review of the review DPCs, which would add to the confusion and would extend the period of implementation. II) All the regions to finish the task of implementation of the N.R Parmar Judgement by 31-07.2015 a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
