Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 653 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

2015 (5) TMI 653 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT - TMI - Eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(4) - Whether the conversion of gram Dal into Besan powder, by a process of mere roasting and grinding, amounts to manufacture? - Held that:- Applying test given in Idandas versus Anant Ram Chandra Phadke (dead) by L.Rs., [1981 (11) TMI 185 - SUPREME COURT] it can conveniently be held that converting gram Dal into Besan will amount to manufacturing process because:i) gram Dal loses its shape and id .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t conversion of gram Dal into Besan amounts to manufacture and consequently the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(4) of the Income Tax Act. - Decided in favour of assesse. - Decided in favour of the assessee

Eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB (4) - whether necessarily to be computed after allowing depreciation under Section 32? - Held that:- Profits eligible for deduction under Section 80IB (4) of the Act though are necessarily to be computed after al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y 73 days during the entire year? - Held that:- Once, it is established that the assessee had not employed 10 or more workers during the substantial part of the year, we are left with no other option but to answer the question in favour of the revenue - Decided against the assessee. - ITA No. 43 of 2009, ITAs No. 44, 45, 46, 49 , 51 of 2009 - Dated:- 23-4-2015 - Mansoor Ahmad Mir, CJ And Tarlok Singh Chauhan, JJ. For the Appellants : Mr Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Adv. & Ms Vandana Kuthiala, Adv. Fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 80IB (4) of the Income Tax Act are necessarily to be computed after allowing depreciation under Section 32? Whereas, the following question of law is common in ITA No.49 and 51 of 2009:- ITA No.49 of 2009. "3. Whether the condition of ten or more workers to be employed in the manufacturing process, as specified in section 80IB(2)(iv) could be said to be complied with, especially when ten or more workers were actually engaged on only 73 days during the entire year." Though the sam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i and instant daliya. It commenced commercial production on 19.03.1999 as per the certificate granted by the Department of Industries. 3. For the assessment year 2000-01 to 2004-05, the assessee filed returns of income claiming the entire profits as deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (for short the 'Act'). For the assessment year 2003-04, the assessee filed return of income declaring total income at nil after claiming deduction under Section 80IB at ₹ 33.11 l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Assessment for the assessment year 2003-04 in this case was completed under Section 143(3) on 30.03.2006. In all these five assessments the claim of deduction under Section 80IB was disallowed on various grounds including the ground that the process of making daliya and besan did not amount to manufacture. 4. The Assessing Officer also held in the assessment that though the assessee had not claimed depreciation in assessment year 2000-01 and 2001-02, the same should be allowed while computing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed appeal before the ITAT, who allowed the same by holding that all the necessary conditions for grant of deduction under Section 80IB were satisfied. On the issue of manufacturing, the ITAT relied its own decision in the case of Indus Cosmeceuticals which related to manufacture of herbal heena powder from heena leaves and was held to be a manufacturing activity. This decision in turn has already been upheld by this Court in a bunch of appeals, the lead case being ITA No.28 of 2009, titled a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, therefore, is not entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB. 8. In support of his contention, he has relied upon judgment of Madras High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Sacs Eagles Chicory [2000] 241 I.T.R. 319 as affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment reported in [2002] 255 I.T.R. 178 titled Sacs Eagles Chicory vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and a judgment of this Court in ITA No. 27 of 2005 titled Mrs. Poonam Arora vs. Income Tax Officer and others, decided on 14. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be considered reads thus (see [2000] 241 ITR 319, 320): Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee- firm is an industrial undertaking eligible for deduction under Sections 80HH, 80-I and 80-J of the Income Tax Act, 1961? " All that is on record in regard to the "process" that the assessee carries on is stated in the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax thus: "But if an analysis of the activity of making powder from the chic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

supra) is concerned, this Court had categorically come to the conclusion that mere process of roasting of raw groundnut seeds into groundnut did not amount to manufacture as no new and distinct product came into existence. 11. Now, in case the facts of the present case are seen, the ITAT after considering its own observations in the case of M/s Indus Cosmeceuticals held the activity of converting Besan from gram Dal amounted to manufacture by according the following reasons:- "If the facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing process, it is packed, the end product is commercially known differently. Similar is the situation for vermicelli. For producing instant dalia, the whole process is well known. There is no denying the fact that use of end product is altogether different and it is known differently in commercial world. Even otherwise, the shape and size and use is altogether different from its raw material and also known differently in the commercial world, therefore, it can be said that it is an manufacturin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inct object or article or thing having a different name, character and use; or (b) bringing into existence of a new and distinct object or article or thing with a different chemical composition or integral structure." Though, this amendment was introduced only with effect from 01.04.2009 while we are dealing with the assessments prior to 01.04.2009, yet the same would be of relevance since the definition itself apart from being based on the dictionary meaning has embodied in itself the mean .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nant Ram Chandra Phadke (dead) by L.Rs., AIR 1982 SC 127 which is far more closer to the issue involved in this lis. Therein the question before the Hon'ble Supreme Court related to a lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act and the precise question was as to whether the lease was for a manufacturing process. The following tests for determining whether a lease for running flour mill had been granted for the purpose of manufacturing process were culled out:- "1. That it mu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

labour and machinery. The commodity before manufacture was wheat which could not be consumed by any human being but would be used only for cattle or medicines or similar other purposes. Thereafter, in order to come to the conclusion that the conversion of wheat into wheat flour amounted to manufacturing process, the Hon'ble Supreme Court recorded following reasons:- "11. In the instant case what happened was that wheat was transformed, by the manufacturing process which involved both l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ied. This being the position the irresistible inference and the inescapable conclusion would be that the present lease was one for manufacturing purposes. In this view of the matter, the notice of one month must be held to be invalid and suit for ejectment should have failed on that ground." 15. Applying the aforesaid tests to the instant case, it can conveniently be held that converting gram Dal into Besan will amount to manufacturing process because: i) gram Dal loses its shape and identi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion of gram Dal into Besan amounts to manufacture and consequently the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(4) of the Income Tax Act. Question No.2. 17. Section 80IB (4) of the Act reads thus:- "Deduction in respect of profits and gains from certain industrial undertaking other than infrastructure development undertaking. 80-IB. (1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived from any business referred to in sub-section (3) to [(11) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lip;….. (ii)……….. (iii)………. (iv)………. (3)………… (i)…………. (ii)………… (4) The amount of deduction in the case of an industrial undertaking in an industrially backward State specified in the Eighth Schedule shall be hundred per cent of the profits and gains derived from such industrial undertaking for five assessment years beginning with the initial as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 1993 and ending on the 31st day of March [2004]. Provided further that in the case of such industries in the North-Eastern Region, as may be notified by the Central Government, the amount of deduction shall be hundred per cent of profits and gains for a period of ten assessment years, and the total period of deduction shall in such a case not exceed ten assessment years: Provided also that no deduction under this sub-section shall be allowed for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction under this sub-section shall be allowed to an industrial undertaking in the State of Jammu and Kashmir which is engaged in the manufacture or production of any article or thing specified in Part C of the Thirteenth Schedule.]" 18. It is vehemently argued by learned counsel for the revenue that, no doubt, the allowance of depreciation was made mandatory under explanation 5 to Section 32(i) (ii) with effect from the assessment year 2002-03. However, the profits eligible for deduction un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in a subsequent year, the claim of depreciation in those years would stand reduced. 19. It is not in dispute that the allowance of depreciation was made mandatory only with effect from the assessment year 2002-03 and it is the case of the revenue that assessee has not established its business for the other assessment years. The contention on behalf of the assessee is that the assessee had not claimed any deprecation on fixed assets in the books of accounts so as to claim higher deduction under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Senha Valli Textiles P. Ltd., [2003] 259 I.T.R. 77 wherein it was held as under:- "The question referred to us at the instance of the revenue is, "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that the depreciation should not be allowed to the assessee since he has specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing revised return?" The assessment year is 1988-89. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me an obligation. Though after that judgment was rendered by the Apex Court, Explanation 5 was inserted in section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Finance Act 2001, with effect from April 1, 2002, declaring that "for the removal of doubts" the provisions of sub-section (1) will apply whether or not the assessee claims deduction in respect of depreciation in computing his total income, that Explanation cannot be regarded as taking away the effect of the judgment of the Supreme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and from April 1, 2002, and will not be applicable for prior years." 21. In view of the aforesaid discussion, it is held that the profits eligible for deduction under Section 80IB (4) of the Act though are necessarily to be computed after allowing depreciation under Section 32 of the Act, but the same would apply only from April 1, 2002, when the amendment came into force and will not apply to earlier years. Question No.3. 22. Section 80IB (2) (iv) of the Act reads thus:- "Deduction in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eduction from such profits and gains of an amount equal to such percentage and for such number of assessment years as specified in this section. (2) This section applies to any industrial undertaking which fulfils all the following conditions, namely:- (i)……. (ii)…….. (iii)……. (iv) in a case where the industrial undertaking manufactures or produces articles or things, the undertaking employs ten or more workers in a manufacturing process carried on with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n time the assessee was having more than 10 workers out of whom four employees had been engaged in the two trucks owned by the assessee i.e. two drivers, two cleaners and in case these four workers were excluded, then the assessee at all given times had employed 6 to 9 workers. Though in the reply, the assessee disputed the fact that the drivers and cleaners were not included in the employees list, but then this reply was not found acceptable by the Assessing Officer because the assessee did not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were arrived at after perusing the records which had been produced before the Assessing Officer. 24. The Commissioner of Income Tax affirmed these findings, however, when the matter reached in ITAT, the findings recorded by both the learned authorities below were set aside on the ground that for getting relief under Section 80IB, there must be substantial compliance whereby an undertaking must have employed 10 or more workers substantially during the period for which the claim was made and furt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubstantial compliance when there were 13 employees entered in the attendance register is absolutely erroneous in teeth of the findings recorded by A.O. against which findings there was no contradiction or rebuttal on behalf of the assessee. 8. In M/s Amrit Rubber Industries vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, ITA Nos. 32 of 2004 and 33 of 2004 decided on 30.9.2010, this court was dealing with the interpretation of section 80IA(2) (v), which reads as follows:- "(v) in a case where the industrial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s the employment had to be for a substantial part of a year. It was held as follows:- "3. It is not disputed before us that in one of the appeal, ten or more workers were employed only for two months and in the other, only for six months. This cannot be deemed to fulfill the requirements of the aforesaid clause of Section 80-IA. The employment has to be for a substantial part of a year and employment for two months and six months cannot be termed to be employment for a substantial part of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version