Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Jaipur-I

Waiver of pre deposit - Denial of CENVAT Credit - Reinsurance business - Held that:- Prima facie, when the applicant undertake the insurance, i.e. the insurance date of commencement of risk by the insurance company for covering the insurance of Policy holder and that service has to be provided for a particular period of time as per the agreement. So, the output service is provided by the applicant till the termination of agreement, therefore, the service received by the applicant is a services r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

with Manish Gaur & Narender Singh Advs. For the Respondent : Shri Govind Dixit, AR ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal: The applicant is seeking waiver of pre-deposit of an amount of ₹ 115,78,81,098/- along with interest and equivalent amount of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The period of dispute is from November, 2008 to March, 2012. 2. The facts of the case are that applicant is an insurance company and providing insurance policies like motor insurance, fire insurance, marin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hey are paying the service tax and taking credit thereon. For service received of reinsurance from outside India, the applicant is paying service tax under reverse charge mechanism and availing credit thereof. For motor 3rd party insurance for motor vehicle, there is a mechanism as per IRDA Rules. As per that mechanism, the pool is formed of all the insurance companies and the applicant is part thereof. At the end of each year, as per the direction of the Pool Manager, the insurance company has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cant has taken Cenvat Credit of service tax on the service tax paid by reinsurance company which has been categorized as under: A. The invoices issued by reinsurer company; and B. The invoices issued by pool member of the company on third party motor vehicle insurance their respective to share. Therefore, it was alleged that pool arrangement is sort of collective insurance as to which company is reinsurer company among other. The applicant is also a member of pool, as have been issuing similar i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 to avail Cenvat credit as the invoices issued by the other insurance companies against which the applicant has availed input service credit have not provided the insurance services to the applicant. Therefore, it was alleged that applicant is not entitled to take Cenvat credit on the invoices issued by reinsurer or the pool members to the appellant under Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004 as these are not input service read with Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the services received by them. Therefore, whatever service tax has been paid by them, is entitled to Cenvat credit. Further, he submits that as per Rule 9 of the CCR. 2004, the invoices issued by a service provider is a proper document against which they have taken the Cenvat credit. He further submits that a similar issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of PNB Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. CCE [2014 (36) STR 891 (Tri-Bang)] wherein Tribunal held that re-insurance is an input .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rvice provided by the applicant as Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004. For availment of Cenvat credit on third party motor vehicle insurance, he submits that there is a pool and applicant himself is a member of pool and therefore whatever services, they have provided, that service is provided by the members of pool to each other. The services received by the applicant is the service provided by the applicant as member of pool to each other. For denial of Cenvat credit on third party motor vehicle insura .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s case, prima facie, we are having two issues namely (A) whether the appellant is entitled to take input service credit on reinsurance service under Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004 or not and (B) whether the appellant is entitled to avail input service credit on the invoices issued by reinsurance company who is a member of pool as per Rule 9 of the CCR, 2004 without receiving the service. 7. For the first issue, the core reason to deny the Cenvat credit is that the service has been availed by the app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version