Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 823 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2015 (5) TMI 823 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - [2015] 379 ITR 36 (Bom) - Disallowance u/s 14A - Tribunal setting aside and restoring back the issue to the file of the AO for denovo adjudication by relying on the judgment of M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd [2010 (8) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - Held that:- The tribunal directed that the matter is required to be reconsidered by the assessing officer. He shall examine the relevant accounts, the nature of term loans and availability of interest free funds .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

panies Act, 1956, they have been approved by the Registrar of Companies, then, the assessing officer must take those accounts into consideration. If the assessee has not debited any actual expenditure relating to the earning of the exempt income, therefore, the provisions of section 14A cannot be imported into the computation of book profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, even clause (f) of Explanation to section 115JB which refers to those amounts which are debited t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5 (5) TMI 810 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]would govern the present case. The facts and circumstances being identical, we do not think that the appeal should be entertained on question nos.1 and 3 above - Decided against revenue.

Interest under section 234B - Held that:- The liability to pay interest would only arise on default and is really in the nature of a quasi punishment. The liability to tax although credited retrospectively could not entail the punishment of payment of interest with re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cided against revenue. - Income Tax Appeal No. 1468 of 2013 - Dated:- 30-4-2015 - S. C. Dharmadhikari And A. K. Menon,JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Tejveer Singh For the Respondents : Mr Porus Kaka, Sr Counsel along with Mr Manish Kanth and Mr Melvyn Fernandes JUDGMENT P. C. 1. We have heard Mr.Tejveer Singh in support of this appeal. This appeal by the revenue challenges the order passed on 22nd February, 2013 by the Income Tax, Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Mumbai in Income Tax Appeal No.244 of 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on this issue ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble Tribunal is right in law to hold that no interest u/s.234B can be levied consequent to inclusion of various items while computing the book profit as per in the Explanation to section 115JB which has been brought on the statute by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 01, April 2001 ? (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble Tribun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the said Act. 3. The assessing officer noted that the assessee had earned dividend income of ₹ 6,42,35,165/- from shares in JSW Steels Ltd. The total investment of the assessee company from which the dividend was receivable has been illustrated in the assessment order. However, the assessing officer noted that the total interest expenses were shown by the assessee at ₹ 49,74,06,913/- during the year and investment to the tune of ₹ 154.47 crores made on 29th March, 2005 was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quired to furnish the details of expenses liable to be disallowed under this provision. The assessee submitted detailed explanation as to why interest and other expenditure cannot be disallowed for earning of the dividend income. However, the assessing officer after applying Rule-8D calculated the disallowance of ₹ 8,94,26,131/-. The assessing officer while making MAT calculation under section 115JB has also added the expenditure to the book profit. Aggrieved by this order of the assessmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the issue afresh and directing restoration as above, the Tribunal deleted addition of ₹ 8,94,26,631 made by the assessing officer under section 14A read with Explanation 1 of section 115JB of the said Act for the purpose of computing book profit under that provision of Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, question nos.1 and 3 are substantial questions of law. 6. Mr.Kaka, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that very questions were projected and proposed as su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat question nos. 1 and 3 do not arise from the order of remand or restoration back to the assessing officer. 7. Mr.Tejveer Singh would submit that clause (f) of Explanation (1) to section 115JB of the said Act cannot be lost sight of and the assessing officer must take note of it while reconsidering the issue. Hence the substantial of law would arise for determination and consideration. 8. We have found from reading of the impugned order of the Tribunal that insofar as the first question is con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er. He shall examine the relevant accounts, the nature of term loans and availability of interest free funds with the assessee. After examining all these details and account, and only if some reasonable disallowance can be adopted that should be worked out and in relation to earning of the dividend. The asssesee was also directed to furnish necessary details and working before the assessing officer. 9. However, the tribunal also noted that by way of additional ground the assessee challenged disa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of section 14A cannot be imported into the computation of book profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, even clause (f) of Explanation to section 115JB which refers to those amounts which are debited to the Profit and Loss account, alone can be added to the book profit, cannot apply. Then, the tribunal referred to the order passed in the case of Essar Teleholdings Ltd. (supra). Mr.Kaka, learned Senior Counsel is right that in case of Essar Teleholdings when similar is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by: Mr Abhay Ahuja with Ms Padma Divakar Respondent Rep by: None P. C. 1. We have heard Mr Ahuja, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant on the questions which have been termed as substantial questions of law. They are formulated in this Memo of Appeal by the Revenue at page 3. They read as under: "(A) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in setting aside and restoring back the issue to the file of AO for de novo adjudica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing Officer has given a finding with regard to the course to be adopted after restoration by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal should not have done this. In such circumstances, the Appeal raises substantial questions of law. We are of the view that the Tribunal had only reiterated in paragraph 8 of the order under challenge delivered on 29th July 2011 the finding on the expenditure as per rule 8D r/w section 14A of the Income Tax Act 1961. In relation to that, the Tribunal held that Rule 8D i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

im or has accepted the contentions raised before it by either side. In these circumstances and when the Assessing Officer is expected to determine the claim afresh and in accordance with law, we do not see any basis for the apprehension and which is voiced by Mr Ahuja. With this additional clarification, the Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. Appeal is dismissed. No costs. ( B.P. COLABAWALLA J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI J.)" 10. Having held that the matter is sent back to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stion nos.1 and 3. 11. Then, Mr.Tejveer Singh vehemently contended that in relation to question no.2, the findings require detailed probe by this Court. He submits that the Tribunal was not right in law when it held that no interest under section 234B of the I.T. Act can be levied. Though several items have to be calculated while computing book profit and in terms of explanation to section 115JB of the I.T. Act, that explanation has been brought on the statute book and with retrospective effect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessed tax. Thus, this is a provision whereunder interest could be recovered wherein advance tax for the assessment year fails to take note of the amendment to the Income Tax Act which is brought in subsequently. When the Parliament stepped into to amend the Act though with retrospective effect but in 2008, then, there is no default in payment of advance tax for the assessment year 2006-07. The computation of income based on which the advance tax was paid was in tune with the law prevailing o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th restrospective effect from 1st April, 2001. Prior to the same it read as under: "4. Substituted for the portion beginning with the words "if any amount referred" and ending with the words "as reduced by -" by the Finance Act, 2008, w.r.e.f. 1.4.2001." Prior to its substitution, read as under: "If any amount referred to in clauses (a) to (g), is debited to the Profit and Loss account, and as reduced by …." 15. The Tribunal in this regard noted riv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tract the provisions contained in section 234B and 234C of the Act, it must be established that the assessee had the liability to pay advance tax as provided under sections 207 and 208 of the I.T. Act within the time prescribed under section 211 of that Act. Noting the rival contentions, the Calcutta High Court proceeded to hold that the last date of relevant financial year was 31st March, 2001 and on that date, admittedly, the appellant before it had no liability to pay any amount of advance ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t some of the amounts included in the book profits as per Explanation (h) to section 115JB were brought in by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 2001. The assessee cannot be held to be liable for failing to make a provision for payment of advance tax which was not possible on the last date as per the law then prevailing. Thus, clause (h) which is reproduced above having been brought in with retrospective effect but by Finance Act 2008, the advance tax computation by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ility to make any payment for service tax on the ground that it did not broadcast. The Commissioner, however, held against the appellant. The matter was carried before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and during pendency of appeal the Finance Act, 2001 was amended by the Finance Act, 2002. The effect of amendment, inter alia, was to make an agent, such as the appellant, before the Supreme Court, liable to pay service tax as broadcaster. 19. The Supreme Court noted that the Appellants' .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pplying section 234B or any analogus provision and payment of interest. It is in that regard that the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under: "7. In any event, it is clear from the language of the validation clause, as quoted by us earlier, that the liability was extended not by way of clarification but by way of amendment to the Finance Act with retrospective effect. It is well established that while it is permissible for the Legislature to retrospectively legislate, such, retrospectivity .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version