Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s RY Midas Metacast Pvt Ltd & 1 Versus Union of India & 3

2015 (5) TMI 834 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Import of aluminum waste and scrap to manufacture of circles and tubes - Exemption of customs duty - Notification No.12/2012 – Held that:- So far as the circle is concerned, this objection was raised by the Revenue in the very first assessment order passed by the Assessing Authority dated 9.3.2011 which was not accepted by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad by judgment dated 2.9.2011 and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was pleased to allow the appeal of the petitioners. There .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad was not justified in holding that new fact has come into existence over-looking the finding of fact recorded by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad in its earlier judgment dated 2.9.2011. Therefore, the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad cannot be maintained. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Special Civil Application No. 6089 of 2015 - Dated:- 20-4-2015 - Vijay Manohar Sahai, ACJ And R. D. Kothari,JJ. For the Appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). 4. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is an importer of aluminum waste and scrap. That from said waste and scrap, petitioner manufactures aluminum plates and sheets as well as he gets manufactured circles from the plates, sheets and utensils in his own factory. He claims exemption of customs duty of the raw material imported by him under Notification No.12/2012 - Central Excise dated 17.3.2012. 4.1 The executing authority by judgment dated 9.3.2011, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bmitted details of manufacturing process along with flow chart, details of plants & machineries installed in the unit, Chartered Engineer s certificate dated 17.10.2010 and photographs showing the manufacturing process of aluminum plates/sheet and utensils, to prove that impugn goods were first converted into unwrought aluminum plate and sheet and subsequently the same are used fort manufacture of aluminum circle to be used for manufacture of utensils...." 4.3 Therefore, after recording .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ills of entry were filed by the petitioners, for which exemption was not granted by the Assessing Authority. However, the Commissioners of Customs (Appeals) allowed the appeals of the petitioner. The judgment of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) are filed at Annexure-E, Annexure-G and Annexure-H. Subsequently, two Assessing Officers accepted the contentions of the petitioner. The assessment order has been filed at Annexure-A and Annexure- F. Therefore, the dispute between the parties that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich have come to the notice but, in order to maintain judicial discipline, he has granted exemption to the petitioner. 4.6 The Department has filed an appeal challenging the order of Deputy Commissioner, dated 12.11.2014 before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the Department and held that petitioner is not entitled for benefit of exemption provided by a Notification No.12/2012 on the ground that new facts hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal of the petitioners. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that there was no new facts which came into light on the basis of which the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad jumped to the conclusion that new facts are emerged and the petitioner is manufacturing circles. When there were already six orders - as pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner -, in favour of petitioner passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad as well as by the Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version