Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Central Circle-08, New Delhi Versus M/s. NIIT Ltd.

Eligibility of deduction u/s 10B - whether the three units of the assessee company namely NIITITES, NIIT-KTWO and NIIT-Mumbai are separate 100% EOUs of the assessee company ? - Held that:- Each of the three undertakings had been separately and independently granted registration by Software Technology Park of India, Pune (STPI) for claiming exemption u/s 10B of the act as newly set up 100% EOU, which is evident from the copies of STPI approval and extension letters thereto. Those three units were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mitted fact that these units were not having separate books of accounts but ERP software accounting system was implemented by each of them and transactions of each unit were separately coded all the transaction were identifiable as in the case of separate books. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) was fully justified in directing the AO to compute the deduction u/s 10B of the Act in respect of each unit separately. - Decided in favour of assesse.

Allowability of deduction u/s 10B - at the sourc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on was adjusted by the assessee against certain income from other sources and not against the eligible profits of the 100% EOU. - Decided against revenue.

Admission of the additional evidence - Held that:- AO vide notice u/s 142(1) of the Act called the details relating to claim u/s 10B of the Act which the assessee furnished. The ld. CIT(A) found from the record that the assessee replied to the showcause regarding the allowability of deduction u/s 10B of the Act vide submissions date .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee before him goes to the route of the aforesaid issue relating to deduction u/s 10B of the Act. In the present case, the ld. CIT(A) admitted those evidences after providing due and reasonable opportunity to the AO who furnished his remand report. Therefore, we do not see any merit in this ground of the departmental appeal - Decided against revenue. - ITA No. 1112/Del/2012 - Dated:- 8-5-2015 - Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. I. C. Sudhir, JM,JJ. For the Petitioner : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv., Rohi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and profits arising there from have to be allowed as deduction under that section separately. 2. That the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) erred in law and on facts of the case in holding that the deduction u/s 10B of the Act is allowable at the source itself and not after the computation of Gross Total Income. 3. That the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) erred in law and on facts of the case in allowing that deducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dings. 5. That the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) erred in law and on facts of the case in allowing the deduction u/s 10B of the Act to the assessee at ₹ 7,83,34,105/- as claimed by it instead of deduction of ₹ 2,96,15,440/- as allowed by the Assessing Officer. 6. (a) The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and not tenable in law and on facts. (b) The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any/all of the grounds of appeal before or during the course of the hearing of the app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the assessee had 3 independent and separate 100% Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU) which were engaged in the same line of business and no separate books of accounts had been maintained for these units so these were in fact expansion of the same business. The AO also raised the doubt about the allocation of expenses to these units to arrive at the conclusion that deduction could not be calculated in respect of the units separately. He, therefore, calculated the deduction u/s 10B of the Act by a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0% EOU and they had also been issued separate export licences by Customs Authorities. The assessee also furnished the evidences to establish that those units had separate fixed assets, plants & machinery and furniture & fixtures etc. It was submitted that each of the three EOU had independent, separate and distinct operations as indicated in the evidences furnished in the form of copies of softex forms, invoices, foreign inward remittance certificates, custom bonded register maintained b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed Audit Report in Form No. 56G which also requires the certificate from a Chartered Accountant who certify the amount claimable as deduction u/s 10B of the Act on the basis of examination of accounts and records of the assessee relating to the business of the eligible undertaking. It was pointed out that the said report also did not refer to any separate books to be maintained or required to be maintained by the eligible EOU. The reliance was placed on the decision of the ITAT Mumbai Benches in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee observed that it was not the case of the AO that the three eligible units had been formed by splitting up or reconstructing the old or non-eligible units and since there were enough evidence in the assessee s case that the three Export Oriented Units were formed independently of the existing units for the purpose of export of software and those were approved as such by the relevant authorities and they had been functioning independently of each other for the purposes of business of expo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he order of the AO and further submitted that the assessee was not maintaining separate books of accounts because all the three units were in fact expansion of the same business as those were engaged in the same line of business. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in directing the AO to consider each unit as separate for claiming deduction u/s 10B of the Act. 7. In his rival submissions the ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the authorities below and str .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ming deduction u/s 10B of the Act and they cannot be treated as single unit. 8. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is noticed that the AO treated the three Export Oriented Undertaking of the assessee as a single unit, only on this basis that separate books of accounts were not maintained, on the contrary, each of the three undertakings had been separately and independently granted registr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

buildings on separate addresses, their Plant & Machinery and fixed assets were also separate, each of the EOU furnished separate Audit Report in Form No. 56G. Therefore, it cannot be said that the three EOU s of the assessee company were formed after splitting off of the existing unit or reconstructing the old or non-eligible unit. In the present case, although it is an admitted fact that these units were not having separate books of accounts but ERP software accounting system was implement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

O, during the course of assessment proceedings observed that all the three different units of the assessee were not operating in isolation as claimed and it was only for the purpose of computing deduction u/s 10B of the Act that the assessee tried to allocate the expenses between various units for computing deduction under the said section and that the profits of the units eligible for deduction u/s 10B of the Act were disproportionately high as compared to the total business of the assessee. He .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er assessment year. According to the AO, the assessee had been wrongly computed unabsorbed depreciation in the earlier years by first claiming deduction u/s 10B of the Act, while computing income under the head profits and gains of business or profession and not out of the gross total income, after adjusting unabsorbed depreciation, if any, carry forward from earlier years. The AO also observed that in case there was any unabsorbed depreciation relating to the earlier assessment years which was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bmitted that the deduction u/s 10B of the Act was allowable from profits of the eligible business as computed under the head business income and such profits were the individual profits of the eligible units computed before setting off of brought forward unabsorbed losses/depreciation, if any, of non-eligible undertakings required to be set off, subsequently at the stage of computing gross total income under Chapter VI of the Act. It was further stated that the facts of the case relied by the AO .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

following case laws: ACIT Vs Yokogawa India Ltd. 111 TTJ 548 (Trib) Changepond Technologies (P.) Ltd. Vs ACIT 119 TTJ 18 (Chenn.) KPIT Cummins Infosystems (Bangalore) (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (2008) 26 SOT 529 (Bang.) Reliq Software (P) Limited Vs ITO 125 ITD 101 (Bang.) CIT Vs Mahan Foods Ltd. 216 CTR 148 (Del.) CIT Vs Gedore Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd. 126 ITR 673 (Del.) DCIT Vs Arabian Exports Ltd. 109 TTJ 440 (Mum.) 11. The ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee observed that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax. The Hon ble High Court after analyzing the entire scheme held that the unabsorbed depreciation of the EOU had to be adjusted against the eligible profit before allowing exemption/deduction u/s 10B of the Act and that by claiming set off of unabsorbed depreciation of the eligible undertaking against income from other sources, the assessee had virtually taken exemption from payment of tax even in respect of other business income which was clearly not permissible. Whereas in assessee s case, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le undertaking without setting off the losses or unabsorbed brought forward depreciation. The reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs Yokogawa India Ltd. reported at 246 CTR 226. 12. Now the department is in appeal. The ld. DR reiterated the observations of the AO and strongly supported the assessment order dated 31.12.2009. It was further submitted that it is an accepted position of law that first business profit has to be determined based o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orities below and further submitted that the deduction u/s 10B of the Act is allowable in respect of profit derived by the eligible undertaking, quantified in terms of sub-section (4) of section 10B of the Act i.e. qua the profits of each undertaking as if such undertaking was the only source of income of the assessee. It was further submitted that the deduction u/s 10B of the Act was to be provided from income under the head profits and gains of business or profession immediately after deductio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e laws: CIT Vs Yokogawa India Ltd. 246 CTR 226 (Kar.) Black & Veatch Consulting Pvt. Ltd. 348 ITR 72 (Bom.) CIT Vs Tyco Electronics Tools India (P) Ltd. 205 Taxman 403 (Kar.) CIT Vs Galaxy Surfactants Ltd. (2012) 249 CTR 38 (Bom.) Scientific Atlanta India Technology (P) Limited CIT Vs TEI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 210 Taxman 237 (Del.) 14. It was further submitted that the assessee had rightly claimed deduction u/s 10B of the Act on the basis of independent/separate profits of each of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted Units (EOU s). Therefore, adjustment in the eligible profits of the EOU was not to be made on account of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation. The said unabsorbed depreciation was adjusted by the assessee against certain income from other sources and not against the eligible profits of the 100% EOU. 16. On a similar issue the Hon ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs Yokogawa India Ltd. 341 ITR 385 held as under: That as the profits and gains under section 10A were not to be incl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

siness loss being set off against such profit and gains of the undertaking would not arise. 17. Similary, the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs TEI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 361 ITR 36 (Del.) held as under: That for computing deduction under section 10A in respect of an export processing zone unit, the losses suffered in the non-export processing zone unit need not be set off against the profits/income of the export processing zone unit. The brought forward losses of the non-e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed that the assessee did not furnish the evidences before the AO in the course of assessment proceedings, therefore, the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in admitting the additional evidences. The ld. Counsel for the assessee in his rival submissions submitted that the ld. CIT(A) forwarded the additional evidences to the AO under the provisions of Rules 46A of the Income Tax Rules and the AO submitted his report dated 08.08.2011. Therefore, it cannot be said that the ld. CIT(A) did not provide the o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version