Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ITO Versus M/s. Jyotindra Brothers

Rejection of the books results u/s 145(3) - fall in Gross Profit / difference in sales - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT(A), while deleting the addition, has given a finding that the amount of loss of ₹ 15,15,785/- represented loss of 43,555 Kgs of Ispaghula Seeds which have been duly accounted for in the audited accounts of the assessee and the assessee had also submitted the proper reconciliation and reasons for the fall in Gross Profit. Before us, the Revenue has not broug .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ative also pointed out to the cost of fund, the rate at which it has lent and from the statement submitted by the ld. AR, it is seen that the amount which has been lent to M/s. Swati Autolink Pvt Ltd is at a higher rate than the weighted average cost of funds. Before us, it is also the assessee’s submission that the amounts were advanced in earlier years also and no disallowance was made in the earlier years, for which reliance was placed on judgment of Sridev Enterprises (1991 (1) TMI 52 - KARN .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2015 - Shri Rajpal Yadav And Shri Anil Chaturvedi JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Dinesh Singh, Sr. DR. For the Respondent : Shri S. N. Soparkar, AR ORDER Per Shri Anil Chaturvedi, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue and the Cross-Objection filed by the assessee, both against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XX, Ahmedabad dated 12.09.2011 for Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The brief facts of the case, as culled out from the records, are as under:- 3. The asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A) who vide order dated 12.09.2011 granted substantial relief to the assessee. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the Ld CIT(A), the Revenue is now in appeal before us and the assessee has also filed cross-objection. 4. The Grounds raised by the Revenue in its appeal read as under:- 1. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-XX, Ahmedabad has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 15,15,785/- made by the Assessing Officer, on account of rejecting the books result .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Income- Tax (Appeals)-XX, Ahmedabad may be set-aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored. 5. On the other hand, the assessee has taken following grounds in its Cross-objections:- Ld. CIT (A) erred in confirming disallowance of ₹ 4,95,651/- out of interest expenses claimed by holding that advances given to Swati Autolink Pvt Ltd were from interest bearing funds ignoring the fact that complete details of the availability of interest free funds in earlier year when advances were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Assessing Officer noticed that the quantitative information with respect to inward and outward of Ispaghula shown by the assessee was not reconciled. He also noticed that the assessee s submission of loss due to infestation was not debited in the Profit and Loss account. He was, therefore, of the view that the assessee was not showing the true facts in the books of accounts. Further, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had not produced any evidence of infestation/loss or shortage. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ompared to immediately preceding year, worked out the Gross Profit at ₹ 9,76,201/- for the year under consideration and the difference in sales in the quantitative figures as worked out by him was ₹ 15,15,785/-, was added to the income. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A) who, after considering the submissions of the assessee, deleted the addition vide order dated 12.09.2011 by holding as under:- 4.2(i) The contentions of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5/- represented loss of 43,555 Kgs of Ispaghula seeds, duly accounted for in the audited account of the appellant. The basis on which the reconciliation of the seeds submitted by the appellant and the reasons for the fall in GP explained by the appellant were rejected by the AO, is not found logical. Therefore, I hold that the impugned addition is not sustainable. It is deleted. These grounds of appeal are allowed. 9. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is now in appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rused the material available on record. We find that the ld. CIT(A), while deleting the addition, has given a finding that the amount of loss of ₹ 15,15,785/- represented loss of 43,555 Kgs of Ispaghula Seeds which have been duly accounted for in the audited accounts of the assessee and the assessee had also submitted the proper reconciliation and reasons for the fall in Gross Profit. Before us, the Revenue has not brought any material on record to controvert the findings of the ld. CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enses of ₹ 24,88,291/-. He also noticed that the assessee has given ₹ 4,35,50,183/- to Swati Autolink Pvt Ltd on which it had charged interest at the rate of 6.75%; but on the other hand the assessee was paying interest at 9%. The submission of the assessee that its weighted average interest cost was 4.91% as against which it had charged at 6.75% interest on M/s. Swati Autolink Pvt Ltd was not found acceptable to the Assessing Officer as the assessee had not furnished any cash flow s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(iv) Swati Psyllium Pvt Ltd and (v) Swati Agrotech Pvt Ltd. He was also of the view that the assessee has utilized interest bearing funds for advancing noninterest bearing loans. He accordingly calculated the interest expenses at 9% on the amount advanced and worked out the interest expenses of ₹ 9,08,966/- and thus made an aggregate disallowance of ₹ 18,88,846/-. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

given to 5 other concerns totaling to ₹ 1,00,99,625/- and worked out the disallowance of ₹ 9,08,966/-. Put together he made disallowance of ₹ 18,88,846/-. 5.4 The contentions of the learned AR in this regard in brief are as follow: AO did not consider the detailed submission made by the appellant vide his letter dated 1-12-2010.; the advance given to Swati Autolink was reduced during the year; complete details of the availability of interest free funds in earlier year when adva .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

est bearing funds. Thus out of advance given to Swati Autolink of ₹ 4,35,50,183/- was out of interest-free funds, the sum of ₹ 2,15,21,244/, leaving the balance of ₹ 2,20,28,939/- advanced out of funds borrowed on interest @ 9%. The advance was given on interest @ 6.75%. Therefore, I consider it reasonable to work out the disallowance of interest @ 2.25% (9% minus 6.75%) on ₹ 2,20,28,939/- which works out to ₹ 4,95,651/-. Thus disallowance of interest of ₹ 4,9 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee, on the other hand, submitted that there was no question of disallowing any interest expenditure as the assessee has earned net interest income of ₹ 11,81,410. He further pointed to the statement which was placed at page no.46 of the paper-book and demonstrated that weighted average interest cost was 4.91% and it has charged interest from on M/s. Swati Autolink Pvt Ltd at 6.75% and thus, it has not advanced money to M/s. Swati Autolink Pv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

He further submitted that the amount had been advanced in earlier years also but no disallowance was made in the earlier years and therefore, no disallowance can be made in the year under consideration and for which he placed reliance on the decision of Hon ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT v. Sridev Enterprises, reported in (1991) 192 ITR 165 (Kar). He further submitted that no disallowance at all on account of interest was called for. 15. We have heard the rival submissions and peru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version