Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Vistaar Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-10 (1) , Mumbai

TP adjustment - adjustment of ₹ 51,20,400/- to the value of international transactions by accepting the CUP method - Held that:- By applying the rate difference of ₹ 150/- per hour to the number of hours charged to AE at 34,136, the CIT(A) arrived at adjustment of ₹ 51,20,400/- as against adjustment of ₹ 73,46,647/- made by AO. We found that in assessee’s own case in A.Y.2003-04 to 2007-08 vide order dated 25-5-2012 the Tribunal had deleted the adjustment made by TPO by a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st adjustment of ₹ 73,46,647/- made by TPO. Detailed finding recorded by CIT(A) at para 2 of his order has not been controverted by ld. AR by bringing any positive material on record. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the findings recorded by the CIT(A) resulting into addition of ₹ 51,20,400/-. - Decided against assesse.

Adjusting the brought forward losses against the income of section 10A unit, before deduction u/s.10A - held that:- As relying on cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- SHRI R.C.SHARMA AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JJ. For The Assessee : Shri V.Chandrasekhar & Shri Harshad Shah For The Revenue : Shri N.Padmanaban ORDER PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M.) : These are the cross appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue against the order of CIT(A) dated 29-6-2011 for the assessment year 2008-09, in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3) of the I.T.Act. 2. The assessee in its appeal (ITA No.5979/M/2011) has taken following grounds :- 1. The order of the authorities below in so far .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax (Appeal) has erred in making a adjustment of ₹ 51,20,400/- to the value of international transactions by accepting the CUP method adopted by Appellant but rejecting the appellant's adjustments to Comparable Uncontrolled Prices on law and facts of the case. 4. Without Prejudice the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming learned Assessing Officer's order of adjusting the brought forward losses against the income of section 10A unit, before deduction u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal were not pressed by ld. AR, the same are, therefore, dismissed in limine as not pressed. 5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the record. Facts in brief are that the assessee is 99.997% subsidiary of USA based company and is into software development having a Software Technological Park as EOU in Vashi, Navi-Mumbai approved on 11.8.2000. In the course of scrutiny assessment u/s.143(3), the AO observed that perusal of the return of income and the audited accounts enclosed therew .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the international transaction was rejected by the department and TNMM method was applied after detailed discussions made in those orders. It was observed in those orders that the assessee had failed to explain or provide details whether the third party transactions are comparable to its international transactions in every respect which is an essential prerequisite for adopting the CUP method. In view of the above, the AO made TP adjustment of ₹ 73,46,697/-. 6. By the impugned order CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red for the purpose of comparability. It is the submission of the assessee and bench mark analysis conducted by the appellant that the rates, the skill set and job description for the Junior Developer and Senior Developer is comparable to the services provided by the TCS. The TCS provides such services at ₹ 1000 per hour and the rates charged to the AE for the junior level developer as per the agreement of the appellant with its AE and as mentioned in the transfer pricing report is ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ior Developer and the comparable rate taken by the appellant which is rate charged by the TCS - ₹ 1000 per hour. The number of hours charged to the AE for Junior Developer is at 34,136 hours. As mentioned above, there is difference in the comparable rate vis-a-vis the rate charged to the AE of ₹ 150/- per hour. Accordingly, an adjustment of an amount of ₹ 51,20,400/- (Rs.150 x number of hours for junior developer billed at 34136 hours) is required to value of this international .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ethod as mentioned above is required to arrive at the ALP of the appellant's international transaction. Therefore, the appellant gets a relief of ₹ 22, 26,247/- in this ground of appeal. Accordingly, this ground of appeal is partly allowed. 7. Regarding ground No.3, the assessee is aggrieved for TP adjustment of ₹ 51,20,400/- retained by CIT(A) by rejecting assessee s adjustment to comparable uncontrolled price. 7.1 Ld. AR placed on record order of Tribunal in assessee s own case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amounts paid to them, represent fair market value. When the assessee adopts these rates as comparable under CUP method no fault can be found. In view of the above discussion, we uphold the following findings of the first appellate authority. i) The rates charged by the assessee company are identical to the rates charged by the third parties in the same line of business for the same job and the assessee has proved the same with evidence. ii) The TPO has not brought out any material on record to p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see that the assessee is not a normal software service company and is in fact engaged in B.I/ERP Project Development which is a kind of R&D activity for which the Revenue would arise only after development of the project fully; vii) The TPO ignored the agreement of the assessee with the AE that it has been given absolute right for exploitation of the project in the Indian region and nearby territory after its development; 7.2 We have considered rival contentions, carefully gone through the o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by assessee from its AE as mentioned in the transfer pricing report is ₹ 850/- per hour. By applying the rate difference of ₹ 150/- per hour to the number of hours charged to AE at 34,136, the CIT(A) arrived at adjustment of ₹ 51,20,400/- as against adjustment of ₹ 73,46,647/- made by AO. We found that in assessee s own case in A.Y.2003-04 to 2007-08 vide order dated 25-5-2012 the Tribunal had deleted the adjustment made by TPO by accepting CUP as most appropriate method .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de by TPO. Detailed finding recorded by CIT(A) at para 2 of his order has not been controverted by ld. AR by bringing any positive material on record. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the findings recorded by the CIT(A) resulting into addition of ₹ 51,20,400/-. 8. The next grievance of the assessee was that the AO was not justified in adjusting the brought forward losses against the income of section 10A unit, before deduction u/s.10A. 8.1 We have considered rival con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version