Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 76 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

2015 (6) TMI 76 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 569 (Jhar.) - Denial of MODVAT Credit - Non compliance with Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Held that:- There is no breach of the Central Excise Act nor there is any breach of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Modvat credit claimed by the respondent upon certain inputs. It is not in dispute that those inputs have been brought into the factory of the respondent. It is also not in dispute that these inputs have also been utilised fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y true but here in the facts of the present case there is no allegation levelled by the Excise Department in their show-cause notice. Twice the benefits have been claimed, one by the importer (refund of the countervailing duty) and another by the manufacturer-respondent (Modvat credit upon the inputs). It is the case of the appellant that if one benefit is availed another is not allowed. In the facts of the present case only the manufacturer who is the respondent has claimed the Modvat credit. E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

12 - Dated:- 6-4-2015 - MR. D.N. PATEL AND MR. PRAMATH PATNAIK, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Adv. For The Respondent : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. Per D.N. Patel, J : 1. This Tax Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, East Zonal Bench, Kolkata (hereinafter referred as CESTAT ). By the order dated 19th October, 2011 appeal preferred by the respondent has been allowed and, therefore, respondent h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s that the importer is not going to claim refund of countervailing duty. In the eventualities only the respondent can get Modvat credit. In the facts of the present case, the importer of the goods has not given any declaration along with bill of entry that he will not claim the refund of countervailing duty and, therefore, the respondent has wrongly availed Modvat credit. This is the main argument canvassed by the counsel for the appellant. It is also submitted by the counsel for the appellant t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entral Excise Rules, 1944. Modvat credit claimed by the respondent upon certain inputs. It is not in dispute that those inputs have been brought into the factory of the respondent. It is also not in dispute that these inputs have also been utilised for manufacturing process. If these two facts have established, looking to the order in original, then it appears that there is substantial compliance of the Rules, 1944. II. It is also not the case of the appellant that the original importer has also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version