Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Ltd. Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

Revision u/s 263 - directing AO to compute book profit u/s 115JB of the Act - Held that:- . It is well known that ld. CIT can exercise power u/s 263 of the Act, on fulfillment of the twin conditions enshrined in the said provision cumulatively. The conditions are, an order sought to be revised must be erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interests of revenue. In absence of any one of the aforesaid conditions, exercise of power u/s 263 becomes invalid. In the present case, even assuming that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Decided in favour of assesse. - ITA No. 706/Hyd/2013 - Dated:- 25-3-2015 - Shri B. Ramakotaiah And Shri Saktijit Dey JJ. For the Appellant : Shri D.V. Anjaneyulu For the Respondent : Smt. G. Aparna Rao ORDER Per Saktijit Dey, J.M.: This appeal by assessee is directed against the order dated 09/01/2014 passed by ld. CIT-III, Hyderabad u/s 263 of the Act for the AY 2008-09. 2. Briefly the facts are, assessee a company is engaged in manufacturing and sale of cement. For the AY under consideration .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent agreement, assessee was to receive 11.655% of the constructed area. Besides constructed area, the developer also agreed to pay interest from refundable deposits of ₹ 10 crores and non-refundable deposits of ₹ 43.10 crores to assessee. Further, as per the development agreement dated 08/07/07, the developer agreed to pay an additional amount of ₹ 11 crores to the owner of the land as non-refundable consideration. On going through the development agreement cum GPA, AO was of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

43(3) of the Act vide order dated 31/12/2010 computing long term capital gain (LTCG) at ₹ 79,69,38,698. Being aggrieved of such assessment order, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). 3. During the pendency of appeal before ld. CIT(A), ld. CIT in exercise of power u/s 263 of the Act called for assessment records of assessee for the impugned AY and after verification of the same was of the view that assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue as AO while com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by assessee that section 115JB would apply where the income assessed and tax thereon under the normal provisions is less than the book profit and tax thereon. However, since in case of assessee, the income determined by AO and the consequent income-tax there on is much more than the book profit as well as the tax to be paid thereon, neither there is any error in the assessment order nor it is prejudicial to the interests of revenue. Further, it was submitted by assessee that even otherwise also, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee in the return of income stands restored and assessee would be liable to pay the tax computed under section 115JB. However, as AO has failed to compute book profit u/s 115JB of the Act, assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. As far as the merits of the issue is concerned, ld. CIT held that for claiming relief u/s 115JB(2)(vii), the mandatory condition is there must be an order from BIFR u/s 17(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985. As in assessee s c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

profit u/s 115JB of the Act. Being aggrieved of the order of ld. CIT, assessee is before us. 4. Ld. AR submitted before us, invoking power u/s 263 of the Act for the purpose of directing AO to compute book profit u/s 115JB of the Act is without jurisdiction as AO has enquired into the matter and examined the issue in course of assessment proceeding. Ld. AR referring to the show cause notice issued by AO on 18/11/10 and 21/12/10 as well as assessee s reply dated 30/11/10 submitted before us that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cising power u/s 263 of the Act, can consider the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue on the basis of the facts and materials on record as on the date of completion of assessment. However, in the present case, only because ld. CIT(A) subsequently passed the order holding that capital gain would be taxable in AY 2006-07 by virtue of which the income returned by assessee was restored, for that reason alone, it cannot be held that assessment order is erroneo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appellate authority. Therefore, even if there might be an error in the assessment order for not computing the book profit, but, there is no prejudice caused to revenue as income computed under normal provisions was much more than the book profit u/s 115JB and the demand raised on such income computed under normal provisions is enforceable as per the provisions of law. Ld. AR submitted, as there was no prejudice caused to revenue by virtue of the assessment order, one of the conditions of section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

im that section 115JB is not applicable as it is a sick company having accumulated losses, cannot be accepted in absence of an order from BIFR u/s 17(1) of the Act, Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985. 6. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the materials on record. We have also carefully applied our mind to the decisions relied upon by ld. AR. At the outset, it needs to be put on record that the primary contention of ld. AR while challenging the impugned order passed u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ick company, there is no book profit. As can be seen from the show cause notices issued by AO on 30/11/10 and 18/11/10 in course of assessment proceeding, copies of which are placed at pages 27 to 34 of assessee s paper book, AO during the assessment proceeding did conduct enquiry with regard to applicability of section 115JB. From the reply submitted by assessee on 30/11/10, a copy of which is at page 32 of paper book, it is seen that assessee submitted that since it is a sick company as per th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 23,78,47,932. Whereas the book profit as per the assessee s computation, which is also not disputed by ld. CIT, is ₹ 45,08,84,000 and tax thereon is ₹ 4,64,41,052. Therefore, the income computed under the normal provisions and tax thereon being much more than the tax payable on the book profit computed u/s 115JB of the Act, AO proceeded to complete assessment and enforce the demand under the normal provisions of the Act without computing the book profit. In our view, since i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that will not render assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. 7. While assuming jurisdiction u/s 263, ld. CIT has to examine the error and prejudice caused to revenue by virtue of assessment order on the basis of the facts and materials on record as on the date of completion of assessment. He cannot take into consideration any event subsequent thereto. As can be seen, ld. CIT upon considering the fact that by virtue of order of ld. CIT(A) passed on 25/03/13 income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version