Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Global Logic India Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle 12 (1) , New Delhi

2015 (6) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI

Transfer pricing adjustment - Transactional Net Margin Method - selection of comparable - Held that:- Infosys Technologies Ltd., cannot be treated as comparable with the assessee company considering the giantness of Infosys Ltd., in terms of risk profile, nature of services, number of employees, ownership of branded products and brand related profits, etc. See CIT vs. Agnity India Technologies (P) Ltd. 2013 (7) TMI 696 - DELHI HIGH COURT

KALS Information Systems Ltd. (seg.) company is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng in the case of this company, the impact of the profit from the sale/licence of software products on the overall profitability of the ‘Application software’ segment cannot be segregated. To what extent the overall profits of this company have been influenced by the revenues from software products, cannot be precisely ascertained. In view of the aforegoing distinguishing facts, this company ceases to be comparable.

Persistent Systems Ltd. has been held to be functionally different fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its own cannot be compared with a company which provides software development services by using its own IPRS in the form of patents of software. Under such circumstances, we hold that this company cannot be considered as comparable at segment level. The same is ex consequenti directed to expelled from the set of comparables. - ITA No.122/Del/2013 - Dated:- 4-6-2015 - SHRI R.S. SYAL AND SHRI C.M. GARG, JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate, Shri Neeraj Jain, Advocate, Sh. Abhis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment amounting to ₹ 12,82,48,777/-. 3. Succinctly, the assessee is an Indian company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Logic, US. It is engaged mainly in the provision of software development services to its overseas group companies. The assessee reported two international transactions as per its Audit Report in Form No.3CEB. The entire controversy in this appeal is restricted to the international transaction of Provision of software development services with the transacted value of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I) of Operating Profit/Total Cost (OP/TC). The assessee selected 23 companies as comparable. The mean margin of such comparables, on the basis of current/multiple-years data was computed at 14.84%. As the assessee s OP/TC stood at 12.47%, it was claimed that the international transactions were at ALP. The TPO shortlisted 19 companies as comparable and computed the arithmetical mean of their PLI at 24.82%, after allowing working capital adjustment of 1.38%. In such calculation, the TPO used curre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee is aggrieved against this addition made towards transfer pricing adjustment. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. The assessee has accepted all the aspects of the transfer pricing analysis carried out by the TPO except the inclusion of the following companies in the list of comparables:- i. Avani Cincom Technologies ii. Infosys Ltd. iii. Kals Information Systems Ltd. (Seg.) iv. Persistent Systems Ltd. v. Tata Elxsi (Seg.) vi. Wipro Ltd (Seg. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

study report, a copy of which is available on pages 40 onwards of the paper book, we find some further elaboration of the nature of activity done under the international transaction of Provision of software development services. Page 21 of the TP study report indicates that the assessee renders software development services to its associated enterprises (AEs) and gets remunerated on a cost plus mark-up basis for these services. There is a narration of Functions performed in para 4.02.2 of the T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing staff initiates contact directly with a potential client. Thereafter, Global Logic Inc prepares and submits a proposal to the client, irrespective of whether the client lead is provided by GIPL or GlobalLogic Inc., giving the scope and the technical aspects of the project. Bid costs are borne by GlobalLogic Inc. Hence, though primary responsibility for identification of customers and marketing the GlobalLogic Groups services lies with GlobalLogic Inc., GIPL also undertakes marketing function .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

& Quality Control The last step involves testing the software that has been developed. GIPL has the responsibility of testing the software. GIPL has quality control departments which adopts the quality control procedures at par with the industry. This department is inter alia involved in process improvisations, making of new processes, quality audits, customer surveys, etc. Project Management GIPL is responsible for ensuring timely delivery of the software developed by it under the contract. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

projects sub-contracted to it by GlobalLogic Inc. Such developed software are to be tested by the assessee. The Testing department of the assessee, apart from testing the software developed by it, also undertakes process improvisations, making of new processes, quality audits. After developing and testing a software, the assessee is required to ensure that such developed software are timely delivered. Apart from rendering the above software development and maintenance services, the assessee is a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d maintenance services but also Marketing and Administrative support services to its AEs. 7. When we peruse the Agreement dated 10.11.2006 effective from 1.4.2006 between the assessee and GlobalLogic Inc. under which the assessee was assigned the task of rendering Software Development and other Allied Services , it transpires that Clause 1 of the Agreement containing - Scope of Work - stipulates that the assessee shall carry out Software Development; Maintenance and Repair Work; Technical Testin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reated the entire amount under this international transaction as consideration for rendering Software development services and benchmarked it accordingly, without separately taking cognizance of any Marketing and Administrative services, we leave this issue here only and do not propose to start everything afresh by setting up an altogether new case. It is for the TPO to analyze the functions performed in proper perspective and in the light of the material available on record and then reach a pos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Provision of software development services . The appeal filed by the assessee for such year in ITA No.580/Del/2011 has since been disposed of by the tribunal vide its order dated 22.1.2015, a copy of which is available on record. It can be noticed from such Tribunal order that the TPO treated similar international transaction, as has also been transacted for the instant year, as Provision of software development services . Such services have been provided to the AEs, both in the preceding yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

seeking certain information from the company u/s 133(6) of the Act, the TPO prima facie formed the view about the comparability of this company. On being called upon to show cause as to why this company be not considered as comparable, the assessee submitted that data of this company for the year in question was not available in the public domain and, also it was functionally different. Rejecting the assessee s contention, the TPO treated this company as comparable. The assessee remained unsucc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndering such services. Relying on the order passed by the Tribunal in the case of Motorola Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. VS. ACIT (2015) 152 ITD 0158 (Delhi), the Tribunal ordered for the exclusion of this company from the list of comparables. In reaching this conclusion, the Tribunal also observed that apart from rendering software development services, this company was also engaged in the sale of software products and the accounts maintained by it were at entity level without there being any segre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spectfully following the view taken by the Tribunal in the assessee s own case for the immediately preceding year, we order for the exclusion of this company from the list of comparables. Infosys Technologies Ltd. 11. The TPO noticed that this company was finding place in the accept/reject matrix but was rejected in the TP documentation by claiming that it failed functional area comparability. The TPO found this company to be into software development services qualifying all the filters applied .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y rejecting the assessee s contention about the brand of this company helping in earning huge profits and also the brand-related products swelling the ultimate profit rate of this company. We find that the assessee is a captive unit rendering services to its AE alone without acquiring any intellectual property rights in the work done by it in the development of software. The Hon ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Agnity India Technologies (P) Ltd. (2013) 219 Taxmann 26 (Del) considered the giantnes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

India Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The facts of the instant case are more or less similar inasmuch as the extant assessee is also a captive service provider with a limited number of employees at its disposal and also not owning any branded products with no expenditure on R&D etc. When we consider all the above factors in a holistic manner, there remains absolutely no doubt in our mind that Infosys Technologies Ltd. is incomparable with the assessee company. Respectfully following the judgment of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity was into two segments, namely, (i) Software development services; and (ii) Training. By considering the data available before him, the TPO included the Software development services segment into the list of comparables. The assessee is aggrieved the inclusion of this company on segmental level. 14. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. We have also gone through the Annual report of this company which is available on pages 349 onwards of the paper bo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s its revenues primarily from software services and software products. Since this company is into the business of software products and also software development and has merged the revenue from both the streams under the overall segment of Application software , which has been taken by the TPO for inclusion in the final set of comparables, this company loses the tag of comparability vis-a-vis the assessee company which is exclusively engaged in providing software development services on a contra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parable. We order for the exclusion of this company from the list of comparables. Persistent Systems Ltd. 15. This company was originally selected by the assessee in its TP study. However, it was contended before the TPO that it is a product company and because of lack of segmental data, the same cannot be considered as comparable. The TPO, after seeking information u/s 133(6) of the Act from this company, observed that 96% of its total operating revenues from Software development services are f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ry events, such as, merger or acquisition, etc. There are no such extraordinary events in the current year. However, we find from the Annual report of this company, that it is a software product company which is apparent from page 383 of the Paper book. It has been mentioned that it : is different from most of the outsourcing firms because we are focused exclusively on the software product development. The same thing has been mentioned on page 388 of the paper book that Persistent Systems Ltd. : .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es segment, which has not been controverted by the ld. DR with any cogent material. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in 3DPLM Software Solutions Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.1303/Bang./2012 vide its order dated 28.11.2013, for the identical assessment year, i.e., 2008-09, has held Persistent Systems Ltd., to be a company engaged in product development and product design services and hence functionally different from a software development services provider. Similar view has been taken in FCG Softwar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dered as comparable with the assessee company. The same is, therefore, directed to be excluded. Tata Elxsi (Seg.) 17. This company was rejected by the assessee in its TP documents by claiming it to be functionally different . The TPO observed from the Annual report of this company that it has two segments, namely, Software development and services segment and Systems integration and support segment. Noticing the segmental details, the TPO considered Software development and service segment as co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h a focus on industrial design) and Animation and Visual Effects. Since this company offers integrated hardware and packaged software solutions, the same cannot be considered as comparable with the assessee company, which is simply providing software related services. The Tribunal in Toluna India Pvt. Ltd. VS. ACIT (2014) 151 ITD 177 (Delhi) and Motorola Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), both of which were rendering software development services, has treated this company as functionally not com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

failed to persuade the DRP to fall in line with its reasoning for the exclusion of this company from the final set of comparables. That is how, the assessee is before us. 20. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. It is noticed that the TPO has taken Software development segment of this company on standalone basis. We agree with the TPO that super normal profits or very high turnover cannot be criterion for treating an otherwise functionally comparable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version