Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT Circle-30 (1) New Delhi Versus Delhi State Co-Operative Bank Ltd

Disallowance of deduction of premium written off on Govt. Securities - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- The assessee invests in Govt. Securities and other financial documents as other co-operative banks as per the guidelines of the RBI and so as per the RBI Master Circular No.DBOD.BP.BC.13/21.04.141/2012-13 dated July 2,2012, containing consolidated instructions/guidelines issued to banks till June 30, 2012, on matters relating to prudential norms for classification, valuation and opera .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Y HIGH COURT ) it was held that discount on bonds and premiums on redemptions of debentures are allowable as expense proportionately spread over the period of security. So therefore we are of the considered view that this issue needs to be remanded back to the file of the AO to verify whether the assessee has claimed the expenses proportionately i.e. the premium amount which is in addition to the face value proportionately spread over the life of security and if it is so computed and claimed it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amended by Finance Act, 2007, with effect from 01.04.2007, by which the words "or a cooperative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank" were inserted. This amendment is applicable to assessment year 2007-08 onwards and for the year under consideration. Accordingly, it applies to the case of the assessee for this year. We find that this issue has not been adjudicated on merits by the AO. Therefore, we think it fit to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the mercantile system of accounting only and accordingly, the addition was rightly deleted by the CIT(A). - Decided against revenue. - ITA No. 2537/Del/2012 - Dated:- 27-3-2015 - R S Syal, AM And A T Varkey, JM,JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri J P Chandrakar, Sr.DR For the Respondent : Shri S L Gupta, CA ORDER Per A T Varkey, Judicial Member The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order dated 29/3/2012 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXV, New Delhi for Assessme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO to examine the assessee's claim u/s. 36(1)(viia) obliterating the verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetze India (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT (2006) 284 ITR 323 (SC) which mandates that AO cannot entertain assessee's claim at the assessment stage which is not made through filing of revised return. 3. Whether such direction by the Ld. CIT(A) in the order disposing off appeal does not tantamount setting aside the issue which is not envisaged in sec. 250(4) after 1.6.2001. 4. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed in this case on 28.9.2008 and the same was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after 'the Act') on 31.3.2010. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS on random basis. Statutory notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, dated 16.9.2009 was issued and duly served upon the assessee. In compliance thereof, various details were submitted from time to time before the AO during assessment proceedings and books of accounts were examined on random test check basis by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) and uphold the order of the AO. 5. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel of the assessee has relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and does not want us to interfere in the impugned order. 6. We have heard both the parties and considered the relevant record available before us. We find that the facts as stated by the ld CIT(A) is that the assessee is a Co-operative Society and was claiming deduction U/S 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act up to AY 2006-07 @100%. The assessee makes investments and buys the gover .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a revenue expenditure or is written off. The AO has disallowed the premium expenditure / write off of ₹ 1,43,13,391/- on the ground that the same is a capital expenditure or the same is not an allowable expenditure under the Act vide the order of the AO. We find that assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) has submitted that the AO is not justified to disallow the genuine premium expenditure which is a business expenditure and the same is allowable as the same is for the purpose of business. It was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

following the same accounting policy since long. The Ld. Assessing Officer stated in his order that premium paid is an expense for purchase of securities at premium, and securities are not business assets of the assessee and shown as investment instead of stock in trade, which according to the assessee is not true. We find that Assessing Officer further stated that by following the consistent accounting policies the appellant is carrying an illegal and wrong act but failed to establish how the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lus (funds which are not immediately required) business funds in securities/ loans/ bonds/advances. Ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee invests in Govt. Securities and other financial documents as other commercial/Co-operative banks as per the guidelines of the RBI. In case of investments/securities purchased on premium, the total premium paid is allocated/ distributed equally to the remaining period of security, as the higher rate of interest is being received for those year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ser/ assessee will take the benefit in future by receiving extra interest. According to the ld AR, higher interest received by the appellant in a particular period is compensated /matched with the higher interest premium paid at the time of purchase of security, by writing off proportionate premium paid over the remaining period of security. So, according to the ld AR, on maturity of Govt. Security, it is only the face value on which security is redeemed and not at the premium/discount prevailin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

face value, in which case the premium should be amortized over the period remaining to maturity. The book value of the security should continue to be reduced to the extent of the amount amortized during the relevant accounting period. The ld AR took our attention to the observation of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd. (ITA No. 552/2005, 565/2005, 1191/2007, 139/2008,466/2008 & 537/2008, wherein it was observed as under:- "Under the Income T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ncome Tax Act unless such losses/ expenses are expressly or by necessary implication disallowed by the act." 6.1 Ld. Counsel of the assessee further brought to our notice that the Assessing Officer have accepted the same accounting policy in the past and never objected for the same. And generally Income of the assessee was assessed u/s 143(3) of the Act by the Ld. Assessing Officer without any reference to change in accounting policy. 6.2 We find that the assessee invests in Govt. Securitie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on cost, unless it is more than the face value, in which case the premium should be amortized over the period remaining to maturity. The book value of the security should continue to be reduced to the extent of the amount amortized during the relevant accounting period. And as held in the case of CIT Vs. Himachal Finance Corporation (2010) 186 Taxmann 2005 (H.P.) and Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd. (2010) 38 DTR 313 (Bombay) it was held that discount on bonds and premiums on redemptions of debe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to deletion of addition of ₹ 2,46,73,078/- under the head deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) is concerned, we find that assessee is a Co-operative Society and was claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act up to A Y 2006-07 @ 100%. This benefit has been withdrawn in the case of urban Co-operative Society after A Y 2006-07 as provided u/s 80P( 4) as per the Finance Act, 2006. Since the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) has been withdrawn in the case of urban Co-operative societies, similar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bad debt (N.P.) while filing the return. The assessee had filed the return income of ₹ 30,43,17,299/- on 31/03/2010. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee detected the mistake and filed a revised computation claiming the deduction of ₹ 2,46,73,078/- which is allowable u/s 36(1)(viia) @ 7.5% of the total NP. The AO has disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that filing time for revised return has expired u/s 139(5) and the assessee was not entitled to m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mended/new provisions and there was a bona fide mistake in not being able to make the correct claim of deduction in the original return. It was submitted by the ld AR that the AO is also duty bound to allow the genuine claim of the assessee as per the Board Circular No. 14 (XL-35) dated 11104/2005 & F.No. 81127/65-IT(B) dated 18/0511965 which states that the AO should not take advantage of the ignorance of the assessee and the AO should not act against the assessee in securing the genuine re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ge-45, [2007] 15 SOT 252 (Mum) - Emerson Network Power India P Ltd Vs ACIT, [2009] 122 TTJ 67 (ITAT Mum) 7.2 We find that the assessee has made the provisions of ₹ 3,66,33,543/- for bad and doubtful debts in its Profit & Loss A/c but by mistake while submitting the return the same was taken as ₹ 1,35,28,498/- instead of ₹ 3,66,33,543/-. We find that section 36(1)(viia) was amended by Finance Act, 2007, with effect from 01.04.2007, by which the words "or a cooperative b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

u/s 36(1)(viia) on merits. This ground is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 8. With regard to deletion of addition of ₹ 4,08,38,822/- made by AO on account of accrued interest on NPA is concerned, we find that the assessee has not declared the interest income amounting to ₹ 4,08,38,822/- as interest income from the NPA (Non-performing assets), since the loans have become bad. According to the AO, the assessee has neither received the loan amount nor the interest income and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The ld DR relied on the order of the AO and want us to reverse the order of the ld CIT(A). On the other hand the AR submitted that the AO was not justified to make the addition as the loan has become bad (NPA); and the assessee has not received the interest income and as such no real income has accrued to the assessee. According to him, in the case of interest on NPAs, the party account is debited and the interest account is credited in the P&L account and since the interest is actually not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e the same will be accounted for and offered as income of the assessee. Further it was submitted that only the real income of the assessee may be taxed and not the notional income. The AR further submitted that no interest would be set to have accrued on the loans of doubtful recovery and the AR relied on various case laws which are as under:- (1) CIT V Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co, 46 ITR 144 (SC) [1962] (2) CIT Vs Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd, 330 ITR 440 (Delhi), 2011 (3) DIT Vs Brahmaputra Capital .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and borrower is not paying, income from interest on such accounts should not be credited to its profit and loss account. The assessee is adopting the same accounting policies since long, so interest accrued on bad & doubtful loans cannot be considered its income. Where the chances of realization of principal by the appellant from its customers were far from remote even before the event of accrual of interest taking place, the question of treating the interest on such NPA loans on accrual ba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uls 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 without any reference to change in accounting policy. 8.2 We find that the Ld. CIT(A) has observed that the assessee has not received the income as the loan amount itself has become bad and as such the AO is not justified to treat the notional interest as income of the assessee. A perusal of the case laws cited by the assessee also supports the case of the assessee that only the real income is taxable and not the hypothetical income in view of the real incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the managed companies of a portion of income which had already accrued, but an agreement to receive a lesser remuneration that what had been agreed upon. The assessee had in fact received only the lesser amount in spite of the entries in the account books, and this lesser amount alone was taxable. Income tax is a levy on income. Though the Income Tax Act takes into account two points of time at which the liability to tax is attracted viz., the accrual of the income or its receipt, yet the su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income, even though an entry to that effect might, in certain circumstances, have been made in the books of account. Decision of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co. [1959] 36 I.T.R. 25 affirmed. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Chamanlal Mangaldas & Co. [1960] 39 I.T.R. 8 (S.C.) followed." 8.3 In the case of CIT V Motor Credit Co P Ltd, 127 ITR 572 (Mad) [1981] that only the real income is to be taxed and the head-note of the case reads as u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version