Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, CC-18, New Delhi Versus Shri Anil Dhingra

Undisclosed investment - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Appellant had sufficient amount of cash available as per the cash book so as to enable to him to make the investment of the above amounts. Regarding the objection of the AO, that the cash withdrawn might have been spent by the appellant somewhere else and there was no chance of the appellant having cash in hand with him sufficient enough to make cash deposits with the bank from which the investment has been made by the appellant, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is find that there was sufficient balance in the cash account on 5/1/05 from which the cash deposit of ₹ 35,000/-could have been made. The AO has no material to justify his suspicion that earlier cash withdrawals from bank have been spent or invested by the appellant somewhere else, and in the absence of such material, no adverse view can be taken against the appellant. Therefore allow this ground of appeal and delete the addition for ₹ 10 lakhs. - Decided against revenue.

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the AO has accepted the source of this being out of 3 months' rent @ ₹ 35,0001- per month collected and credited in bank account of appellant wherein his wife Mrs. Rita Dhingra was a joint holder of account and also this rent has been declared by the appellant in his return of income for A.Y. 2005-06. Accordingly, the entire addition for ₹ 11,05,000/- being explained is directed to be deleted. - Decided against revenue.

Disallowance of drawing for personal expenses - CIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8377; 1,07,4711-; mediclaim insurance for ₹ 17,995/- and Travel Insurance for ₹ 4055/-. All these payments have been made through cheques from the Account of G&J Apparels and are, therefore, explained. Therefore AO is directed to delete the addition - Decided against revenue.

Addition to unexplained cash credits - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- AO has not considered the cash withdrawals of ₹ 1,89,000/- which he himself has taken in para-vii of the remand r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R Per T S Kapoor, AM. This is an appeal filed by Revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A) dated 02.05.2011. The grounds of appeal taken by Revenue are as under: "1. On the fact and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law and in facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 6,63,300/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed investment. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onal expenses. 5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,44,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on count of unexplained cash credits. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in admitting additional evidences under rule 46A? 7. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous and is not tenable on facts and in law." 2. Ld. D.R. at the outset invited our at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m the A.O. and the A.O. in his remand report has communicated merits of addition and Ld. CIT(A) after taking into account the objection of the A.O. in remand report has accepted the contention of assessee and has thereby given relief and therefore, there was no violation of Rule 46A. Ld. A.R. invited our attention to various findings of Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that each and every addition made by A.O. were explained and therefore, Ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the additions. In respect of grou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on record. We find that Ld. CIT(A) has allowed relief to the assessee on various additions after obtaining remand report and after discussing the objections of A.O. on merits. Therefore, there is no relation of provisions of Rule 46A, therefore, ground No.6 taken by Revenue is dismissed. As regards merits for deletions made by Ld. CIT(A), he has deleted the same by holding as under:: "5.3 Finding on Ground No. 3: I have considered the observation of the AO in the order of assessment, submis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le to the explanation regarding the source of investment for ₹ 4,37,000/- and therefore effectively only the addition of ₹ 30,000/- and ₹ 1,96,300/- has to be considered in the present appeal. I have gone through the cash account furnished by the appellant in the paper book and I find that the appellant had sufficient amount of cash available as per the cash book so as to enable to him to make the investment of the above amounts. Regarding the objection of the AO, that the cash .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her activities, I allow a relief of ₹ 6,63,300/-." 6.3 Finding on Ground No.4. I have considered the entire material available in the form of observation in the assessment order and the submissions of the appellant and the remand report and rejoinder of the appellant thereon. From the brief discussion in the assessment order, I find that the only reason given by the AO is that FDR is not reflected in the statement of affairs of the appellant as on 31/3/05. I find that in the next grou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppearing in the statement of affairs of the appellant on 31/3/07. Further, coming to the source of the FDR, the AO has only objected to the source to the extent of ₹ 35,000/- only, which is the cash deposit made by the appellant in the bank account on 5/1/05. I have verified the cash account of the appellant and from the perusal of the cash account, I find <that there was sufficient balance in the cash account on 5/1/05 from which the cash deposit of ₹ 35,000/-could have been made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 35,000/-, as the balance amount was received through Bank transfers from A/c of G&J Apparels, the proprietary concern of Mrs. Rita Dhingra, the details of which have been placed on record. 7.2 Finding in Ground No. 5. I have considered the submissions and the contentions raised. It is clear that the AO has in the remand report contested the addition of ₹ 10,00,000/- out of ₹ 11,05,000/- made by him for the loan/advance made to Mrs. Rita Dhingra. The confirmation of Mrs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ingra, the loan transaction consists of credit of FDR of ₹ 10,00,000/- and source of above FDR has already been considered by the AO in para 2 of the impugned order and therefore, there is nothing which remains unexplained as far as purchase of FDR is concerned. The loan transaction, as entered into between the parties, is to be verified with reference to the question whether this transaction of loan involves transfer of funds which needs to be explained. In this case, there is nothing whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngly, the entire addition for ₹ 11,05,000/- being explained is directed to be deleted. 8.4 Findings on Ground No.6. I have carefully examined the AO's observation in the order under appeal, the remand report and the submission of the appellant including the submission made in the rejoinder and after considering the same, I find that the premium of A viva Life Insurance policy of ₹ 5,00,000/- was paid on 7/1/7/04 through cheque no. 590801 encashed on 29/7/04 reference paper book p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated 23/6/04 of ₹ 5 lakhs is not correct as the said credit entry is independent of the above transaction against the opening outstanding debit balance of ₹ 21, 12,719.15 as on 114/04. So far as the payment of the premium is concerned, there is absolutely no doubt about the source of above expenditure. The AO has raised doubt about the source of the cheque of ₹ 5 lakhs on 23/6/04 and I have verified that the appellant on 23/6/04 has deposited cash of ₹ 5 lakhs in the bank .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lanation of the appellant and I find that the AO is not correct in assuming that all expenses of personal contingencies aggregating ₹ 1,23,000/- are incurred in cash and therefore, on that basis, he has found that the same is not accounted for in the cash flow statement and the cash account of the appellant. From the cash flow statement of the appellant at page 25 of the paper book, it is evident that there is a cash withdrawal of ₹ 45,000/- for personal expenses and the difference o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version