Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Thirumurugan Enterprises Versus The Additional Commissioner of Central Excise

2015 (6) TMI 473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Application to move to the settlement Commissioner - Demand of duty and interest - Held that:- Petitioner admitting their tax liability, has also paid a sum of ₹ 14,57,464/= towards service tax and ₹ 9,70,000/= towards interest. Therefore .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid the tax liability alongwith interest as mentioned above, is of the view that this is a fit case to find out whether they should be allowed to settle and redress his grievance before the Settlement Commissioner. - Decided in favour of assessee. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n original No.123/2014, dated 20.11.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner demanding a sum of ₹ 22,60,399/- towards service tax including Education Cess and Higher Education Cess for the year 2008-09 to 2011-12 under section 73(2) of the Fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the impugned order dated 20.11.2014, has moved a petition dated 03.11.2014 admitting the liability of the petitioner to pay entire tax liability alongwith the interest on the premise that the they would be allowed to go before the Settlement Commissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f Central Excise that the petitioner was prepared to pay the tax liability along with interest and subsequently a sum of ₹ 75,743/=, ₹ 9869/=, ₹ 13,71,852/= on 1.12.2014, 12.12.2014 and 27.12.2014 respectively were paid by way of ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se facts would go to show that the petitioner is not disputing the tax liability, accordingly, it is pleaded that it is a fit case where the respondent ought to have allowed the request made on 03.11.2014 to approach Settlement Commissioner. As he di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment Commissioner, no prejudice, whatsover, would cause to anyone. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that since the petitioner has invited the impugned order, the question of directing them to approach the Settlement Commissioner does n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version