GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 509 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (6) TMI 509 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Extension of stay order - Extension of the further period of 365 days - Held that:- Perusal of Section 35C (2A) clearly reveals that the said sub-section did not grant any power to grant stay; it only sought to put fetters on the power of the Tribunal to grant stay beyond a certain period. Consequently its abolition can only have an effect that fetters which the said sub-section sought to place on the Tribunal with regard to the duration beyond which C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ses where appellant was ready and willing to pursue the appeal, but the Tribunal owing to the older pendency was unable to take up the appeal. - Stay extended. - Application No.ST/MISC/50093/2015-CU[DB], Appeal No.ST/56346/2013-CU[DB] - Dated:- 14-5-2015 - Ashok Jindal, Member (J) And R K Singh, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri B L Narasimhan & Shri Manish Gaur, Advs. For the Respondent : Shri Govind Dixit, DR ORDER Per: R K Singh: The Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he ld. Departmental Representative. The power to grant stay has not been expressly provided in the Statute. However, power to grant stay is an inherent power as has been held in the case of Shri Ram Narayan Dyg. & Ptg. Mills Vs. CCE, Surat-I [2010 (262) ELT 526 (Tri. - Ahd.)] This inherent power to grant stay has been expressly recognised even by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as is evident from para 6 of the judgement in the case of CCE, Chandigarh Vs. Baldev Raj Ram Murthi [2005 (187) ELT 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll reasonable means to make such grant effective. The Supreme Court, in the case of Union of India v. Paras Laminates (P) Ltd., reported in 1990 (49) E.L.T. 322 (S.C.) has held that the Tribunal functions as a court within the limits of its jurisdiction and being a judicial body, it has all those incidental and ancillary powers which are necessary to make fully effective the express grant of statutory powers. It was held in paragraph 8 of the judgment that, certain powers, are recognised as inci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) it was and continues to be an inherent power of the Tribunal. As regards the contention of the ld. Departmental Representative that with the abolition of Section 35C(2A) ibid the power of CESTAT to extend stay stands eclipsed, we would like to peruse the said section, which is reproduced below:- "35C (2A) The Appellate Tribunal shall, where it is possible to do so, hear and decide every appeal within a period of three years from the date on which such appeal is filed: Provided that where .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version