Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Subhaschandra Balchandra Badjate Versus The Director General, Central Excise (Intelligence) , And Others

Validity of arrest of Petitioner - Held that:- Summons was served on the petitioner and he was called to Pune to appear before the empowered officer. He failed to comply with this summons. Authorization of arrest was then given. It is submitted for the Department that Excise Officer empowered to arrest person like the petitioner was at Pune and so the petitioner was taken to Pune. Admittedly the petitioner was produced before the Magistrate from Pune by such empowered officer and within the pres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

produced the petitioner before the Magistrate of Pune and within the prescribed period. There is provision in the Act like section 22 taking care of search, seizure etc. Thus no relief as claimed by the petitioner can be given in the present case. - Decided against assessee. - Criminal Writ Petition No. 1158 of 2013 - Dated:- 15-4-2015 - T. V. Nalawade And I. K. Jain,JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri R R Mantri, Adv. For the Respondent : Dr. (Smt.) Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Adv. and Shri B L Dh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity shares of one private company by name "M/s Rutuja Ispat Private Limited Company situated at Jalna, Maharashtra". Shri. Shailesh Badjate and Shri. Sushil Badjate, two sons of the present petitioner, are the Directors of the company and on the record they are conducting the business of this company. The petitioner and his two sons are living in the same premises situated in Jalna where the office of the company is also situated. 3. There was specific information to the officers of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as not accounted in the returns, a separate record was prepared about the unaccounted manufacture, sale etc. of the aforesaid product and that record was available in the pen-drive and in the computer of the petitioner and his sons. 4. The officers of the Directorate General of the Central Excise and also the officers of Pune and Nasik Commissionorates took action and search of the premises by name "Shreyas", Ahimsa Marg, near Jain Temple Jalna was taken. The premises was being used by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso incriminating material came to be recovered. 5. It revealed during investigation that during the period 1-1-2009 to 7-3-2011 this company had manufacture MS/TNT bars valued more than ₹ 140 crore but this company had submitted returns to the Central Excise Department of the goods manufactured worth ₹ 26.16 crore. Meagre amount of Excise duty on this quantity of goods is paid. The record with regard to raw material purchased by the company, which was also unaccounted, was also foun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ank. 7. During investigation, the statements of employees of the factory are recorded. There is statement of person like Accountant, Prashant Jadhav and the statement shows that as per the instructions given by Sushil, he had maintained separate record of unaccounted purchase of raw material and unaccounted manufacture and sale of finished material. The statement reveals that separate electronic record was created in respect of these concealed transactions. Statement of Prashant shows that no Ce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

employees to the effect that they used to hand over cash directly to the present petitioner also. 9. Shailesh, aforesaid Director contended that Sushil was maintaining record. He showed readiness to pay Excise Duty if there was short payment. The company was formed in the year 2004 and Shailesh was Director of this company right from beginning. Sushil became Director from 2005-06. 10. The officers drew panchanama in presence of panch witnesses and the aforesaid material came to be seized. This p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed are recorded and the statements of the persons, concerns to whom the unaccounted finished material was sold are also recorded. They are compared with the aforesaid electronic data. These statements and record seized is in conformity with the case of the Department that there were unaccounted transactions. 12. The statements of the employees of the factory and the record collected by the Department show that benami accounts were opened in banks by the petitioner and his sons in the names of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2 lakh was deposited and the pass book and the cheque book of this account were kept with Sushil or with the present petitioner. Similarly, in the name of another employee, Jadhav, amount of ₹ 33.99 lakh was deposited in the bank. His statement shows that he had withdrawn amounts from the bank and he used to hand over the amounts to the present petitioner. Thus amount of more than one crore rupees was deposited by the petitioner and his sons in the accounts of their employees and Benami re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and Sushil by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Even the Sessions Court refused the bail to them. This Court at Principal Seat granted bail to Sushil and Shailesh subject to following conditions:- (a) that they shall not transfer the property of the factory viz Gat No.199/3 of Jalna until adjudication proceeding is completed and liability towards duty and penalty is discharged; (b) They are to give undertaking and security by producing title deed in respect of payment of the duty. Similar undertaki .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ods was shown as ₹ 132.71 crores but after making further inquiry it was ascertained that the value of manufactures goods was ₹ 143 crores and most of the goods were cleared without making payment of Duty. There is allegation that the Duty of more than ₹ 15.75 crore is not paid. In respect of shortage of the goods there will be charge of Excuse Duty of more than ₹ 11 lakh, there will be penalty which can be recovered under Rules 25 and 26. In the show cause notice it is m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rrest memo was served on 16-8-2011 and he came to be taken in custody at 1.30 hours at Jalna. 17. This Court is considering the contentions made with regard to various reliefs claimed one by one. Petitioner has claimed declaration that he is not liable to aforesaid activities of the private company as he was simply a share holder. It is his case that amount of ₹ 45 lakh taken over from him is not liable to confiscation as it is not the amount of the factory. It is his contention that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t as provided under section 12 of the Central Excise Act, Central Government has declared that provisions of Sections 105 (1), 110, 115 (excluding clauses (a) and (e) of sub-section (1)), clause (a) of section 118, sections 119, 120, 121 and 124, clause (b) and sub clause (ii) of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 142 and section 150 of the Customs Act shall apply to the matters specified therein for like matters provided under the Central Excise Act. Those provisions are to apply subject .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gled" shall be read as goods sought to be removed for evasion of Excise Duty. 19. In view of aforesaid notification and the sections of Excise Act, one needs to keep in mind the provisions of the Customs Act mentioned in the Notification. Provision of section 105(1) of the Customs Act is with regard to the powers of search given to the officers specially empowered. This provision shows that the officer who is authorized and who has reason to believe that any goods, are liable to confiscatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tioned in section 105. 20. The provision of section 110(2) of the Customs Act shows that when the goods are seized under sub section (1) of section 110 and notice in respect of such goods is not given, under clause (a) of section 124 of Customs Act within six months from the date of seizure, the goods shall be returned to the person from whose possession they were seized. This period can be extended by six more months after following procedure laid down for that purpose. Provision of section 110 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r to prove that he had no knowledge that his conveyance was being used for carrying the goods in respect of which the offence under the Act is committed. There are provisions with regard to confiscation of package in which goods were found and also confiscate other goods which were used for concealing such goods etc but they need no consideration in the present matter. 22. Provision of Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962 reads as under: "121. Confiscation of sale-proceeds of smuggled goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nst the proposed confiscation and imposition of penalty. Reasonable opportunity of hearing is also expected in such a proceeding. However if the person concerned requests, oral representation can also be accepted. 24. The provision of Section 142(b), clause (ii) of clause (c) of the Customs Act shows that there is power to the officers to distrain goods until amount payable is paid. 25. The aforesaid provisions are made applicable for implementation of the provisions of the Central Excise Act. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

On the basis of the aforesaid definition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, period of six months given in section 110(2) of the Customs Act is applicable to the sale proceed of excisable goods in respect of which there is evasion of estate duty. He submitted that in view of this definition and provisions of Section 121 of the Customs Act read with sections 110 and 124 of the Customs Act, it was necessary for the Department to give notice within prescribed period of intentio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plicable, it needs to be presumed that the definition of "goods" given in the Customs Act needs to be read into the words "any goods" given in provisions of sections 110 and 124 of the Customs Act. These words further need to be read with following words like "liable to confiscation under this Act". Thus, all those goods which are liable to confiscation under the Act are covered in section 110(2) of the Customs Act. It can be said that in section 2(22) of the Custom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ace of "smuggled goods" the words "excisable goods" which have been removed or sought to be removed in contravention of any of the provisions of the Central Excise Act and the Rules" are to be read. (iii) Provisions of Sections 118, 119 and 120 of the Customs Act are made applicable. They show that packages and other goods used for evasion of customs duty on the goods involved are also liable to confiscation. Particularly when the provision of Section 121 shows that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reported cases:- (1) 1983 (14) E.L.T. 1715 (Del.) (Shantilal Mehta v. Union of India; (2) 1982 (10) E.L.T. 273 (Bom.) (Dhirajlal Amritlal Mehta v. Union of India); (3) 1987 (31) E.L.T. 30 (Cal.) (D. Sengupta v. Collector of Customs); and, (4) 1996 (81) E.L.T. 483 (All.) (Krishna Gopal Chander v. Union of India). 28. Though the aforesaid position of law is in favour of the petitioner, the other circumstances of the present case cannot be ignored. The relevant material is already discussed and it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bility of payment of duty, penalty and also interest is to be fixed. There are more provisions in the Central Excise Act like provisions of sections 110 and 110-A. While considering the claim of the petitioner in such a case these provisions need to be kept in mind. Circumstance of fraud mentioned in section 11-A (4) of the Central Excise Act is prima facie made out in the present matter. There is prima facie case for evasion of estate duty and also non payment of income tax on the income made b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

artment also. When such matter comes before Court it is also duty of the Court to see that the Income Tax Department is heard in such a case and intimation of the incident is given to the Income Tax Department also. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that the amount cannot be returned to the petitioner. Returning of the amount will amount to virtually disposing of the property which can also be attached under the aforesaid provisions. This Court has no hesitation to hold that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business and he was collecting money, sale proceeds in respect of the excisable goods. He was actively involved in evasion of the excise duty. Thus the proceeding of confiscation and imposition of penalty can go on against him. The learned counsel for the Department has placed reliance on the following cases reported as Polar Mar (2) AIR 2004 SC 3328 (Commissioner of Customs v. M/s Charminar Nonwovens Ltd.). 30. The submission for the present petitioner that his arrest was illegal and the offen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allegation of the Department. When a case is filed in Criminal Court, the Court has also power to forfeit such amount and that can be seen in the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also section 110 of the Central Excise Act. The learned counsel for the Department has placed reliance on a case of Rajasthan High Court reported as (2006) 202 CTR Raj 231 (Harvest Gold Food (India) Pvt. v. Union of India). 31. The provision of Section 13 of the Central Excise Act shows that there is a p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 18 gives procedure for such an arrest. Provision of Section 19 of this Act runs as under:- "19. Disposal of persons arrested.- Every person arrested under this Act shall be forwarded without delay to the nearest Central Excise Officer empowered to send persons so arrested to a Magistrate, or, if there is no such Central Excise Officer within a reasonable distance, to the officer-in-charge of the nearest police station." 32. In the present case summons was served on the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version