Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (6) TMI 867

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ued whereas refund claim has been required to be entertained within three months from the date of filing of the refund claim. But nothing was done in three months therefore, the argument advanced by the Ld. AR that appellant has not supplied required documents is not tenable. - issue is no more res integra wherein it has been held that for delayed refunds, interest is payable after three months fr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and refund claims were sanctioned but transferred to the Consumer Welfare Fund to the tune of ₹ 62,20,506/-. The said order of adjudicating authority was challenged before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals), who also affirmed the order of adjudicating authority. Thereafter, an appeal was filed before this Tribunal and the Tribunal vide order dated 02.05.2012 remanded the matter back to the adjud .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f filing of the refund claim. He further submits that the similar issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of M/s Bazpur Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd. wherein vide Final Order No. A/50269/2015 ST dated 22.01.2015, this Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to claim interest for the period after three months from the date of filing of refund claim till it was sanctioned. In these circ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been issued whereas refund claim has been required to be entertained within three months from the date of filing of the refund claim. But nothing was done in three months therefore, the argument advanced by the Ld. AR that appellant has not supplied required documents is not tenable. Further, I find that the issue has been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates