TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 254X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssment Years 1997-98 and 1998-99 in CIT v/s. Jagdishprasad M. Joshi (2008 (11) TMI 326 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ), we do not see any reason to entertain the proposed question of law. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Notice of Motion No.1231 of 2009, Income Tax Appeal No.639 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 26-6-2015 - M S Sanklecha And N M Jamdar,JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Suresh Kumar For the Resp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Tribunal was right in allowing the appeal of the assessee holding that the interest income earned by the assessee on fixed deposits with the bank and other interest income are eligible for deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act? 6. By the impugned order, the tribunal followed its own order in the case of Respondent-Assessee for the Assessment Years 1997-98 and 1998-99. 7. The Revenue being aggri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stands concluded by an order of this Court in the Revenue's own case for the Assessment Years 1997-98 and 1998-99 in CIT v/s. Jagdishprasad M. Joshi (supra), we do not see any reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 9. It may be pointed out that Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue brings to our notice the decisions of this Court in CIT v/s. Dresser Rand In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
