Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

State of Kerala & Ors. Versus A.P. Mammikutty

2015 (7) TMI 374 - SUPREME COURT

Demand of luxury tax imposed on a building that consists of 13 residential apartments - clubbing of plinth area of more than one residential unit of single owner - Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 - Held that:- The learned Single Judge, as we have reproduced a paragraph hereinbefore, has opined that when the plinth area of any residential apartment is above 278.7 sq. mts., then the authority can demand luxury tax for such apartment or flat. Be it noted, the learned Single Judge has held that even i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by him subject to the cap as envisaged under Section 5A of the Act. If he sells away the entire building then it has to be flat/apartment-wise calculation/computation, for every apartment owner is different than the others. Thus, the plinth area would be different. To clarify further, if a singular person purchases three flats, he will be liable on the basis of aggregate plinth area subject to the cap envisaged under Section 5A of the Act. - CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1640 of 2015 - Dated:- 1-7-2015 - Dip .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hority under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 (for brevity "the Act") imposed luxury tax on the building on the base of Section 5A of the Act vide order dated 1.10.2003 in Ref B4-6435/03 whereby he had measured the plinth area of all the residential apartments and computed the tax treating the same as a singular building. 2. The learned Single Judge opined that the levy of luxury tax of the entire building on the owner was not permissible under the Act, for the scheme is to levy luxur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as disposed of with the direction that Tahsildar would verify the plinth area of each residential apartment and levy luxury tax only for such of the residential apartment plinth area of which was in excess of the limit provided under Section 5A of the Act. The relevant part of the opinion expressed by the learned Single Judge is reproduced below:- "Even though petitioner is the owner of the entire building, luxury tax is leviable only if the plinth area of each residential apartment is in e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ildar on inspection finds that the plinth area of any residential apartment is above 278.7 sq. metres, then he can demand luxury tax for such of the apartment or apartments." 3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 12.06.2008 the State of Kerala and its functionaries preferred writ appeal No. 2150 of 2008. The Division Bench referred to Section 5A of the Act, dictionary clause contained in Section 2, especially, Section 2 (k) and the E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rement of another building to calculate the plinth area would not arise. The conclusion recorded by the Division Bench reads as follows:- "For the purpose of calculating the plinth area, if the intention of the legislature was to adopt the entire Explanation (2) to clause (e) even with reference to proviso to 2(k) there was no need to mention the aggregate area where a building has more than one floor. The very reference to more than one floor of a building would explicitly mean, if read al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

own without reference to the other apartment, the question of taking the measurement of another building to calculate the plinth area would not arise." 4. The singular question that emanates for consideration is whether under the provisions of the Act, the revenue authorities are entitled to levy the demand of luxury tax from the respondent by clubbing the plinth area of the apartments which are 13 in number or the plinth area of the individual apartment should be taken into consideration .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sel for the appellants is that the ownership of all the 13 apartments rests with the respondent himself and the cost of construction having been singularly borne by him, the twin conditions enshrined under the Explanation II are not satisfied, and, therefore, it is impermissible to treat the individual apartments of the building as different buildings. Learned counsel would emphasise that the situation envisaged under Explanation II to Section 2(e) would arise in a situation where the apartments .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion II to Section 2(e) has no application for the levy of luxury tax, for it is only applicable for the purpose of levy of building tax. It is argued by him that levy of luxury tax is only for a residential building and the reference to building in Explanation II in Section 2(e) does not apply to a residential building. Learned counsel has drawn distinction between "residential building" and a "building" by drawing our attention to Section 2(l) of the Act. It is propounded by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missions, it is necessary to extract the relevant part of Section 2(e), which defines "building". It is as under:- " "Building" means a house, out-house, garage or any other structure, or part thereof, whether of masonry, bricks, wood, metal or other material but does not include any portable shelter or any shed constructed principally of mud, bamboos, leaves, grass, thatch or a latrine which is not attached to the main structure. [...] Explanation II: Where a building c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs together: [Emphasis supplied] Provided that in case of a building referred to in the Explanation (2) to clause (e), the plinth area shall be calculated separately." 9. Section 2(l) of the Act that defines "residential building", is as follows:- " residential building' means a building or any other structure or part thereof built exclusively for residential purpose including out-houses or garages appurtenant to the building for the more beneficial enjoyment of the main .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

day of April, 1999. 11. As is evident, the aforesaid provision commences with a non-obstante clause, and, therefore, has to be given primacy over the other provisions of the Act. It clearly provides that luxury tax of ₹ 2,000/- is payable by the owners of all residential buildings constructed on or after 1.4.1999 having plinth area of 278.7 sq.mts. or more. In the instant case, there is no cavil over the fact that the building in question consists of three storeys and has 13 apartments/ f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

13 apartments is taken by applying the method of clubbing or when the plinth area is aggregated, it exceeds 278.7 sq.mts. It is the admitted position that the building has been constructed after 1.4.1999, that is, the date provided in Section 5A of the Act. 12. Section 2(k) of the Act defines the term "plinth area" and Section 2(l) of the Act defines the term "residential building". We have already quoted the aforesaid provisions. As we notice, the term "plinth area&quo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tulated therein that in case of a building when Explanation II to Section 2(e) is attracted, the plinth area should be calculated separately. The issue which requires examination and apposite answer is whether the Explanation II to Section 2 (e) as an ameliorative and beneficial provision, restricts and debars calculation and computations of plinth area of each independent apartment by different owners in a multi-storied building. 13. Having dealt with the concept of plinth area and its applicab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question that has emanated for consideration in this case. The said Explanation lays the stipulation that when a building consists of different apartments or flats owned by different persons and cost of the building has to be met by all such persons, each apartment or flat is deemed to be a separate building. On a dissection of the said provision, it appears that said Explanation would apply when there is a building; that the building must consist of different flats or apartments; that each apa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lding is constructed and there are different owners who have paid the purchase price for their respective apartments. The Explanation should not be read as a negative provision, detrimental and fatal to cases where there are separate owners of the apartments, for that is not the basic object and purpose behind the Explanation II to Section 2(e) of the Act. It is a benevolent and beneficial provision which has not been enacted to curtail and nullify what is logical and apparent to reason. 14. In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

II to Section 2(e) of the Act. Therefore, each residential building owned by single owner would be subjected to luxury tax, if it has the plinth area which exceeds 278.7 sq.mts. It makes no difference whether the residential building consists of one floor or it is two-storied or three-storied or consists of multiple flats or apartments. The entire plinth area in the residential building owned by a singular owner is required to be aggregated. It is noticeable that Section 5A does not refer to agg .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

floor of the building and where building has more than one floor aggregate area included in all the floors are taken together. The proviso to the said definition lays down that in case of a building referred to in the Explanation II to clause (e), the "plinth area" shall be calculated separately. Thus, Section 2(k) has an insegragable nexus with the definition of "building". Explanation II to Section 2(e) which defines "residential building" only conveys about the b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t; of the building. Section 5A also includes "plinth area". Though the term "aggregate" is not mentioned but the words therein are buildings having plinth area and in that context one is required to scan and analyse the meaning of the term "building" and the "plinth area" as defined under Section 2(e) and 2(k) respectively. "Plinth area" as defined clearly provides that when one building has more than one floor, the aggregate area includes all th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

apartments or flats owned by different persons. It also states that the cost of the construction of the building is to be met by all such persons jointly. This Explanation, as noted before, is required to be appositely understood. The learned counsel for the state would submit that if there is initial booking and the persons have contributed for the construction definitely there shall be separate computation. The Explanation II has to be read with Section 5A which starts with a non-obstante clau .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sells the apartments or flats to 10 persons and in that event he ceases to be the owner of the building. The 10 purchasers become the owners of flats and in such a situation it will lead to an absurdity because one single person who once owned the entire building or several apartments, though has ceased to be the owner in law yet is asked to pay the luxury tax solely on the ground that at the time of construction there was no contribution by the purchasers or to put it differently there had been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ho purchase afterwards they really share the value of the construction cost apart from the profit margin due to the builder or the seller. Unless such an interpretation is placed, the original owner of flats when he ceases to be the owner of the building or the purchaser of a small apartment less then 278.7 square meters would still be liable to pay luxury tax. Such an interpretation would lead to absurdity. 15. In our considered opinion, the principle of purposive interpretation of the provisio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x for all floors/apartments subject to the cap provided under Section 5A of the Act. In this context we may refer to the decision in State of T.N. v. Kodaikanal Motor Union (P) Ltd.(1989) 3 SCC 91 wherein this Court, after referring to K.P. Varghese b. ITO (1981) 4 SCC 172 : 1981 SCC (Tax) 293 and Luke v. IRC (1964) 54 ITR 692 : 1963 AC 557 (HL) , observed thus:- "The courts must always seek to find out the intention of the legislature. Though the courts must find out the intention of the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to endeavour to avoid an unjust or absurd result. We should not make a mockery of legislation. To make sense out of an unhappily worded provision, where the purpose is apparent to the judicial eye some' violence to language is permissible." 16. In Keshavji Ravji and Co. v. CIT (1990) 2 SCC 231 it has been held by this court that when in a taxation statute where literal interpretation leads to a result that does not sub-serve the object of the legislation another construction in consona .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version