New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (7) TMI 397 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (7) TMI 397 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Disallowance of interest expenses holding advances granted by the assessee to be not out of commercial expediency - CIT(A) deleted the interest - Held that:- CIT(A), while granting relief to the assessee, has noted that the assessee has given interest free advances to those parties with whom the assessee was having regular business transactions and some of them were suppliers of raw-material and packing material and the advance was made for purchase of m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A) has also noted that no disallowance on account of interest was made by the Assessing Officer in earlier years and after examining the various loans and advances in the light of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of S.A. Builder Ltd. (2006 (12) TMI 82 - SUPREME COURT ) has given a categorical finding that the loans and advances given by the assessee were for business purposes. Before us, the Revenue has not brought any material on record to controvert the findings o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0.07.2011 and 07.07.2011 passed in Assessment Years 2001-02 and 2002-03 respectively. 2. Before us, both the parties submitted that in both these appeals the common ground of appeal taken by the Revenue is that the CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 40,26,706/- in the Assessment Year 2001-02 and ₹ 33,65,950/- in the Assessment Year 2002- 03, made by the Assessing Officer on account of disallowance of interest. It was further submitted that since the fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4. The assessee is a Company stated to be engaged in the business of manufacturing of Ice-cream by the trade name 'Vadilal'. The assesseecompany filed its original Return of Income for Assessment Year 2001-02 declaring loss of ₹ 1,12,77,669/-. The assessment was framed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 26.02.2004 and total income was determined at ₹ 59,56,858/- by inter alia disallowing interest of ₹ 1,54,72,055/-. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r back to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh keeping in mind the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.A. Builder Ltd. Vs. CIT(A), [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC). Pursuant to the aforesaid directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, the Assessing Officer vide order dated 16.11.2009, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 of the Income-tax Act, noted that the assessee had advanced interest free loans to sister concerns in spite of pending term loans and working .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngly held that no deduction was allowable to the assessee. He, thus, disallowed the claim of interest and assessed the total loss at ₹ 72,47,965/-. 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) who vide order dated 20.07.2011 allowed the appeal of the assessee by holding as under:- "3.5 Decision: I have carefully perused the assessment order, the submissions given by the appellant, the order of the ITAT through whic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich have been used in the production of finished goods. Some deposits are kept with various government / semi government authorities for getting electric connection, telephone connection, registration with sales tax authorities etc. Similarly, there is some balance with the excise authorities which was the advance payment of excise duty to be adjusted on clearance of goods. It is noticed that most of the advances were given in earlier years and there are few transactions during the current year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

observed by the Hon'ble Court that the revenue cannot justifiably claim to put itself in the arm-chair of businessman or in the position of the Board of Directors and assume the role to decide how much is the reasonable expenditure having regard to the circumstances of the case. No businessman can be compelled to maximize its profit. In the case of the appellant, the appellant is a loss making company and had approached BIFR for declaring it as a sick company. The company had no liquid fund .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble Supreme Court given in the case of S. A. Builders, I am of the view that the loans and advances given by the appellant are for business purposes and no disallowance can be made by the A. O. by saying that interest bearing funds have been advanced as interest free loans. The addition made by the A. O. is accordingly deleted." 6. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is now in appeal before the us. 7. Before us, the ld. Departmental Representative pointed out to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version