Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Radhe Residency Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Surat

2015 (7) TMI 716 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Penalty u/s 78 - whether penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is required to be imposed upon the appellant who has paid the entire differential service tax liability before the same was detected by Revenue - Held that:- Differential service tax amount was paid by the appellant before the date of visit of the audit officers. Only the interest amount was not paid by the appellant, which also was paid by the appellant before issue of snow cause notice - premises of the appellant in tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vice tax can be attributed on the part of the appellant and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is not imposable - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/13311/2014 - Final Order No. A/10817/2015-WZB/AHD - Dated:- 18-6-2015 - H K Thakur, Member (T),J. For the Appellant : Shri Manoj N Makhania, CA For the Respondent : Shri Govind Jha, AR ORDER Per: H K Thakur: This appeal has been filed by the appellant with respect to OIA No. OIA-SUR-EXCUS-001-APP-37/14-15 dated 21.05.2014, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f ₹ 1,10,11,000/- was found disclosed to the Income Tax department under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. That before the date of audit, the appellant had already paid the differential service tax of ₹ 3,40,240/- and interest of ₹ 27,219/- was immediately paid by the appellant as pointed out by the audit. It was the case of the learned Chartered Accountant that when differential service tax amount was paid before detected by the department, therefore, their case was co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax department and after certain income was disclosed to the Income Tax department, which was required to form the assessable value under Finance Act, 1994. He relied upon order No. A/754/WZB/AHD/2010 dated 23.06.2010 passed by this Bench where under similar circumstances the penalty imposed upon the appellant was upheld. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in the present proceedings is whether penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is required to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version