Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (4) , Salem Versus M/s. S. 681 Chinnathirupathi PACB Ltd, Salem

2015 (7) TMI 738 - ITAT CHENNAI

Deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) - Whether CIT (Appeals) ought to have considered the fact that deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) is allowable only on net receipts after deducting the expenses from the gross receipts of interest and that the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) on prorata basis - Held that:- The argument of the ld. Departmental Representative is misconceived. The Departmental Representative cannot raise the issue what was not considered by the Assessing Officer. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was based on the orders of Co-ordinate Bench which is binding on this Tribunal. - Decided against revenue. - I.T.A.No.946/Mds/2015 - Dated:- 17-7-2015 - Shri N.R.S. Ganesan and Shri Chandra Poojari, JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri. S. Das Gupta, IRS, JCIT. For the Respondent : None ORDER PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Salem, dated 29.01.2015 for the assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in civil supply goods and according a report under section 44AB has been filed. The assessee in computation statement filed during the assessment proceedings has claimed an amount of ₹ 52,50,233/- has deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. In the profit and loss account the assessee has credited ₹ 58,90,987/- under the head miscellaneous income. The assessee has claimed the following amount as deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. Sl.No Dividend on Shares Rs. 1 SDCCB Ltd Salem 8,250 2 IFF .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee seems to be excessive. The assessee has not furnished net income eligible for deduction inspite of opportunity given. So, the Assessing Officer derived the net income worked out as under:- Total Available Funds Rs.23,95,53,103/- Total interest bearing funds Deposits from 1. Members Rs.17,54,01,016/- 2. Non Members Rs.58,00,780/- Borrowings from 1. SDCCB 2. T.N. State Govt Rs.34,920/- Total 18,12,36,716/- Proportionate of Interest bearing funds to the total funds is 76% 3.1 Thus, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ive societies is ₹ 52,50,233/- ₹ 39,09,644/- = ₹ 13,50,589/-. The Assessing Officer computed the qualifying amount eligible for 80P(2)(d) deduction is ₹ 13,40,589/-. Aggrieved the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 4. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) followed the earlier order of the Tribunal Chennai Bench in the case of M/s. SL(SPL) 151 Karkudalpatty PACCS Ltd vs. ITO in ITA No.292/Mds/2014 dated 17.03.2014 wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT(A) observes that as assessee s nominal / B class members are not treated as members in its audit record etc, it is not entitled for deduction. Thus, he has cancelled deduction of ₹ 3,75,420/- granted by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, the assessee is in appeal. We have heard both parties and gone through the case file. As stated in the preceding paragraphs, the CIT(A) has proceeded to enhance the assessment(supra) only on the ground that the assessee s credit and various other loan fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te member u/s 2(6) appended therein. In other words, the nominal members also enjoy statutory recognition as per the Act. The net result is that once the nominal members or non-voting members are themselves included in the definition of members , they satisfy the relevant condition imposed by the legislature u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). We make it clear that we are dealing with a deduction provision to be interpreted liberally. In our considered opinion, the objections of the Revenue that the members defin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A or B category is concerned. We follow the same and accept contentions of the assessee . The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) also placed reliance on the order of the Tribunal Chennai Bench in the case of M/s. The Salem Agricultural Producers Co-Operative Marketing Society Ltd vs. ITO, Salem in ITA Nos.730, 731 & 732/Mds/2014, dated 30.06.2014, wherein the Tribunal held that We have heard both sides, perused the materials on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT(Appeals confirmed the order passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals). We find that in the case of CIT v. Kangra Co-operative Bank Ltd. [2009] 309 ITR 106 (HP), the Hon ble Himachal Pradesh High Court has considered section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The interest earned by the assessee co-operative bank on fixed deposits with Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank in compliance with the provisions of section 57 of the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1968, the income derived from banking busine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version