Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Rajendra Kumar Chopra, Kanpur Versus A.C.I.T. -V, Kanpur

Addition on account of alleged payment of insurance premium - Held that:- It is the assertion of the assessee that the concerned truck No. UP 78 B 1033 belonged to Shri Rakesh Kumar Chopra, nephew of the assessee and it is also asserted by the assessee before learned CIT(A) that such a fact had been got clarified by the A.O. through enquiries made from the office of R.T.O. This assertion of the assessee could not be controverted by any of the authorities below or by Learned D.R. of the Revenue. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it with M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur - Held that:- It is undisputed fact that the amount is standing in the name of Suman Bala Chopra, wife of the assessee, in the books of M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur. The basis of making addition by the Assessing Officer is that Suman Bala Chopra, wife of the assessee, is not assessed to tax and the Assessing Officer has straight away invoked the provisions of section 64 of the Act for making this addition without pin pointing as to which clause of sub section ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jay Textiles, Kanpur was made by the assessee’s wife in the pre block period then income accruing out of such investment cannot be added in the hands of the present assessee. This is also noted by the Assessing Officer in the same Para of the assessment order that no fresh deposit was made by Suman Bala Chopra during block period. As per the ledger account copy available on pages 21 to 27 also, during this period, the addition is only on account of interest for each year and there is no fresh in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dence should have been brought on record by the Assessing Officer to show that the assessee was having more trucks and therefore, the assessee cannot get the benefit of section 44AE. Even if that is fact that the assessee is not covered u/s 44AE then also it is admitted position that the deposit in the bank accounts is relatable to freight charges and therefore, the total amount cannot be added as income of the assessee because for earning freight charges, expenses are to be incurred and to be a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

48,000/- in assessment year 2000-2001 and ₹ 90,000/- in assessment year 2001-02 totaling to ₹ 2.46 lac in assessment year 1997-98 to assessment year 2001-02. It is also seen that as per the details of deposit in bank account also, as appearing in Para 26 of the assessment order, there was no deposit in bank account after financial year 2000-2001. Hence, in the facts of the present case, the addition is not justified. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No.750/LKW/2013 - Dated:- 17 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

payment of insurance premium 3,107 (b) interest on deposit with M/s. Sanjay textiles, Kanpur as made by Smt. Suman Bala Chopra (wife of the appellant) 74,093 (c) dposit in SB A/c. No. 1863 with Allahabad Bank, Sakkarpati Branch, Kanpur, in the name of the appellant 1,58,810 (d) Deposit in SB A/c. No. 709 with United Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd, Godarinpurwa Branch, Fazalganj, Kanpur, standing in the names of "Rajendra Kumar Chopra Harish Kumar Chopra 2,16,843 2. BECAUSE none of the add .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the contrary found during the course of search under section 132(1), no such addition could have been made / sustained in the block period assessment. 4. BECAUSE source of deposits in the two bank accounts aggregating ₹ 3,75,653/- (Rs.1,58,810 + 2,16,843) stood fully explained and covered from the incomes disclosed by the "appellant" in the 'returns' filed in regular course and the 'Authorities' below have grievously erred in not giving benefit of 'assessed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

", as "undisclosed income". 6. BECAUSE in any case addition of ₹ 3,75,653/- as sustained by the "CIT(A)" is" to much high and excessive. 7. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principles of natural justice. 3. Regarding ground No. 1(a) in respect of addition of ₹ 3,107/- on account of alleged payment of insurance premium, it was submitted by Learned A.R. of the assessee that on page No. 19 of the paper book is the receipt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

same contentions, which were raised before learned CIT(A) and were reproduced by him in Para 4.1 of his order. 4. Learned D. R. of the Revenue supported the orders of the authorities below. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. First of all we reproduce Para 4.1 from the order of learned CIT(A) in which he has reproduced the written submissions submitted by the assessee before him, which is as under: 4.1 In this regard, the Ld. A.R. of the appellant has submitted as under: "That as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ceeding it had been explained that insurance co. had wrongly mentioned the name of the appellant in the cover note and in support of this contention, a corrected cover note was a/so placed on record. Thus, this addition of ₹ 3,107/- was not justified." 5.1 From the above Para from the order of learned CIT(A), it is seen that it is the assertion of the assessee that the concerned truck No. UP 78 B 1033 belonged to Shri Rakesh Kumar Chopra, nephew of the assessee and it is also asserted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nusual to find a receipt of the nephew of the assessee at the place of the assessee and under these facts, we feel that the addition is not justified and the same is deleted. 6. Regarding ground No. 1(b) in respect of addition made by the Assessing Officer of ₹ 74,093/- on account of interest on deposit with M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur, it was submitted by Learned A.R. of the assessee that the copy of ledger account of Suman Bala Chopra, wife of the assessee, in the books of M/s Sanjay Tex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue supported the orders of the authorities below. 8. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that it is undisputed fact that the amount is standing in the name of Suman Bala Chopra, wife of the assessee, in the books of M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur. The basis of making addition by the Assessing Officer is that Suman Bala Chopra, wife of the assessee, is not assessed to tax and the Assessing Officer has straight away invoked the provisions of section 64 of the Act for making this additio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etc. As per clause (iv) of sub section (1) of section 64, if any income is accruing to the spouse of the assessee from some assets transferred by the assessee otherwise than for adequate consideration in that case, such income accruing to the spouse will be added in the hands of the assessee who has transferred such assets to the spouse. Hence, before proceeding to invoke the provisions of section 64(1)(iv), this is pre-requirement that this fact is established that some asset has been transfer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se without adequate consideration. It was also submitted by the assessee before the CIT(A) as per his submission reproduced by CIT(A) in Para 5.1 of his order that the Assessing Officer has proceeded on this basis that the wife of the assessee was not assessed to tax but this is ignored that necessary details of assessment of Suman Bala Chopra was produced in respect of post search years and for earlier period, she was not enjoying taxable income and therefore, no return was filed by her. As per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Assessing Officer that the deposit of ₹ 58,764/- was made by the assessee s wife with M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur prior to block period and therefore, it does not require any further verification. As per the copy of ledger account of Suman Bala Chopra with M/s Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur, appearing on page No. 21 of the paper book for the financial year 1996-97, it is seen that the opening balance shown is ₹ 58,764/- and this is admitted by the Assessing Officer in Para 11 that the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dger account copy available on pages 21 to 27 also, during this period, the addition is only on account of interest for each year and there is no fresh investment by the wife of the assessee. Considering all these facts, in our considered opinion, the addition is not justified and section 64 is not applicable. Hence, this addition is deleted. 9. Ground No. 1(c) and 1(d) are regarding deposit in SB account No. 1863 with Allahabad Bank ₹ 1,58,810/- and SB account No. 709 with United Mercanti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Mehrotra [2010] 320 ITR 403 (All) 10. He also reiterated the same contentions which were made before learned CIT(A) and which have been reproduced by him in Para 6.1.2 of his order. 11. Learned D. R. of the Revenue supported the orders of the authorities below. 12. We have considered the rival submissions. First of all we reproduce the relevant Para from the order of learned CIT(A) i.e. Para 6.1.2 where learned CIT(A) has reproduced the written submissions made by Learned A.R. of the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the drivers. The appellant has shown the income from truck plying business as per provisions of section 44 AE of the I.T. Act, 1961 and the net income including the income on the deposits in these account was already shown u/s 44 AE of the I. T. Act, 1961. 2. That while completing the assessment the Ld. A.O. has dis-believed the appellant's submission and out rightly made an addition of ₹ 3,75,653/- after considering the receipts of Dinesh Oil Ltd. only and has, altogether ignored the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nk account. The appellant has already shown the 'income earned on account of the truck plying business u/s 44 AE of the I, T. Act, 1961 only these accounts were left to be mentioned. 12.1 From the above Para of the written submissions of the assessee reproduced by learned CIT(A), we find that it is the claim of the assessee that the entire deposit in these accounts represents the receipts on account of truck plying business in shape of freight from various parties and the same were being wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me, in assessment year 1997-98, the assessee has disclosed net income from truck plying being truck No. UAN 9214 at ₹ 24,000/-. Similarly in assessment year 1998-99 ₹ 24,000/- was disclosed as income in respect of the same truck and ₹ 2,000/- was disclosed for another truck No. UP 78B 3175 purchased on 25/03/98 and in this manner, total income as per section 44AE was worked out at ₹ 26,000/- but the assessee disclosed the income of ₹ 36,000/- in that year. Similarly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ges 5 to 7 of the assessment order and there, it is noted that in course of block assessment proceedings, information u/s 133(6) was called for from M/s Dinesh Oils Ltd., Kanpur regarding the business transaction with the assessee during the block period and it was indicated by that company that they have paid certain freight charges to the assessee on different dates i.e. financial year 1998-99 and 1999-2000. Thereafter, the Assessing Officer examined the assessee and the statement was obtained .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer has worked out year-wise position of deposit in these accounts and the same is tabulated on page No. 8 of the assessment order and the total deposit in these accounts during financial year 1996-97 to 2002-03 was noted at ₹ 3,75,653/- and the Assessing Officer made the addition of entire such deposit. When these two facts are examined together, it comes out that the deposit in bank accounts were in respect of receipt of freight charges from various customers and the assessee has disc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g more trucks and for that reason, the assessee is not covered u/s 44AE of the Act then some evidence should have been brought on record by the Assessing Officer to show that the assessee was having more trucks and therefore, the assessee cannot get the benefit of section 44AE. Even if that is fact that the assessee is not covered u/s 44AE then also it is admitted position that the deposit in the bank accounts is relatable to freight charges and therefore, the total amount cannot be added as inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version